Sentences with phrase «involves much thought»

Not exact matches

«I don't think he probably knew how much is involved in being the president.

You may joke that the week you went on vacation flew by far too quickly, but if you stop and think about it, that week actually seemed to last much longer than one involving the drudgery of your day job.

I'm pretty much obsessed with animals, so I thought I was going to be a vet until I saw my dog after surgery and realized there was blood involved.

While social influence behaviors like ingratiation are typically thought of as a dyadic phenomenon (that is, involving two people — the ingratiator and the ingratiated), these behaviors are actually embedded in a much more complex and dynamic work environment, which includes many other people.

But I was just amazed by how everyone, young and old wanted to be involved... and was so deeply enriched and touched by the experience and the laughter and the love I experienced from the people I met and how women would in particular open their hearts to me and tell me the stories of where they've come from, particularly because I have the language and was coming there as a woman and just how touched they were that I was there as a woman from England who's learned the language and who's an artist and running this project and come all the way to see them so they didn't feel forgotten I think that was pretty much what they felt... that their stories were being heard so they don't feel forgotten knowing the tents would be around the world.

Part of the planning process involves preliminary thinking on how to achieve initiatives and how much should be allocated to an expense or capital budget.

I think the biggest fumble I ever made was getting involved in a business I loved so much that I was blinded to the entrepreneur behind.

Yes our quality of life is still quite good relative to SOME other countries... that not really what people are thinking though when they use the term «3rd world country» — they are talking about the trending that they see — and the media reflects a perception out there that things are trending in a negative direction... look, if you read my original posts, you will see that they have much less to do with our economy as they have to do with WHY we are involved in the middle east and the SOCIAL impact of that.

It would probably involve CPR and / or a tracheotomy, although even then someone would undoubtedly think, «That woman spends way too much time watching Grey's Anatomy.»

(Pre-Thomist thought about God also involved a synthesis of Biblical and Greek categories and, therefore, posed much the same problems.)

What he concludes involves rejection of some traditional doctrines, but it resonates well with much biblical thinking and Christian experience.

April 1999), which shows that home schooling families are at least as involved in civic activities and the building of «social capital» as those who send their kids out for education, and she ends with this thought: «I don't think we need worry much about their socialization in the narrow sense, either.

The answer is that the things of God are only partly involved with solving problems and launching projects, as much as we might like to think that the whole of spirituality is involved with these activities!

Three of Aquinas» proofs involve infinite regress and there is no reason to think that god provides a terminator, much less the Christian god or any other god.

Think about how much incompetence that involves.

The problem is that organized religion is as much political animal as any other human convention involving more than 2 people, and spiritual, thinking individuals are intelligent enough to know that churches / mosques / community reprogramming centers actually have very little to do with what one actually believes...

I thought it was the Calvinism I was so heavily involved in until I notice the same behaviors among other men I admire just as much; Chay, Bing, Fruchtenbaum, Ryrie, Crouch and others, we were all doing it regardless of what you believed.

254) thought it absurd to maintain that the resurrection body would be involved in the passions of flesh and blood, and developed a view much closer to the Pauline teaching of the «spiritual body».

While with the World Council of Churches, he was closely involved in theological discussions in the ecumenical movement and contributed much to its thinking.

The mere fact that people are allowed to pay for their OWN abortion coverage, without federal money, is just too much for these people, which leads one to believe that people like the «Susan B. Anthony» List are malicious liars, though a fair amount of idiocy is involved in their thinking no one will call them on their lies.

In particular, he kept seeing the baffling personal injustice involved when «the wicked doth compass about the righteous,» and, even when he thought of the nation's collective problem, his solution was not so much to blame present social tragedy on antecedent social sin as to believe that justice, now denied, would come in time — «Though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not delay.»

That is why there is so much money involved: We think it is worth the investment to pay a sports hero more than, say, the President, because the former does a more important job.

I do not know how much LGBT is involve in promoting that their life style be taught as a norm in public schools, but it is entirely unnecessary and I think can cause little kids to be very confused.

I believe there is a grieving process involved with it, which I don't think is talked about much.

Whitehead always thought of interactions as (a) involving something much more general than the physical forces contemplated in classical dynamics, involving in fact specificities akin to those contemplated in Information Theory, but (b) always as active ingredients of processes.

Federal courts in Louisiana recently reached the conclusion that too much thinking about the difficult issues involved in evolution can be downright dangerous.

«Creationists may prefer not to think to much about the conspiratorial implications of what they're arguing, but creationism just won't work without the actual existence of such a «fraud so complex and extensive it involved every field from archaeology, paleontology, geology and genetics to biology, chemistry and physics.»

During the case, the police received much criticism for prejudiced attitudes towards black people, such as thinking that Lawrence must have been involved in crime to have provoked the attack.

When I first saw beetroot risotto I thought it would involve spiralized and riced beetroot (hmmm...) but this is much less faff.

I already had a lot of work to do with the other cake I was making for her and which was a fondant decorated cake, so I thought that the second cake should be something simple that did not involve so much work.

