Sentences with phrase «investor asset valuation»

Is downside risk the critical driver of investor asset valuation?

Not exact matches

Stocks remain the best place to invest in 2017 and beyond, as compelling valuations show the market has further room to run, according to Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management's Andy Chase, who oversees more than $ 20 billion in assets for investors.

Remember, plenty of other experienced investors are buying in at this valuation expecting asset - light Uber to be worth at least $ 100 billion at IPO — and many pundits called Fidelity nuts to invest at a $ 17 billion pre-money just six months ago (similar accusations were hurled at TPG and Google Ventures for giving it a $ 2 billion + mark in the summer of 2013).

More broadly, the regulatory agencies in the United States and the Financial Stability Board internationally have work under way focusing on possible fire - sale risk associated with the growing share of less liquid bonds held in asset management portfolios on behalf of investors who may be counting on same - day redemption when valuations fall.

Sack and Elsasser attribute the low relative valuation of TIIS over this period to several factors: investor difficulty adjusting to a new asset class, divergent supply trends between TIIS and nominal Treasuries, and the lower liquidity of indexed debt.

The two largest funds in the segment — the $ 15 billion iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and the $ 9 billion SPDR Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Bond ETF (JNK)-- have faced sizable asset outflows as investors fret over high valuations and rising interest rates.

For example, during 2008 and 2009, many third - party investors that invest in alternative assets and have historically invested in our investment funds experienced significant volatility in valuations of their investment portfolios, including a significant decline in the value of their overall private equity, real assets, venture capital and hedge fund portfolios, which affected our ability to raise capital from them.

As usual, instead of recognizing the impact of their own speculation in producing the advance, the first impulse of investors was to try to justify why elevated asset and housing valuations made sense.

Equities are essentially 50 - year duration investments at current valuations, and even if investors are passive and don't hold any view about future market returns at all, one of the basic principles of financial planning is to align the duration of ones assets with the expected horizon over which the funds are expected to be spent.

The end of this free - flowing financial bounty, however, could have consequences down the road for investors too — including regular people who never got to ride the valuation rocket known as Airbnb to $ 10 billon and beyond, but who still have their personal assets or retirement plans tethered to big institutional investors.

As markets — and consequently asset valuations — rise and fall, global corporates and investors are on the watch for the next good buy.

Using private market valuations that were available at the time for Gannett's high quality TV stations and marking to market the company's investments in CareerBuilder and other internet companies, an investor could have concluded that those assets alone where worth north of $ 11 a share at the time.

Investors have developed a prejudice about riskiness of asset classes that ignores valuation levels.

Investors who buy growth at high starting valuations generally end up disappointed» Marathon Asset Management

We see the potential for EM stocks to again outperform in 2018 on rising profitability, higher valuations and investors returning to the asset class.

Because as investors if you're looking at this current contemporary global macroeconomic backdrop from the 10 - 12 year perspective, I find it with the typical disclosure here that I'm not able to see with a perfect crystal ball or anything but it's hard to believe that traditional assets, that global equities, will be thriving in this environment just from the simple perspective of how overstretched they are from any reasonable measure of valuation.

Cash Allocations: I talked about this chart in the video on the Global Risk Radar, specifically I talked about this alongside the chart which showed valuations as expensive for the major assets (property, stocks, and bonds), and how it reflects the trend where central banks have bullied investors out of cash and into other assets.

As we're now in the ninth year of the current cycle, we think investors should consider the mixed nature of incoming data such as China's economic stimulus, global liquidity conditions, a US «hard data» letdown and escalating asset class valuations.

For more on due diligence, see «RCA Asset Manager Panel Offers Insights on Hedge Fund Due Diligence» (Apr. 2, 2015); «Operational Due Diligence From the Hedge Fund Investor Perspective: Deal Breakers, Liquidity, Valuation, Consultants and On - Site Visits» (Apr. 25, 2014); and «Evolving Operational Due Diligence Trends and Best Practices for Due Diligence on Emerging Hedge Fund Managers» (Apr. 18, 2014).

The question comes up: in a low rate world, with assets at historically high valuations, offering historically low returns, what should investors do?

«Simple Asset Class ETF Value Strategy» (SACEVS) finds that investors may be able to exploit relative valuation of the term risk premium, the credit (default) risk premium and the equity risk premium via exchange - traded funds (ETF).

The past several years have featured little more than a gigantic asset swap, the short description being that massive volumes of government debt have been swapped by central banks for massive volumes of idle bank reserves, while massive volumes of low - yielding, covenant - lite debt have been issued into the hands of yield - seeking investors, in order to retire massive volumes of corporate equities at elevated valuations through buybacks.

When the liquidity premium is high, the asset is said to be illiquid, and investors demand additional compensation for the added risk of investing their assets over a longer period of time since valuations can fluctuate with market effects.

My guess is that, just as the typical investor always needs 25 percent of his portfolio to be stable (out of high - volatile asset classes), he also feels comfortable having 25 percent invested in volatile asset classes even at times of high risk (high valuation).

