Not exact matches
But neither can politics, particularly liberal democratic politics, function for long without reference to sustaining roots, and especially to assumptions about the
inviolable sources
of human dignity that can rightly
be called religious in character.
The value
of human dignity, which takes precedence over all political action and all political decision - making, refers to the Creator: Only He can establish values that
are grounded in the essence
of humankind and
are inviolable.
The
inviolable dignity of the
human person
is derived from and directed to that which transcends the authority
of the state.
The conception
of inviolable human dignity,
of constitutional limits upon central power,
of equality under law, and
of the free exchange
of goods and services in markets
is, again, part
of a preliberal legacy.
Inviolable human dignity, constitutional limits upon central power, and equality under law
are part
of a preliberal legacy.
And even more fundamentally, if we
are bearers
of inviolable dignity and a basic right to life in virtue
of our humanity, and not in virtue
of accidental qualities such as age, or size, or stage
of development or condition
of dependency --- if, in other words, we believe in the fundamental equality
of human beings --- how can a right to abortion (where «abortion» means performing an act whose purpose
is to cause fetal death)
be defended at all?
The centrepiece
of the UN Nations Charter
is the connection between the recognitionof the inherent
dignity of all members
of the
human family (and
of the
inviolable and inalienable
human rights which derive from that recognition) on the one hand, and peace and justice within and among nation states on the other.
There
are actually several points that make it different: The European charter
of fundamental rights states in its very first article that
human dignity is inviolable.