Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac encourage home ownership by purchasing mortgages on the secondary market, securitizing them, and reselling them to investors with the implicit guarantee that the government will reimburse
investors if borrowers default on the mortgages.
Not exact matches
For example,
if a
borrower defaults on their mortgage, Fannie and Freddie are responsible for the losses on the loans they guarantee to
investors, while Ginnie Mae is financially responsible for the bond payments to the holders of Ginnie Mae securities.
Since
investors» money and risk of loss is directly tied to an individual
borrower, it could present the
borrower with an unsafe situation
if they were to
default on a loan with their identity or personal details known.
Making a so - called «qualified mortgage» (QM), which can't have riskier features like interest - only payments or balloon payments, protects a mortgage lender from liability
if it sells the loan to
investors and then the
borrower defaults.
If lenders sell non-QM loans, and the
borrowers default, lenders are less protected from lawsuits and «buybacks,» having to refund the
investors» money.
So for the loans which are underwritten to, say FNMA Guidelines,
investors know there is a certain underlying credit quality for the MBS that they purchase and even
if a
borrower defaults on their mortgage, the
investor will be fully repaid.
+ read full definition in the property to pay
investors back
if the
borrower defaults and the property needs to be resold.
If a
borrower defaults on a mortgage, the
investors still get paid by the GSE.
In other words,
if a
borrower defaults on the mortgage, Fannie or Freddie will pay the
investor (the ultimate owner of the mortgage debt) instead of the
borrower.
The government's guarantee of the mortgage loans assured
investors that
if the
borrower defaulted, they would be repaid in full.