But it finds, if I interpret correctly what is wanting in explicitness, that, instead of aiming at the protection of householders from
intrusion upon needed hours of rest or from those plying evil trades, whether pretending the sale of pots and pans or the distribution of leaflets, the ordinance before us merely penalizes the distribution of «literature.»
The Court of Appeal reversed the decision in part and awarded $ 10,000, recognizing a right of action for
intrusion upon seclusion to reflect the changing
needs of society.