Sentences with phrase «involved seeing a lot more of»

It was slow - paced, which I typically enjoy, but considering that «slow pace» also involved seeing a lot more of a character that I thought was really fucking annoying wasn't all that enjoyable.

Not exact matches

lastly (and this is even more feelingsball than the first two points), I think a lot of the people involved here (coaches, players, media) don't really see this as corruption in the traditional sense.

Last but least Ozïl, the talent is there and we know it: on any given day at the top of his form he is arguably the best # 10 in the world and just need performances like this and the previous one to show it and remind everyone (what a pass for Giroud); will do a lot for his confidence and also felt he could've been more involved in the team play but that will come with game time (got 90 mins today)... Hopefully that doesn't stop until season's end and keep them passes and goals coming... Dare I say I would've love to see once a front of Alexis, Ozïl, Walcott / Chamberlaine and Cazorla (mouthwatering)!!!

A brand new science for studying this networked phenomenon, and in effect it's kind of a reverse engineering the World Wide Web that we know and the kinds of networks that we see on that to try to figure out how they took shape and maybe from that we can learn what principles involve and how networks do grow and you might be able to use that sort of thing to be able to develop a better system s for example being able to create more efficient networks and that could be very valuable in industry, there may be a lot of practical applications, involving protecting privacy, for example, and stopping people from stealing identities; and you should, you know, should be of just an interesting phenomenon.

And obviously, as the technology evolves and the creators get more involved and more savvy in creating new content and new story narratives for that form, I think that's where you'll see a lot of exciting things developing in digital.

And from what I saw of your presentation today, there's a lot more tweaking involved than most technical writers would be comfortable with.

I'd love to include a fascimile of my poppy (scrap) book, but So much of it involves written communication and photographs of private groups, the legal CYA is such a headache to even think about that I haven't done anything about writing it for years, though a lot of vets in general and the American Legion in particular would like to see more light shined on disabled vets.

And of course, when markets are at their peak, as we see today, we're seeing more and more inflows of equity type mutual funds, and when markets go down, then we see a lot of outflows of equity type mutual funds, so we're doing the exact opposite of what we should be doing because of the emotion that's involved with our money.

I see very few cases where employment is involved, and you'd see more because what happens in a situation where credit is used; you're supposed to get a notice saying this was denied to you, credit was denied or employment was denied to you on the basis of information in your credit report; and what happens is a lot of people go and pull their credit reports and then they find inaccuracies, and then they challenge those inaccuracies.

Nieves» standing sculptures tapped into other defining characteristics of many of the sculptural works included in Biennial: the figure or perhaps more accurately the fantastical figure, whether explicit or implicit, that also appeared, for example, in the floating, disquieting bodies of Ajay's Kurian's Childermass (2017) installed in the main stairwell of the Museum; the engagement with the everyday, as seen in Kaari Upson's dysmorphic, visceral transformations of furniture; and the fastidiousness of making, also visible in Samara Golden's The Meat Grinder's Iron Clothes (2017), which involved a lot of tedious labor, in this case the handmade, miniature pieces of furniture, treadmills, and medical equipment filling up the various vignettes comprising the piece.

Also, though it's not directly relevant to the issue of the most productive approach in terms of our own long term interests (which I think if people really understood this problem would involve a lot more fealty to moving off of FF now, and the idea of building even more coal plants — which are also responsible for most of the excess that allows bio accumulation of the serious neurological toxin mercury in our food supply, damages watersheds, mountain tops, sometimes whole communities and ecosystems, and, CC aside, is also very polluting — would be more apt to be seen as the idiocy it is), in some sense, no one has a full inherent right to anything really we as a world have built up: It has been a collective effort and you can only drive a Ferrari for instance, because of the hard work of countless others before you and along side you.

I went to the raw source (http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/people/melvin/PhilTrans2008/YamalADring.raw) but the format is a pain as it will involve lots of manipulation to put it into a format I can more easily use e.g. observation [i] = -LCB- tree, year, width, age -RCB--- I didn't see age in the raw data, is age just set as the first year for which there is a reading for the tree sample?

A lot of great people were involved with this project: green roof consulting from Green Roof Service, roof installation by US Roofing Corp., landscaping by Galbally Landscaping, and as you can see from the video credits — many more.

Which brings me to the point that surely you can agree with Jennifer on: In general the public debate should involve a lot more looking at the actual data (cf. business & economics reporting) than the «meta - debate» we so often see currently, and specifically that «ultimately, good policy is going to require that a much larger percentage of Australians have a higher level of scientific literacy.»