Sentences with phrase «investigate research misconduct»

COPE head Elizabeth Wager echoed this view in her introductory talk, recounting instances of universities «not cooperating with journals and failing to investigate research misconduct properly.»

Now, both sides are awaiting the expert panel's final verdict, which may influence an ongoing debate about how Swedish institutions investigate research misconduct.

The expertise needed to investigate research misconduct cases is very different than investigating sexual harassment cases, says Price, who spent 17 years at the Office of Research Integrity, which handles misconduct by federally funded biomedical researchers.

Han's fate can be traced to the attention he received from U.S. Senator Charles Grassley (R - IA), who has a long history of investigating research misconduct.

In an effort to get all the players onboard, the bodies representing the research councils and universities, and other organizations are nearing the completion of a much - delayed «concordat» on investigating research misconduct, due to be released in March or April of this year.

Not exact matches

Ackenhusen further testified that she explained the process of investigating misconduct cases, but «since it didn't appear that Dr. Perez - Melgosa was making a complaint of research misconduct against herself... and it did not appear there was an allegation of research misconduct at that time» — Nickerson had not lodged a formal complaint — «I did not pursue it further.»

She denies changing data and wanted a panel of competent and impartial scientific experts to examine the evidence, but the relevant UW unit, then known as the Office of Scholarly Integrity (OSI) and now called the Office of Research Misconduct Proceedings, did not investigate the case.

The story got weird last week when we learned that Shunsuke Ishii, the chair of the RIKEN investigating committee that found Obokata guilty of research misconduct, is also under investigation for research misconduct.

► In April, we reported that stem cell scientist Haruko Obokata (the lead author of the two STAP — stimulus - triggered acquisition of pluripotency — papers in Nature) was found guilty of research misconduct by a RIKEN investigating committee.

Lee hopes others will continue to investigate whether the new approach — which has been dogged by claims of research misconduct — can really lead to stem cells.

On 7 December, Uppsala University in Sweden released a long - awaited report by its Board for Investigation of Misconduct in Research, which investigated a high - profile paper about the effects of microplastics on fish, published in Science in June 2016.

Taken for Granted: Ain't Misbehavin» Next, our columnist investigates the impact of the structure of the systems in which we work on the frequency of research misconduct and concludes, with experts on the subject, that science works best without hierarchy.

The investigating committee concluded that there had been «inappropriate handling of data» for two of the items under investigation, but these were «not judged to constitute research misconduct,» according to a RIKEN press release.

An investigating committee found numerous problems with the papers and concluded in a 31 March report that two of those, both in the article, constituted research misconduct.

Shunsuke Ishii, the chair of the RIKEN investigating committee that recently found stem cell scientist Haruko Obokata (first author on the Nature papers reporting the STAP results) guilty of research misconduct, is himself under investigation for research misconduct.

Rather than rely just on retraction notices from journals — which in some cases they couldn't access without paying a fee, Casadevall says — they cross-referenced as many retractions as they could with other sources, including reports from the U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI), which investigates scientific misconduct.

«There are already other reasons why institutions may be reluctant to investigate allegations involving research misconduct (e.g., time, expense, loss of revenue, bad publicity),» wrote Ferric Fang, a microbiologist at the University of Washington, Seattle, in an email to ScienceInsider.

The panel «found substantial evidence that Kajstura may have committed research misconduct acting alone,» according to the court document, and recommended a full investigation of Anversa and Leri «on the theory that they negligently failed to investigate Kajstura's misconduct.»

Instead, it cited the process already in place to handle such disputes: ORI investigates reports of research misconduct at federally funded institutions, and if it finds a researcher has committed misconduct, it sends a «charge letter» outlining its finding and suggesting sanctions.

An investigating committee found the lead author, Haruko Obokata, guilty of research misconduct.

The National Science Foundation, for instance, investigates misconduct itself, whereas the Office of Research Integrity in the Department of Health and Human Services can only provide oversight of universities» investigations.

Something all can agree on, however, is that misconduct in the United Kingdom, particularly in the area of medical research, is an endemic problem: An informal survey released by BMJ at the meeting showed that out of 2700 responses by BMJ subscribers, 13 % of medical and academic researchers had witnessed misconduct and 6 % were aware of possible research misconduct at their institution that hadn't been properly investigated.

Koziol claims that «Yale broke its contract with her by failing to report her case to the Office of Research Integrity (ORI), the U.S. agency that investigates misconduct in federally funded biomedical researchResearch Integrity (ORI), the U.S. agency that investigates misconduct in federally funded biomedical researchresearch.»

That quasi-independent office now investigates waste, fraud, and abuse of NSF funds, as well as investigating allegations of research misconduct.

OSR commits to vigorously investigating, and if warranted, taking action on any credible allegation of research misconduct (RM), pursuant to this document11.

The Ospedale San Raffaele Research Integrity Office commits to vigorously investigating, and if warranted pursuing any credible allegation of research misconduct, while also protecting its community from unsubstantiated allegations of research misResearch Integrity Office commits to vigorously investigating, and if warranted pursuing any credible allegation of research misconduct, while also protecting its community from unsubstantiated allegations of research misresearch misconduct, while also protecting its community from unsubstantiated allegations of research misresearch misconduct.

Update on Macchiarini's investigation Karolinska University Hospital, which investigated ethical research misconduct by tissue engineering pioneer Paolo Macchiarini, has released report this week.

Research Institutions, or in limited circumstances discussed in Section b, the DOT Oversight Organization, shall use the following procedures to investigate allegations of research misResearch Institutions, or in limited circumstances discussed in Section b, the DOT Oversight Organization, shall use the following procedures to investigate allegations of research misresearch misconduct:

... «journals and research institutions don't have adequate systems in place to properly investigate misconduct.»

The Hospital informed the applicant researchers that an investigation committee of three scientists would be investigating the allegations of research misconduct.

• Intricately investigated internal divisional misconduct to include internal investigations, hearing coordination and auditing, researched personal property initiatives, and civil / criminal case preparation.