Sentences with phrase «involving breach of fiduciary duties»

Call us for an evaluation of your business tort case involving breach of fiduciary duties.
Interviewed by Jeff Gray of The Globe and Mail concerning a recent Court of Appeal ruling involving breach of fiduciary duty, June 18, 2014.
Mr. Broderick also handles complex civil cases, including matters involving breach of fiduciary duty and securities fraud.
But most cases of nonprofit mismanagement involve breaches of fiduciary duty, not criminal behavior, often rooted in a sincere if ultimately misguided effort to help.
In the trust and estate litigation arena, he represents corporate trustees, individual trustees, personal representatives, and beneficiaries in disputes involving breaches of fiduciary duty, dissipation of trust or estate assets, and claims of lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence and fraud.
His trust and estate litigation practice includes representing corporate trustees, individual trustees, personal representatives and beneficiaries in disputes involving breaches of fiduciary duty, dissipation of trust or estate assets, and claims of lack of testamentary capacity, undue influence and fraud.
Representation of minority shareholders in home healthcare franchising companies in various state court litigation involving breach of fiduciary duty, breach of a shareholders» agreement, fraud and other tort claims, including successfully prosecuting charges for violation of court orders freezing millions of corporate funds, resulting in a civil contempt judgment that included a jail sentence.
Successfully obtained a plaintiff's jury verdict for a minority shareholder of a limited liability company providing care to developmentally - disabled adults in a case involving breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and trade secret allegations
Our lawyers represents D&O liability insurers, and their insured companies, directors and officers, in defense of claims involving breaches of fiduciary duties and claims arising under employment, environmental and securities laws.
a Malaysian - based investor in successfully obtaining a NZ$ 3m judgment against a former joint venture partner, involving breach of fiduciary duty and dishonest assistance claims
He represents clients in complex civil and commercial litigation, including extensive experience in securities litigation, product liability litigation, bankruptcy - related disputes, contract disputes, and disputes involving breaches of fiduciary duties by directors, officers, shareholders and partners.
Expert Opinions I have submitted expert opinions in several cases involving breaches of fiduciary duty through conflicts of interest, fee disputes, and attorney negligence.

