Sentences with phrase «involves challenging the decisions»

Not exact matches

Some of the most immediate challenges involve making a decision: Should an athlete continue his or her studies?

Still, Trump's deal with Carrier demonstrates the unprecedented challenge the president's conflicts of interest create: Unless he either puts his holdings in a truly blind trust or divests completely, a significant number of the decisions he makes will involve some level of financial incentive for himself as well as for the country.

Given the two clubs involved in the transfer talk, it will undoubtedly be a very difficult decision for the 22 - year - old to make if he has intentions of leaving Germany to start a fresh challenge as playing for Guardiola or Barca is a dream for many.

If you want your school to purchase more local foods, you need to understand the challenges and opportunities involved, so that you can work with key school decision - makers and the school meal program staff to figure out how to overcome them.

«The court found Mr. Brodsky's challenges to past NRC decisions regarding exemption requests to be «generally without merit,» but the court took issue with the NRC's process and the extent to which that process involved public participation.

Dixon filed suit, challenging the board's ruling in state Supreme Court based on a 2003 decision involving a legislative race in Colonie, and arguing he had recently been drawn out of the 4th: «Because the line was pushed to the middle of my road.

To respond to the challenges posed by the heavy load of cases involving complex scientific matters, generally, and by the post Daubert / Joiner decisions, particularly, AAAS has proposed a Demonstration Project that would identify highly - qualified, impartial experts to advise and educate the courts in the scientific and technical fields involved in the decisions they must make.

«It is now clear that almost from the outset decisions were made with too little analysis of the technical challenges involved,» said committee chairman Representative Sherwood Boehlert of New York at the hearing.

Challenging decisions involving questions of ethics, justice, and equity arise every day in classrooms, lunch cafeterias, and principals» offices.

If the lesson involves resolving certain challenges, incorporate a «Choose Your Own Adventure» story flow that directly involves learners while showing them both the pitfalls and payoffs of proper decision - making.

Deb Krizmanich was a team member leading a highly challenging project for a large technology firm that involved senior executives from many divisions around the world and she needed to get all of them together in one room for two days to get some key decisions made.

«The Equality Act 2010 outlines the obligation on all public sector organisations to challenge discrimination, involve disabled people in relevant decision - making and positively promote inclusion and equality.

The political argument for involving parents and other community members more substantially carries along with it an explicit challenge to the traditional, hierarchical leadership and power structures in schools.156 According to Leithwood and Prestine (2002), the policies and reforms that call for decentralized decision making rest on certain important assumptions about the role of the principal and other school leaders.

However, high stakes decisions involving tracking, grade promotion, admission to dual - credit courses and graduation based on a single testing event present major educational and motivational challenges.

The following lesson series will help students learn how a social decision - making / critical thinking / SEL framework can be used to meet the challenges involved in gathering and presenting the main points of an issue.

The first was a decision in New Mexico's Second Judicial District Court, where Judge Alan Malott dismissed a legal challenge to Albuquerque's Community Cats Project, a public - private partnership involving the Albuquerque Animal Welfare Department, Best Friends and PetSmart Charities ®.

The biggest challenge with diving is simply the cost involved (the financial dilemma seems to figure into just about every decision we make).

Not sure what that will be but it will involve «challenges, tough decisions and sacrifices» and feel like an alternate reality game come to life.

The case, which seems to have changed the previous assumption, involved a German challenge to the validity of a Council Decision establishing a position to be adopted on behalf of the EU at a session of the OTIF (Organization for International Carriage by Rail) Revision Committee concerning certain amendments to the Convention Concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF).

These decisions have involved constitutional challenges to...

However, as a fundamental purpose of ICS in CETA is to enable investors to challenge not only EU acts and decisions based on these acts, but also national acts which might involve EU law somehow, an ICS tribunal would have to interpret and give meaning to EU law.

That case was factually similar to the case at bar (involving a challenge to the inaccessibility of VIA's passenger rail cars) and involved an appeal from a decision of the same Agency.

Readers will gain an appreciation of what a long and arduous struggle is entailed in raising a Charter challenge, involving decisions by three levels of court, over a period of many years, culminating in Vriend in a ringing affirmation of the existence of gay and lesbian rights under s. 15 — the equality rights provision.

«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»

As a pupil, Zac was also involved in: R (on the application of RWE Generation UK Plc) v Gas and Electricity Markets Authority [2016] 1 CMLR 17, a challenge against a decision modifying the charges imposed on users of the National Grid (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); Speed Medical Examination Services Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 3585, a judicial review challenging reforms to the process for handling whiplash claims (as a pupil assisting Gerard Rothschild); and an application for interim relief by a company that had been redesignated under a European Union sanctions regime (as a pupil assisting Maya Lester).

The case involved legislation passed by Saskatchewan provincial government concerning essential services, but which effectively removed any right to strike from large portions of the public service without any meaningful mechanism to challenge the government's decisions concerning which services were essential.

However, a fundamental purpose of ICS in CETA is to enable investors, i.e. individuals, to challenge not only EU acts and decisions based on these acts, but also national acts which might involve EU law in some way, an ICS tribunal would necessarily remove disputes that involve EU law from the EU judiciary, consisting of national courts and the EU Courts, connected by Article 267 TFEU.

He was also co-counsel for JP and GJ at the Supreme Court of Canada in the November 2015 decision B010 v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) and was involved in litigation challenging changes to the Citizenship Act that allowed for the revocation of Canadian citizenship of individuals who had been convicted of certain crimes (treason, espionage, and terrorism).

