Not exact matches
Proving a design defect
involves passing
judgment on technical choices and usually requires
expert testimony.
Notable mandates: Represented physicians
involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of
judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and
experts in preparation of
expert reports.
[6]... Summary
judgment applications are not a substitute for trial and thus will seldom prove suitable for resolving conflicts in
expert testimony particularly those
involving difficult, complex policy issues with broad social ramifications.
He has served as arbitrator, counsel, and
expert witness in commercial and investor - state disputes under the ICC, ICSID, UNCITRAL, and VIAC rules, and has litigated complex transnational matters in the U.S. courts, including actions
involving the enforcement of foreign law and foreign
judgments.
Quinn Emanuel engaged in almost five years of fact and
expert discovery
involving more than 1.4 million documents, thirty
expert witnesses, and approximately 170 fact and
expert depositions in addition to briefing summary
judgment and pre-trial motions.
The research design for generating work values score profiles for 1,122 different careers
involved obtaining score profiles from two sources: a) regression equations that produced estimated work values scores, and b) an SME (Subject Matter
Expert) study in which work values scores were derived from
expert judgments of occupational analysts.
If you anticipate or are already
involved in a dissolution matter, or even if you already have orders or a
judgment regarding child support or child custody, you might benefit from speaking with one of the child support and child custody
experts at the Law Collaborative, Los Angeles.