Sentences with phrase «investment arbitration rules»
Lim Seok Hui: The investment arbitration rules — watch this space.
http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/ Not exact matches
The decision ends more than eight years of arbitration which began in July 2004, when the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID») received a request from Vannessa Ventures for arbitration against Venezuela under ICSID's Additional Facility Rules.
SCC Arbitration Rules are among the most widely used in commercial and investment arbitration globally.
The new rules are weak and allow multiple consumer banking arbitration services, thereby destroying the Ombudsman for Banking and Investments (OBSI) which had resolved consumer complaints well.
With an eye to cutting the cost and time of complex arbitration matters, the International Chamber of Commerce has released a revised version of its rules of to better serve businesses and governments engaged in international commerce and investment.
Following on from the Sanum [3] and Philip Morris [4] cases and together with the launch of the SIAC Investment Arbitration Rules and the recent establishment of regional offices for both the PCA and ICC in Singapore, it suggests that investment arbitration is onInvestment Arbitration Rules and the recent establishment of regional offices for both the PCA and ICC in Singapore, it suggests that investment arbitration is oninvestment arbitration is on the rise.
Chairman or member of Arbitral Tribunals in more than 150 commercial or investment arbitrations carried out under the rules of the ICC, ICSID, UNCITRAL, SCC, LCIA, AAA, Vienna Arbitral Chamber, Milan Arbitral Chamber and the Cairo Regional Centre for International Commercial Arbitration.
a leading international financial institution as respondent in a US$ 20 million arbitration under China International Economics and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) rules, relating to a failed investment
On March 15, the SCC and K&L Gates will host a one - day conference in Warsaw to discuss investment treaty arbitration under the 2017 SCC Rules.
Investor - state arbitration clauses in investment treaties between EU Member States are incompatible with EU law, the European Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark judgment.
During the UNCITRAL colloquium on PPPs in 2014, for example, participants questioned the suitability of utilizing international arbitration for PPP - related disputes, mainly because of the «multiple investment treaties, multiple international arbitration forums, cases and rulings, and the poor enforcement of international arbitral awards».
Representing in arbitration proceedings under the UNCITRAL Rules commenced by 14 investment funds based on alleged violations of the protections in the Energy Charter Treaty.
The disputes are often considered under a foreign applicable law and resolved under the arbitration rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for Dispute Resolution of the American Arbitration Association (ICDR), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), The World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), or the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL).
Moot arbitrators and other invited speakers shared their experience and insight into the most recent developments in investment arbitration and, in particular, in the arbitrations conducted under the SCC Rules.
The day before the competition, SCC also hosted a seminar in Stockholm on investment arbitration under the SCC rules.
Our lawyers are presently handling disputes under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), American Arbitration Association (AAA), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), Vienna International Arbitral Center (VIAC) and UNCITRAL rules; we also have extensive experience with other forms of institutional arbitration and ad hoc arbitrations, including arbitration of public international law issues.
Recently several arbitration institutes released new Arbitration Rules, some expanding the scope of their administration to include investment disputes.
Our lawyers are presently handling disputes under the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), American Arbitration Association (AAA), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), Vienna International Arbitral Center (VIAC) and UNCITRAL rules; we also have extensive experience with other forms of institutional arbitration and ad hoc arbitrations.
His international arbitration practice spans states and state entities predominantly operating under the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes and the ICC International Court of Arbitration rules.
Represents the Republic of Ecuador in an UNCITRAL Rules arbitration under the Ecuador - United States bilateral investment treaty with respect to claims by a foreign oil producer challenging an Ecuadorian law establishing State participation in windfall oil profits resulting from an unforeseen rise in prices.
In fact, lawyers with either a commercial arbitration or a public international law background — the two approaches that most actively shape international investment law and arbitration at present — stress such a limited function of arbitration, while having divergent views on what the rule of law may mean in this context.
Represented the Slovak Republic in an UNCITRAL Rules arbitration under the Netherlands - Czech and Slovak investment encouragement and protection treaty arising from proposals to unitize the Slovakian health insurance sector.
Represented the Republic of Nicaragua in an arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, to obtain compensation for the cancellation of an investment contract for banana plantations by an American company.
This makes investment treaty arbitration into an adjudicatory process for resolving investor - State disputes that involves predetermined rules of procedure and substance, much like when a State submits to the jurisdiction of an international human rights court or to administrative or constitutional judicial review at the domestic level.
It further addresses the provisions in the new annex in 2017 SCC Rules on investment treaty arbitration.
The Mauritius Convention will extend the application of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency, which so far have a very limited scope of application (only to UNCITRAL investor - State arbitrations that are based on treaties concluded on or after 1 April 2014), potentially to the entire treaty - based international investment regime as it stood on 1 April 2014.