He has extensive experience of public law, as is demonstrated by the reported cases set out below, and in particular has been involved in challenges to treatment decisions and appeals from the GDC and GMC.

LCIA arbitration and associated Commercial Court proceedings instructed unled against a QC involving a challenge to the sole arbitrator's decision that he did not have jurisdiction.

Vilgerts has been engaged by Proof IT to challenge the procurement decisions of the European Institute for Gender Equality involving the award of framework IT service contracts before the General Court of the EU.

We are also regularly instructed in high - profile challenges to the decisions of public authorities and regulators, including claims which require urgent applications for interim relief, and which involve complex issues of international, EU or human rights law in the commercial sphere.

He is involved in multiple follow - on claims arising out of headline cartel decisions and has also acted for listed companies and local authorities in high - value procurement challenges.

While the SCC and other levels of court do not usually give reasons for rejecting interveners or undoing the decision to reject interveners, the News Release provided some insight into the procedural challenges faced by the SCC when planning hearings involving multiple applications from potential interveners.

Duckenfield v South Yorkshire Police Commissioner [2015] EWHC 3149 (Admin) Challenge to a decision to cease funding the legal costs incurred by police officers involved in an inquest.

Possible topics about pedagogy include: • Structuring statutory drafting courses • Simulation courses designed using mock legislatures or committees • Course linkages with real - world legislators and special interest organizations • Service learning or clinical opportunities for law students • Courses focused on law reform efforts • How to employ Plain - English principles in statutory and rule drafting • Theoretical perspectives on statutory drafting • Involving political realities in law school drafting courses • Teaching practical aspects of drafting that addresses theories and principles of statutory interpretation and construction Possible topics about practice include: • Unique challenges of drafting laws and / or regulations in specific areas such as criminal law, environmental, health law, etc. • Lawyering for non-profits, federal and state agencies, local governments, and other clients in frequent need of rule - drafting • Practicing in employment law, health law, environmental law, and other heavily regulated fields where private clients require rule and policy drafting • Non-legal drafting opportunities, such as sports league rules, industry trade group policies, and university rules Possible topics about politics include: • Political influences affecting legislative drafting • Direct democracy and the unique challenges of drafting initiatives and referenda • The implications of special interests driving drafting decisions • Polictics and its influence on legislative history • Lobbyists as legislative drafters.

The basis on which such policy decisions can be challenged are narrow, involving questions of whether the Minister's decision is based on relevant considerations, if the Minister reasonably exercised or fettered their discretion, or if they had an open mind.

The two cases, each of which involves a challenge to sanctions levied against a student for creating a fake MySpace profile of a school principal, were re-heard en - banc on June 3rd with a decision to come.

There are relatively few reported decisions involving a successful challenge under the unfair relationships provisions of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Concerns have also been raised about the absence of a system of binding precedent, inconsistencies in decision - making, the cost and time involved in investment arbitration, lack of transparency and the very narrow grounds on which arbitral awards can be challenged.

We work with many different companies, and are involved in various associations such as Society for Human Resources Management (SHRM) and National Association for Professional Background Screening (NAPBS), giving us critical insight and expertise in the challenges and decisions faced by organizations today.

Treatment decisions involve all of the usual challenges of making high - stakes collaborative decisions, but they also usually include potentially severe consequences.

During my time as a conciliator / inspector with the Ontario New Home Warranty Program (now TARION) I had occasion to become involved with another conciliator's Tribunal case wherein a new home buyer had challenged the conciliator's decision that the new home was properly insulated and sealed against outside air infiltration.

Part Thirteen, Specimen Forms Part Thirteen, Form # A-1 — Request and Agreement to Arbitrate Part Thirteen, Form # A-2 — Request and Agreement to Arbitrate (Nonmember) Part Thirteen, Form # A-3 — Notice to Respondent Part Thirteen, Form # A-4 — Response and Agreement to Arbitrate Part Thirteen, Form # A-5 — Grievance Committee Request for Information Part Thirteen, Form # A-6 — Response to Grievance Committee Request for Information Part Thirteen, Form # A-7 — Notice of Right to Challenge Tribunal Members Part Thirteen, Form # A-8 — Challenge to Qualifications by Parties to Arbitration Proceeding Part Thirteen, Form # A-9 — Official Notice of Hearing Part Thirteen, Form # A-10 — Outline of Procedure for Arbitration Hearing Part Thirteen, Form # A-10a — Outline of Procedure for Arbitration Hearing Involving a Request and a Counter-Request Part Thirteen, Form # A-11 — Certificate of Qualification Part Thirteen, Form # A-12 — Award of Arbitrators Part Thirteen, Form # A-13 — Request for Procedural Review Part Thirteen, Form # A-14 — Official Notice of Procedural Review Part Thirteen, Form # A-14a — Decision of the Procedural Review Hearing Tribunal Part Thirteen, Form # A-15 — Checklist of Professional Standards Concerns Part Thirteen, Form # A-16 — Seating Arrangements for Hearings Part Thirteen, Form # A-17 — Mediation Resolution Agreement Part Thirteen, Form # A-17a — Notice of Settlement, Withdrawal of Arbitration Request Part Thirteen, Form # A-18 — Arbitration Activity Report Part Thirteen, Form # A-19 — Sample Agreement to Establish Multi-Board (or Regional) Professional Standards Enforcement Procedures Part Thirteen, Form # A-20 — Appeal of Grievance Committee Dismissal or Classification of Arbitration Request Part Thirteen, Form # A-21 — Action of the Appeal Hearing Tribunal (Arbitration Request)