«Even where New York Courts have suspended attorneys for substantial periods of time, those cases
involve more
egregious and ongoing
acts of misconduct, as opposed to Mr. Grimm's isolated and singular conviction,» his attorney Annette Hasapidis said in the Manhattan federal court filing from earlier this month.
However, asking a seller if there's «anything» within the structure that «could» negatively effect a buyers» decision may be even a worse solution, anything and could are in my opinion too broad... the precedent case that's being examined says the Realtor has an obilgation to go beyond that stated by the seller... therefore what the seller has said or signed that they said is of little relevance in the event of a problem... her most
egregious act was not invoving a home inspector... people... find a couple inspectors that you yourself find to be valuable, recommend them to your buyers and
involve yourself, go to the inspections with your buyers and see firsthand what condition the property is in.