When I first started
investigating global warming science, I attempted to discern the cause by a process of elimination.
Not exact matches
It's the perfect place to
investigate the thorniest problem in all of climate
science: how haze and clouds interact to boost or moderate
global warming.
It's the perfect place to
investigate the thorniest problem in all of climate
science: how haze and clouds interact to influence
global warming, either boosting or moderating it.
While the basics of
global warming science are now firmly established, climatologists immersed in «attribution» research,
investigating the mix of factors shaping a particular heat wave, deluge or drought, are still arguing long and hard about whether there is a discernible contribution from human - driven
warming.
Prominent scientists operating outside the scientific consensus on climate change urged Congress on Wednesday to fund «red teams» to
investigate «natural» causes of
global warming and challenge the findings of the United Nations» climate
science panel.
A valuable post from Joanne Nova
investigating the «monopolistic» funding of research into the
science of man - made
global warming, versus the non-existent resources directed toward the study of natural climate change.
2) The majority of those having meteological background in the U.S. are
global warming skeptics... they don't understand that
global warming is happening yet they haven't taken the time to
investigate and see that it is, and their background in other earth
sciences, including hydrology, is limited.