In August, federally funded work on stem cells was temporarily suspended after a judge ruled that work on hESCs violates a legal amendment in 1995 forbidding funding of any experiments that
involve destruction of human embryos.
For that matter, even when perfected, this method will always
involve the destruction of a human embryo, the one whose nucleus is removed.
Five days earlier, 70 House members led by abortion opponent Jay Dickey (R - AR) had written an equally harsh letter to Shalala, complaining that HHS is misreading a recent law that bans U.S. funding of research that
involves the destruction of human embryos.
At first blush, these words, known as the Dickey - Wicker Amendment, might appear to prohibit government funding of ESC research altogether, because ESC research necessarily
involves the destruction of human embryos.
Not exact matches
ANT - OAR accomplishes this same goal, however, by using an approach that does not
involve the generation and
destruction of human embryos.
«There are perfectly ethical ways
of obtaining stem cells to cure disease, which do not
involve embryo destruction, so no matter what moral value one places on the
human embryo, we do not need to use it.»
By Young Chung, Irina Klimanskaya, Sandy Becker, Tong Li, Marc Maserati, Shi - Jiang Lu, Tamara Zdravkovic, Dusko Ilic, Olga Genbacev, Susan Fisher, Ana Krtolica, and Robert Lanza To date, the derivation
of all
human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines has
involved destruction of embryos.
He could have left the funding
of research
involving cell lines created by the
destruction of human embryos in place, and led the charge to promote ethically unproblematic non-embryo-destructive forms
of stem cell science.