Represents the Republic of India in an UNCITRAL Rules arbitration under the India - France investment promotion and protection treaty related to the port cargo - handling industry.
He advises on and acts as counsel in arbitrations under the rules of the major arbitral institutions with a particular focus on energy, telecoms, joint venture, shareholder and other investment disputes in Southeast Asia.
He sits in both ad hoc and institutionally administered arbitrations involving maritime, construction, commercial, oil & gas, infrastructure and investment disputes conducted under all major arbitration rules.
This means that intra-EU investment arbitration can survive only to the extent that (i) arbitrators are willing to disregard the implications of EU law incompatibility on their jurisdiction, (ii) arbitration is seated and awards enforced outside the EU, and (iii) national courts in non-EU jurisdictions are willing to defy the CJEU's ruling.
Harbour has funded international arbitration cases governed by a wide range of different rules, from ICSID (otherwise known as Bi-lateral Investment Treaty — or BIT — cases) through to ICC and LCIA cases.
He has acted as counsel in numerous commercial and construction arbitrations in the UAE and internationally, both ad hoc and under the rules of the major arbitral institutions, including the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC), DIFC - LCIA, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), and UNCITRAL.
We have extensive experience acting as counsel in international commercial and investment treaty arbitrations under all major arbitral rules, seated in Australia and around the world.
We will examine the actual mechanisms for investor - State dispute settlement under arbitral facilities such as the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes as well as under ad hoc arbitration rules.
Julian Wilson's appearances in commercial arbitrations include, in Vienna, under the rules of the Vienna International Arbitral Centre, handling an exclusive distributorship dispute in the scientific equipment sector; under LCIA rules, of a negligence claim against an international investment bank acting as valuer of an Eastern European bank in administration; under ACI Rules, of a telecoms agreement; and in ad hoc arbitration of «earn - out» provisions in a Share Purchase Agreement relating to the acquisition of anrules of the Vienna International Arbitral Centre, handling an exclusive distributorship dispute in the scientific equipment sector; under LCIA rules, of a negligence claim against an international investment bank acting as valuer of an Eastern European bank in administration; under ACI Rules, of a telecoms agreement; and in ad hoc arbitration of «earn - out» provisions in a Share Purchase Agreement relating to the acquisition of anrules, of a negligence claim against an international investment bank acting as valuer of an Eastern European bank in administration; under ACI Rules, of a telecoms agreement; and in ad hoc arbitration of «earn - out» provisions in a Share Purchase Agreement relating to the acquisition of anRules, of a telecoms agreement; and in ad hoc arbitration of «earn - out» provisions in a Share Purchase Agreement relating to the acquisition of an ISP.
He has more than 35 years of experience representing or counseling parties in relation to international commercial arbitrations under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the Japan Commercial Arbitration Association and the Cairo Regional Centre, as well as ad hoc arbitrations under the UNCITRAL and other arbitration rules.
Perkins Coie represents clients in ad hoc international arbitrations as well as those conducted under the rules of every major arbitral institution, including investor - state arbitrations under the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes.
We have experience working with a range of arbitration rules, with particular expertise in LCIA and International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
Our Investor - State arbitration lawyers have successfully represented States in the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), the ICSID Additional Facility, UNCITRAL rules proceedings, the International Chamber of Commerce, the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, the London Court of International Arbitration, the American Arbitration Association, and others.
Sixth, in a finding that is set to disturb the international investment arbitration community, the Court rules that the EUSFTA's ISDS mechanism falls within a competence shared between the EU and the member states and thereby objects to AG Sharpston's reasoning.
We represent clients at international arbitrations under NAFTA Chapter 11 investment, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the United Nations Commission on International Trade investment, the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Investment Disputes and the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law rules.
He specializes in international commercial and investment arbitration, and has represented clients under most major arbitral rules systems.
In international investment treaty and commercial arbitrations in virtually every country in Central and South America under all major arbitral rules and institutions, including among others International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («ICDinvestment treaty and commercial arbitrations in virtually every country in Central and South America under all major arbitral rules and institutions, including among others International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («ICDInvestment Disputes («ICSID»), International Chamber of Commerce («ICC»), United Nations Commission on International Trade Law («UNCITRAL»), and International Centre for Dispute Resolution («ICDR»);
In 2008 the US entrepreneur Mr Carl A. Sax, represented by Amsterdam & Partners, brought a claim against the city of St Petersburg, Rossiya Airlines and Pulkovo Airport (co-respondents) in an ad hoc arbitration under UNCITRAL Rules in Stockholm, alleging breaches of the investment contract regarding the development of a new international passenger terminal at Pulkovo International Airport in St Petersburg back in the 1990s.
The team advises on commercial and investment treaty arbitrations, and has experience with all of the major international arbitration rules and seats.