They can both be true, but we always choose to tell one instead of the other, because
it involves less conflict and ambiguity.
Not exact matches
Russia's backing of Serbia isn't exactly a new development - previously, a
less - known
conflict involving Serbia got Russia
involved in certain unpleasantness with a couple of other countries on European continent.
One could frame the debate in the advantages of using
less fossil fuel, which range from lower costs to people (an all electric car has operating costs about 1/4 that of a gasoline vehicle), to balance of payments (
less capital flowing out of the country, especially relevant to countries who import most of their oil), to terrorism (not funding it, and western influence leaving the ME, which is the basis of most ME terrorist organizations) to
conflict in general (most of the major
conflicts in the last 30 years have
involved ME oil), to finite supply (when we run out, we'll be facing a global economic meltdown).
It may
involve conflict management, in which the parties continue the
conflict but adopt
less extreme tactics; settlement, in which they reach agreement on enough issues that the
conflict stops; or removal of the underlying causes of the
conflict.
Mediation and collaborative law are much
less formal than the court process and therefore makes the parties
involved in the
conflict feel more comfortable.
Instead, parenting coordination offers parents
involved in high -
conflict disputes the consistent, ongoing direction of a single, qualified professional using a
less adversarial,
less expensive dispute resolution process.
As mediation requires the consent of both parties
involved, it is substantially
less conflict ridden,
less costly, and a far more efficient way to settle the end of a relationship.
Involve non-lawyers in the process also, so that some contributors are
less susceptible to the
conflicting demands of court and client deadlines.
There are several reasons: (a) it's
less adversarial than going to court; (b) it's more private; (c) you retain control of the process — i.e., you are not bound by what the mediator thinks (indeed, most mediators see their role as helping the parties effectuate their goals, not imposing the mediator's ideas); (d) it's usually much
less expensive; (e) if there are children
involved, the process is
less likely to embroil them in a painful
conflict; and (f) mediation often gives divorcing couples a better chance of successfully negotiating issues that may come up in the future (such as child support, alimony, or custody and visitation issues).
They argued that this negativity would then spill over into the dating relationship (e.g., more
conflict and
less trust), and, in turn, increase the likelihood that the kids become
involved in a violent relationship.2 The general thinking is illustrated below:
For example, on again - off again relationships tend to have greater
conflict,
less commitment, lower satisfaction, and fewer positive behaviors (e.g., validating each other's feelings) than noncyclical relationships.1 Partners
involved in on again - off again relationships also report doing things that negatively impact the relationship, such as being
less cooperative, polite, and patient with each other.
A court may grant
less custody time to a parent who is
less encouraging of this or who tends to
involve the child in
conflicts between parents.
Promote family commitment to using
less verbal coercion and / or physical force, and to discuss any incidents
involving conflict, hostility, and the use of force that increase a family's risk of threats to personal safety or welfare.
Fact:» [1] Fathers who reported strong authoritarian views were
involved relatively
less in weekday caregiving, playing, teaching, and nighttime soothing and in weekend teaching during early infancy... Attitudes consistent with authoritarian parenting, in which demands for obedience and behavioral control of children are prominent, appear to have lasting, negative effects on fathering even early in life, long before parent - child
conflicts and matters of discipline become common...» [2] Consistent with prior work linking maternal attitudes and father involvement, fathers engaged in relativelyless caregiving, playing, and teaching on weekends during early infancy when their partners held highly protective attitudes... Although an initial lack of experience or support might be expected to diminish father involvement over time, relations between maternal protective attitudes and fathers» relative involvement did not hold longitudinally... the lack of longitudinal relations may suggest that father involvement is primarily self - determined and that mothers» attitudes are in part a consequence of how
involved fathers actually are in childrearing.»
I was looking forward to being
involved in
less conflict with my ex, not more.