Sentences with phrase «involves claims brought against»

Nevertheless, the arguments are frequently crunched through, probably because of an important Illinois Supreme Court ruling from 1990 which is still good law, Rollins v. Ellwood, involving claims brought against a Baltimore police officer, among others, sounding in intentional tort for his role in the apprehension of a misidentified criminal defendant and Illinois resident in Illinois, for which the Court found the officer was not subject to Illinois jurisdiction.

Not exact matches

The case involved a claim of attempted monopolization levied against Uber, brought by the Philadelphia Taxi Association and a number of individual taxi drivers.

In his judgment summary, Justice Martin said although Mr Marsh and his wife brought two causes of action against Mr Baxter - common law negligence involving the breach of a duty to ensure there was no escape of GM material, and the tort of private nuisance - they claimed only financial loss.

There was also a lawsuit in San Diego brought against the city and various animal welfare groups and advocates involved with passing the ordinance, but the claims against animal welfare groups were dismissed and the pet store owner bringing the suit ultimately dropped it against the city of San Diego.

Mesa Law Firm successfully represented its client in a commercial litigation matter it brought against an individual involving claims of misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, tortious interference with business relationships, defamation and injunctive relief.

If your cosmetic surgery went wrong, you may be entitled to bring a cosmetic surgery compensation claim against the doctors involved.

On the heels of three cases involving military members injured «off of the battlefield,» the United States Supreme Court passed the Feres Doctrine in 1950, making these individuals and their families unable to bring a claim against the federal government for such.

Erste Group AG v Red October (with Richard Snowden QC and Richard Morgan QC): conspiracy claims brought by an Austrian bank against Russian state entities involving allegations that a corporate borrower was stripped of its assets and forced into insolvency to avoid its liabilities under a US$ 80 million loan facility.

Compelling to arbitration — and ultimately obtaining dismissal with prejudice of all claims — a statewide putative class and representative action brought against a craft store chain in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California that involved meal and rest break, failure to pay wages, inaccurate wage statements, unfair business practices, and PAGA claims;

The action involved a claim brought by James Riley («Riley»), a 14 - year - old boy who lost his eye, against Ryan Reeb («Reeb»).

The issue was whether the principle provided a defence to a claim brought by a company involved in a fraud, against a third party, in respect of losses suffered as a result of the fraud.

If you were involved in an accident where this may not have been the case, you may consider bringing a personal injury claim against the driver or trucking company.

He was involved in litigation about the LMX spiral and claims brought by Lloyd's names against underwriters and agents, and has acted in disputes about both proportional and non-proportional reinsurance.

Nearly half of the medical malpractice claims brought against physicians and healthcare facilities every year involve some sort of misdiagnoses.

«TCC claims 2.1 The following are examples of the types of claim which it may be appropriate to bring as TCC claims --(a) building or other construction disputes, including claims for the enforcement of the decisions of adjudicators under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996; (b) engineering disputes; (c) claims by and against engineers, architects, surveyors, accountants and other specialised advisers relating to the services they provide; (d) claims by and against local authorities relating to their statutory duties concerning the development of land or the construction of buildings; (e) claims relating to the design, supply and installation of computers, computer software and related network systems; (f) claims relating to the quality of goods sold or hired, and work done, materials supplied or services rendered; (g) claims between landlord and tenant for breach of a repairing covenant; (h) claims between neighbours, owners and occupiers of land in trespass, nuisance etc; (i) claims relating to the environment (for example, pollution cases); (j) claims arising out of fires; (k) claims involving taking of accounts where these are complicated; and (l) challenges to decisions of arbitrators in construction and engineering disputes including applications for permission to appeal and appeals.»

Mass tort litigation typically has three distinctive characteristics: they must involve a large volume of claims brought against the same product or circumstance, the underlying facts of each claim must be similar, and the claims should be complementary to one another.

Co-wrote an appellate brief whereby the federal district court reversed a bankruptcy court and ruled that an architect could bring a third - party claim involving a large public project against a consultant who had previously obtained a discharge in bankruptcy.

