Not exact matches
Clearly he got what prisoners might call «a touch» because that
sentence is very lenient and well below the usual
guideline used by judges in cases
involving illegal firearms.
I am home from the terrific Miami FSG conference (kudos to everyone
involved), and on the way I was thinking about Judge Rakoff's decision this past week to give an enormous variance — the largest I have seen — to a corporate president who apparently faced a life
sentence under the
guidelines after a fraud conviction that resulted in $ 260 million in losses (basics here).
Second, even if the
guidelines are deemed non-severable only in cases with Blakely factors, Martha's lawyers might claim now that her case
involves a Blakely factor so she can argue for a lower
sentence under the government's non-severability theory.
This may in essence be the problem with any formulaic
guidelines in the context of the
sentencing of offences which often arise in unique circumstances and
involve a wide variety of potential defendants.