Sentences with phrase «involved in a rear end collision»

1998), Here, Dr. Houss was involved in a rear end collision.

If you are involved in a rear end collision and suffer losses, you must prove the fault of the other driver or negligent party in order to recover compensation.

$ 28,000 settlement in favor of a mother and daughter involved in a rear end collision resulting in soft tissue damage to the mother and daughter.

In today's case (Suthakar v. Humble) the Plaintiff was involved in a rear end collision in 2011.

For those involved in a rear end collision, it is important to understand that in Florida the rear driver is presumed to be negligent or presumed to be the at fault driver.

In today's case (Cyr v. Kopp) the Plaintiff was involved in a rear end collision in 2011.

In today's case (Wallman v. John Doe) the Plaintiff was involved in a rear end collision in 2006.

Not exact matches

Accident reported, vehicle involved in a rear - end collision with another motor vehicle, airbags did not deploy.

CARFAX shows Wisconsin damage report on 05/05/2011: accident reported, vehicle involved in a rear - end collision, involving front impact with another motor vehicle, very minor damage reported, airbags did not deploy; Indiana damage report on 10/22/2011: Accident reported involving right rear impact with another motor vehicle, damage reported to: right rear, right rear primarily damaged, airbags did not deploy.

Accident reported, vehicle involved in a rear - end collision involving rear impact, rear primarily damaged.

Chrysler already has a tarnished image with the NHTSA thanks to rupturing fuel tanks on Jeep Liberty and Grand Cherokee vehicles when involved in a rear - end collision and a slow - paced response to the Takata airbag recall.

CARFAX shows California damage report on 05/24/2007: accident reported, vehicle involved in a rear - end collision, airbags did not deploy.

In today's case (Davidge v. Fairholm) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2009 rear end collisioIn today's case (Davidge v. Fairholm) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2009 rear end collisioin a 2009 rear end collision.

Because of the open air design of motorcycles and other two - wheel vehicles, drivers and passengers are more exposed to greater physical damage when involved in a rear - end or front - end collision, T - bone accident and other serious crashes.

Every day, hundreds of motorists are involved in crashes across the nation, from rear - end collisions to head - on accidents.

Although not common, motorists can be found partly or even wholly at fault after being involved in a rear - end collision.

One common scenario in rear - end collisions is multi-car accidents in which the first vehicle strikes another car, and the force pushes that vehicle into another motorist, at times triggering a chain reaction that can involve multiple vehicles.

Depending on the speeds involved, the consequences of a rear - end collision can include whiplash injuries, herniation, and in serious cases, a rear - end collision can lead to fatal injuries, especially if the vehicle in the front was a mini-van with a short rear crumple zone or a particularly small vehicle.

A few years ago, Marilyn Cronan was involved in a rear - end collision with a vehicle in which Yolanda Marcellus was a passenger.

For most people involved in a Florida rear - end collision, the «presumption of negligence» is a legal doctrine that comes into play only if the case becomes a lawsuit and that lawsuit makes it to the jury.

Car accidents (and truck accidents) involving a «rear - end collision» usually happen as a result of a driver who fails to stop the vehicle and crashes into the vehicle in front of it (a common cause is some type of distracted driving, like texting while driving or talking on a cell phone).

The physical forces involved in a rear - end collision may cause a person's head and neck to be thrown forward and then violently back.

In today's case (Reilander v. Campbell) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2006 rear - end collisioIn today's case (Reilander v. Campbell) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2006 rear - end collisioin a 2006 rear - end collision.

In the recent case (Alafianpour - Esfahani v. Jolliffe) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2012 rear end collision that the Defendant was responsible foIn the recent case (Alafianpour - Esfahani v. Jolliffe) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2012 rear end collision that the Defendant was responsible foin a 2012 rear end collision that the Defendant was responsible for.

In today's case (Smith v. Evashkevich) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2010 rear end collision that the Defendant admitted fault foIn today's case (Smith v. Evashkevich) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2010 rear end collision that the Defendant admitted fault foin a 2010 rear end collision that the Defendant admitted fault for.

Besides rear - end collisions, a car making a left turn is almost always found to be at - fault when there is a crash involving a car coming straight in the other direction.

Maryland State Highway Administration studies have shown that rates of overall accidents, sideswipe and rear - end collisions, and accidents involving trucks are significantly more common along the Maryland portion of the Capital Beltway than in the rest of the state.

Case Overview Our client was involved in a tragic rear end collision that resulted in the loss of their 24 year old son.

If you are involved in a rear - end collision in Florida, the rear - end accident is usually that driver's fault.

In this week's case (Olson v. Yelland) the plaintiff was involved in a 2012 rear end collisioIn this week's case (Olson v. Yelland) the plaintiff was involved in a 2012 rear end collisioin a 2012 rear end collision.

In a rear - end collision, for example, the occupants of the vehicles involved are «protected» by several feet of steel, the bumper, trunk or the engine.

Illinois is not a no - fault state when it comes to considering car insurance coverage in a rear - end collision involving a big rig.

In the recent case (Jones v. McLerie) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2011 rear - end collision that the Defendant admitted fault foIn the recent case (Jones v. McLerie) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2011 rear - end collision that the Defendant admitted fault foin a 2011 rear - end collision that the Defendant admitted fault for.

Drivers and passengers involved in a rear - end collision should get checked out by their doctor for whiplash damage as soon as possible following an accident, even if the fender - bender seemed minor or occurred at a low speed.

This time she was a passenger and again her vehicle was involved in a rear - end collision.

Some rear end collisions result in no damage to the cars, and limited injury to the parties involved in the crash.

In today's case (Mavi v. Booth) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2006 rear - end collision in Langley, BIn today's case (Mavi v. Booth) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2006 rear - end collision in Langley, Bin a 2006 rear - end collision in Langley, Bin Langley, BC.

In today's case (Deventer v. Woods) the Plaintiff was involved in 3 rear - end collisionIn today's case (Deventer v. Woods) the Plaintiff was involved in 3 rear - end collisionin 3 rear - end collisions.

In today's case (Dolha v. Heft) the Plaintiff was involved 2008 rear end collision.

In today's case (Gatari v. Wheeler, BCPC Victoria Registry File No. 080409) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2007 rear end collision near Duncan, BIn today's case (Gatari v. Wheeler, BCPC Victoria Registry File No. 080409) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2007 rear end collision near Duncan, Bin a 2007 rear end collision near Duncan, BC.

Because whiplash is most often seen in rear - end and side - impact collisions, distracted and drunk driving are often involved.

In today's case, (Harmati v. Williams) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2011 rear end collision that the Defendant accepted fault foIn today's case, (Harmati v. Williams) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2011 rear end collision that the Defendant accepted fault foin a 2011 rear end collision that the Defendant accepted fault for.

In today's case (Beaton v. Perkes) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2012 rear end collision the Defendant admitted fault foIn today's case (Beaton v. Perkes) the Plaintiff was involved in a 2012 rear end collision the Defendant admitted fault foin a 2012 rear end collision the Defendant admitted fault for.

Our firm represented a 51 - year - old executive and his wife in a case involving a rear - end collision involving an 18 - wheeler.