Paul Key QC and Siddharth Dhar acted for the Republic of Kazakhstan in major 7 - day Commercial Court trial involving detailed allegations of Kazakh and Lebanese law relating to very significant claims brought against the State by Ruby Roz, a Kazakh poultry farm company.

This type of claim can be brought against the obstetrician caring for the pregnant women during the pregnancy, the doctor who delivered the child, the nurses and medical caregivers involved in your labor or the medical facility at which your child's birth took place.

Cases involving Medicare fraud, defense contractor fraud and other types of fraud against the federal government and states brought under the False Claims Act and similar state whistleblower laws.

If you or a loved one has been involved in an accident with a commercial vehicle, you may be entitled to recover compensation for your injuries by bringing a legal claim against the responsible parties.

Multi-district litigation (MDL) is a federal legal procedure for complex civil actions involving people in multiple districts who are all bringing a similar claim against the same party or parties.

If you were a passenger in a vehicle that suffered a rollover accident due to the driver's negligence, or if you were involved in a crash in which another vehicle collided with your vehicle and sent you into a rollover, you can bring a negligence claim against that driver to recover compensation.

CNA states that of all the claims brought against hospitals, those involving death predominate over all others.

Ms. Tomasco provided an overview of trends in litigation brought by providers against managed care organizations, for example, antitrust claims, suits involving claims for payment under benefit assignment agreements, network participation claims, and contract disputes.

If you or a loved one has been involved in an accident with a commercial truck, you may be entitled to recover compensation for your injuries by bringing a legal claim against the responsible parties.

Obtained a defense jury verdict in a case involving claims brought under the Maryland Consumer Protection Act (MCPA) against a restoration and remodeling contractor before the District Court for Harford County.

I have relied on the Law Office of Patrick Conkey for all of my legal matters for over two decades, and I will continue to rely on this law firm in the future for advice and representation in business litigation; and for personal injury claims that I have brought for accidents which were not my fault; and for insurance claims against both my insurance company, and the responsible party's insurance company in accident cases in which I was involved.

Often a claim for barrister Negligence would also involve bringing a concurrent claim against the solicitor, who was also acting in the claim, for solicitor Negligence.

While the criminal proceedings might involve a determination of what restitution is to be made to you, the victim in the incident, it isn't designed for that purpose, which is why we have civil courts in which you can bring a civil claim (likely of negligence) against the drunk driver who caused the accident in which you were injured.

Kathy has also defended an international dialysis services provider against RICO claims in federal court based on allegedly fraudulent billing activity, represented a pharmaceutical services provider in a billing dispute with a chain of nursing homes, defended home health agencies in suits brought by employees pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, and represented other providers and associations of providers as plaintiffs and defendants in a variety of matters in federal and state court involving issues ranging from contract interpretation to cash receipts assessments to the federal Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

Bus accident lawsuits are generally complex and often involve assessing liability and bringing claims against third parties - such as an insurance company.

Acting for the liquidators of the Rangers football club, bringing substantial fraud claims against individuals involved in the takeover of the club.

Zelle's financial services team recently successfully defended a class action brought against a large bank involving claims of breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and violations of a state consumer protection statute.

If you or a loved one has been injured in an accident involving a commercial truck, you may be entitled to recover compensation for your injuries by bringing a legal claim against the responsible parties.

Not surprisingly, the three longest decisions of the year were in complex commercial cases, one involving alleged inducement to make a multi-million dollar loan (VTB Capital plc v Nutritek [2013] UKSC 5), another on how to calculate the value of unjustly received services (Benedetti v Sawiris [2013] UKSC 50), and the third relating to the settlement of a claim brought by shipowners against insurers (The Alexandros T [2013] UKSC 70).

Just days after affirming an administrative law judge's decision to dismiss price fixing claims brought under Section 337 against numerous foreign steel companies for failing to plead «antitrust injury» (see our prior post), the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has issued a notice announcing institution of another investigation involving antitrust claims (Certain Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Inv.

As legal secretary to the CAT he was involved in all the first «landmark appeals against the decisions of the OFT and sectoral regulators under the Competition Act 1998, reviews of merger control decisions under the Enterprise Act 2002 and the first «follow on» claims for damages brought in the Tribunal under the 1998 Act.