A tactical asset allocation provides the value investor a dynamic investment allocation strategy that adjusts to favorable and unfavorable valuations.

The third type of investors attempt to control their emotions and increase allocations when asset valuations are bargains and decrease allocations when asset valuations are high.

One of the most dangerous things for an investor to do is to make big changes to his asset allocation based on valuations.

Investors of every age should make valuation the primary determinant of their asset allocation.

Value investors need a risk management plan that prevents a permanent loss of capital through the use of asset allocation, diversification, and valuation investing.

For the long - term investor, experiencing gains from high valuations means experiencing even larger drops in future days than you anticipated when buying into the asset class.

activist investors, Amberley Group, blind stock valuation, Brookwell Ltd, Brulines Group, catalyst, Ennismore, GemPAY, HTEC, Jewel in the Crown, P / S Ratio, Progressive Asset Mgmnt, Robert Goddard, segment / divisional reporting, Stephen McLeod, Universe Group, Vianet Group

I'm also investigating how long - term conservative investors may possibly benefit by changing their asset allocations in response to extreme market valuation levels, and one paper I recently finished on this topic is «Revisiting the Fisher and Statman Study on Market Timing.»

«But in reality this is rarely the case and the valuation the investor receives is reflective of the final net asset value.

(As a value investor my problem with a strategic asset allocation is that it ignores the most important variable: valuation).

the European periphery is a bubble («The Euro crisis is not over... the European economies are not going to change for the better for years to come despite all the cheating and breaking of laws»), Value investors need to venture to Russia («when you look at today's opportunity set, you're left with a set of assets where nothing looks attractive from a valuation point of view») or buy gold mining stocks -LRB-» The down cycle could be much bigger than anybody believes if the market realizes that all the actions taken in recent years do not work.»)

of total client assets in the several years leading up to the 2000 market peak, and John Hussman has experienced similar investor attrition over the last few years as his valuation models have kept him largely on the sidelines during the market's current bull market run.

But as long as investors remain relatively uninterested, I see little point in an earnings - based valuation — let's just tot up assets instead.

I was as usual making the case that investors need to pay more attention to valuations when making asset allocation decisions.

It may refer to appreciation of company stocks or bonds held by an investor, an increase in land valuation, or other upward revaluation of fixed assets.

the Macro Funds, and ignoring $ 9 billion of «dry powder») for 1.0 % of AUM, ex-net cash & investments — even when you factor in $ 33 billion of Logan Circle fixed income AUM (which investors may be under - estimating as a potential natural hedge in the current environment), that's an incredibly cheap valuation for an alternative asset manager.

My valuation includes discounts made due to severance package (s), Merger Cancellation Clause, A presumed 2 year lease obligation, and $ 33.2 Million in Cash as well as hard assets appraised by Value Investors for Change.

$ 33.2 Million in cash Minus $ 5.74 Million in total liabilities equals A Market Cap of $ 27.46 Million Minus $ 3.7 Million lease termination Divided by 33.11 Million shares Equals A Cash Valuation of $ 0.72 per share Plus $ 1.12 per share valuation of hard assets that was released last quarter from the research the activist investors put Valuation of $ 0.72 per share Plus $ 1.12 per share valuation of hard assets that was released last quarter from the research the activist investors put valuation of hard assets that was released last quarter from the research the activist investors put together.

Our bias for tangible over intangible assets will almost certainly lead us to a lower valuation for YHOO than another investor with a preference for intangible assets which generate earnings or cash flow.

In a sort of mirror image of the 1999 Dot - Com bubble, when investors overpaid for high risk, non-yielding stocks, the market today is characterized by eye - popping valuations for «safe» assets from bonds of all types to the most conservative sectors of the stock market.

WD - 40 is a good microcosm of how investors, understandably scared by the way risky assets got crushed in the wake of both the Dot - Com bubble and the Great Recession, are making the same mistake again, but this time through chasing what they think are safe assets up to unsustainably high valuations.

For instance, companies were able to report net pension assets on their balance sheets even when their pension plans were in serious deficit.This led to situations where analysts and investors weren't including off - balance sheet liabilities in share - price valuation.

With asset valuations at record highs, it's easy for investors for decide they're going to move to cash, or change their asset allocations to something more conservative.

An adaptive asset allocation is best because it can adapt to both the investor's profile and non-investor considerations such as valuations.

We are encouraged that investors have rediscovered the stock and are sitting tight believing the company is worth more than current valuation: only 7X earnings per share (EPS), 4.5 X cash flow, and well below our estimate of net asset value.

In this edition, we feature a Business Insider summary of a recent Baupost letter, a summary of Guy Spier's approach to using checklists, a video of Tom Russo's talk at Google on «Global Value Investing», a ValueWalk article on Pzena Asset Management, an FT article on Steve Jobs which analyses the start - up conditions at Apple; plus two more videos at the end of this issue — one from Bill Miller on why he thinks now is the perfect time to buy US stocks, the other from London Value Investor Conference speaker Jean - Marie Eveillard who speaks about market cycles and the risks he sees ahead from «valuation problems» brought about by quantitative easing.