The future of medicine, if doctors have their way, will involve getting people to monitor their health without thinking much about it.

On the rare occasion I've made compound butter, it was on the fly and without much of a plan or thought process involved.

Also this recipe involved too much prep - I don't think cooking the puréed ingredients did anything other than dirty a pan.

I don't think there's enough kefir involved to make much difference to the flavour, but it does help with the rise.

I've got one for you: It's simple, quick, involves a vegetable that's in season across much of the the country, and really delicious (so I think).

My other variations on this concept have been huge reader hits, and I think you'll love this one just as much — I totally did — although I'm always up for anything involving the almond butter & jelly combo.

I always thought I had to make my mom's recipe, which involved separating eggs, folding the whites into the batter, etc... way too much trouble for the «meh» end result, to get a nice light honey cake.

Also, as much as I love the thought of Beth being back full - time (in any capacity) + having women involved in commentary, it seems like they could just use Renee Young for that role.

Remember he was sidelined (we think) because of a prank involving Wenger, and since then he has tried to prove himself off the bench sometimes with too much aggression resulting in red card incidents.

But knowing his attention to detail and how much he is involved in all the big decisions at Arsenal, you would think that Wenger would have a big say in who takes charge after him and I would also think that there have already been talks behind the scenes and maybe even some moves made about recruiting his successor.

Bellerin and Spain had the better stats but got hammered 3 - 0, I bet he thought he was involved in a club game for Arsenal...... when the season is over Sqnchez needs to take at least a month away from the game, to recover his form and confidence and most importantly to get some much needed rest

«But in the second year I felt a little bit left out wide and not getting so much of the ball but now I feel involved in the play and I think that is showing in the games — that I am able to assist goals and score goals.»

like I've said before, Wenger is simply stating that Sanchez is staying so that he can regain some leverage when it comes time to make a deal and to shift the focus back squarely on Sanchez... this is 101 tactics in PR management... the very fact that he even mentioned RVP's name speaks to the utterance arrogance of a man that believes he answers to no one... before you harshly judge Sanchez think carefully about what the ultimate intentions of both parties involved... Sanchez wants to win trophies and get paid generously for his efforts, whereas the club wants to pull the wool over our eyes once again so that we blame the player for wanting the very things we told him we wanted when we brought him in... how many times do we have to go down this road before we realize the only common factor in each of these scenarios is the club itself... trust me, if we showed any ambition Sanchez's contract demands would be much different... just like in other major sports players will take a «home town» discount if they see those in charge making a truly honest attempt to fight for the highest honours in their respective fields... that being said, if they see a team trying to make disparaging remarks about them in the press and not following through on their promises, they will likely try to make them pay a premium for their services or seek greener pastures... btw if anyone simply looks at the score versus Bayern today and thinks that even for a second that this was a deserved victory, just watch the game and judge for yourself... actually save yourself the anguish and just know that if it weren't for Cech and Martinez this could have been a repeat of our Champions League flopping or worse

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Hey guys I honestly don't think a lot of the names being mentioned would even consider joining arsenal... so I would immediately rule out allegri and Simeone... if I had to put together a list I think experience would be a huge factor... I know I might get some stick for this but my number 1 would be Rafa benitez... very experienced tactically flexible rotates his squad and hard to please players would have to earn their spot... no2 ancelotti don't have to say much his record speaks for itself only problem I think would be is that he criticized ozil in the past although grown men should be able to sort that out... no 3 Thomas tuchel plays electric brand if football got the best out of mkhitaryan and auba at Dortmund... no4 Laurent Blanc not sure why his name isn't in the ring did a fantastic job everywhere he managed no5brendan Rodgers he did a fantastic job at Liverpool vastly under rated... other names to ponder Luis Enrique zidane if available emery if available ps the only way Henry should become involved is as an assistant coach

Let's get the facts straight here.He never demanded # 400,000 a week.All that is just media talk.However, I support your point of the fact that him going does not mean disaster.We've survived with far better players leaving you know.If Arsenal had replaced Van Persie the season he left we would've challenged them for the title that season.However, at that time we were financially poor and had to settle for some second rate players.Now we are in a better financial position and I expect us to be more ambitious and that involves trying as much as possible to replace any player who leaves.This doom prediction doesn't show the character of a top club.Even Chelsea won't behave like how we do if they lost Hazard.I hate the way Arsenal allows players to treat it.I actually thought only smaller clubs behaved that way.

I think Smith is much better at improvising and will get Doctson more involved in this offense.

With the way many sections are using Open Divisions and competitive equity - based playoff bracketing now, we thought there was just a little too much guesswork involved.

Right, I think that's probably all the doom and gloom I can take for one day, because so much more of my life doesn't involve Arsenal and right now that feels like a massive blessing.

Despite not being directly involved with as much of the club's business as Woodward and company, the legend that is Sir Bobby Charlton has played a huge passive role in placating the fans» opposing thoughts of the Glazer's reign at Old Trafford.