2013) 718 F. 3d 1052 (the mere risk that plaintiff will face prohibitive costs is too speculative to justify
invalidating arbitration agreement), on the ground that the fee provision was not speculative and there were other unconscionable terms.
The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act) makes arbitration agreements «valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract,» 9 U.S.C. ¶ 2, establishes an equal - treatment principle: A court may
invalidate an arbitration agreement based on «generally applicable contract defenses,» but not on legal rules that «apply only to arbitration or that derive their meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue,» AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339.
Thus, if there is duress, undue influence or mistake which
invalidates the arbitration agreement there will be no waiver of relevant rights under Art 6.
Not exact matches
With respect to class action waivers in
arbitration clauses, recall that in 2010 the South Carolina Supreme Court
invalidated a provision in an
arbitration agreement requiring purchasers to waive their right to participate in a «class action or multi-plaintiff or claimant action in court or through
arbitration.»
Because the Kentucky Supreme Court
invalidated the Clark - Kindred
arbitration agreement in this nursing home matter, based exclusively on the clear - statement rule, the court must now enforce that
agreement.
The dissent then sided with the Second, Fifth, and Eighth Circuits» conclusions that «the NLRA does not
invalidate collective action waivers in
arbitration agreements,» asserting that such decisions were consistent with Supreme Court precedent.
In addition, the court also denied plaintiffs» motion to
invalidate mandatory
arbitration and class action waiver clauses contained in independent contractor
agreements executed by class members.