Not exact matches

Representing financial service institutions in numerous lender liability cases involving allegations of fraud and breach of fiduciary duty.
Med Mining v Nusantara: acted as sole counsel in a substantial Commercial Court trial (against leading counsel for both other parties) relating to the activities of a mining company in the Far East, involving contractual claims and alleged fraudulent breaches of fiduciary duty.
Sole Arbitrator in shareholder dispute involving valuation of a stock put, breach of contract, and breach of fiduciary duty
We also represent clients in cases involving the churning of brokerage accounts, breach of fiduciary duty, unauthorized trading, and margin claims.
Med Mining and Minerals Limited v Nusantara (2015): acted as sole counsel in a substantial Commercial Court trial (against leading counsel for both other parties) relating to the activities of a mining company in the Far East, involving contractual claims and alleged fraudulent breaches of fiduciary duty.
Our Private Wealth and Fiduciary litigators represent clients in cases involving claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fiduciary misconduct and fraud, misfeasance and malfeasance in estate administration, investment mismanagement, financial elder abuse, and will and trust Fiduciary litigators represent clients in cases involving claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fiduciary misconduct and fraud, misfeasance and malfeasance in estate administration, investment mismanagement, financial elder abuse, and will and trust fiduciary duty, fiduciary misconduct and fraud, misfeasance and malfeasance in estate administration, investment mismanagement, financial elder abuse, and will and trust fiduciary misconduct and fraud, misfeasance and malfeasance in estate administration, investment mismanagement, financial elder abuse, and will and trust contests.
Mr. Voigt has tried cases involving personal injury defense, insurance defense, breach of contract, breach of technology / patent licensing agreements, breach of fiduciary duty, banking practices, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and wrongful termination of employment.
-- Hanco ATM Systems v. Cashbox ATM Systems [2007] EWHC 1599 (Ch): Led by Andrew Hochhauser Q.C. in relation to summary judgment application against senior employee for breach of fiduciary duty and dishonest assistance and involving issues as to the doctrine of «preparatory steps».
Our commercial litigation practice includes, but is not limited to, lawsuits involving Breach of Contract; Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Breach of Fiduciary Duty; Negligence; Fraud; Common Counts; Declaratory Relief; Specific Performance; Unfair Business Practices and partnership disputes.
He has a particular interest in claims involving allegations of breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty and undue influence.
Arish has acted on a wide array of commercial disputes in the English Courts and in English seated arbitrations, including cases involving civil fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, complex contractual claims, negligence claims, economic torts, shareholder, joint venture, partnership and insolvency disputes and jurisdictional battles (amongst others).
During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract disputes, civil RICO, ERISA, trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance disputes, minority shareholder disputes, partnership disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.
Tom has experience in claims pursuing and defending allegations of fraud and bad faith (including disputes involving claims of deceit, misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty and conspiracy).
Michael Muse - Fisher represents public and private companies in a variety of state, federal and administrative cases involving contract disputes, commercial litigation, licensing and intellectual property matters, eminent domain / inverse condemnation, government tort liability, breach of fiduciary duty, as well as land - related torts.
Mr. Rooney has also litigated cases involving covenants not to compete, claims of breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty, and defamation.
Representation of small and mid-sized Arizona companies in litigation involving claims of fraud, securities fraud, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and employment disputes.
Representation of a former partner in a multi-million dollar breach of contract / breach of partnership / breach of fiduciary duty case against former partners arising from a profit - sharing agreement and involving counterclaims of misappropriation of trade secrets and breaches of nondisclosure / non-solicitation agreements.
He is regularly instructed in substantial wrongful dismissal claims, typically involving serious allegations of wrongdoing, including dishonesty, and breach of directors» and fiduciary duties and diverting business opportunities.
There have been a number of high profile cases involving fakes and forgeries and alleged breaches of fiduciary duties where excessive agents» commissions have been charged, and it is clear that collectors, as well as the professionals within art galleries and auction houses, are vulnerable to fraud or unethical practices.
The most frequent breach of fiduciary duty litigation involves a partner, officer, or trusted advisor's self - dealing.
$ 1,141,000.00 TRIAL JUDGMENT — Breach of Fiduciary Duty This case involved allegations of a breach of fiduciary obligaBreach of Fiduciary Duty This case involved allegations of a breach of fiduciary oblFiduciary Duty This case involved allegations of a breach of fiduciary obligabreach of fiduciary oblfiduciary obligations.
Arbitrated a dispute between a Japanese appliance manufacturer and its U.S. Distributor involving claims of breach of joint venture agreement and breach of fiduciary duty
Litigated breach of fiduciary duty claims involving corporations, trusts, estates, and partnerships.
She has represented corporations, executives, and other individuals in government and internal investigations, criminal proceedings, and civil litigation involving allegations of securities and accounting fraud, antitrust violations, and breach of fiduciary duty.
DEG - Deutsche Investitions («DEG») v Koshy and Gwembe Valley Development Co v Koshy and related actions Acted for a state - owned German bank in a long running dispute arising out of an investment in Zambia, involving originally insolvency issues and claims in fraud and for breach of director's fiduciary duties.
Represented a major electronics / defense firm in a case involving allegations of lost profits resulting from alleged breaches of fiduciary duties and tortious interference with contracts in connection with an alleged joint venture relationship.
Willie has prosecuted and defended claims involving breach of contract, tortious interference, state and federal antitrust, common law and statutory fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, negligent misrepresentation, business disparagement, state and federal securities actions, product liability, nuisance, trespass, conversion, insurance coverage, corporate governance, breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, and qui tam.
Mr. Moreno has successfully represented clients in claims involving breach of contract, unfair business practices, false advertising, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, wrongful foreclosure, unfair debt collection, unfair credit reporting, unjust enrichment, misappropriation of trade secrets, quiet title, emotional distress, and receiverships, among others.
Peter has handled well in excess of 1000 securities litigation matters involving claims for violation of federal and state securities laws, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, unauthorized trading, unsuitability, elder abuse and related claims.
She won a case involving insurance breach of fiduciary duty when customers of a Lavaca County restaurant became sick with Hepatitis A.
Stephen also frequently represents businesses in commercial / business disputes involving allegations of fraud, breach of contract, violations of fiduciary duties and other tortious conduct, and violations of various federal and state statutes.
His business litigation work includes trying cases involving intellectual property disputes, breaches of contract and fiduciary duties, business torts, corporate espionage, defamation, whistleblowing and qui tam actions and securities fraud.
He manages all aspects of litigation and consistently obtains favorable outcomes, from early dismissals and resolutions to verdicts, for clients in business litigation disputes involving breach of contract and fiduciary duties, restrictive covenants, business dissolutions, partnerships and joint ventures, derivative corporate claims, note defaults and workouts, and intellectual property.
David Joseph has acted as Sole or Junior Counsel in a number of complex fraud actions involving inter alia complex interlocutory relief, recovery of stolen property, resolution of disputes between shareholders / partners, allegations of fraud and deceit, breach of fiduciary duty and restraint of use of performance bonds and letters of credit.
Michelle R. Rack brings her considerable litigation experience to the Firm to serve clients involved in disputes arising in the context of contested wills and trusts and breaches of fiduciary duty requiring the judicial removal of executors and trustees, as well as conservators and attorneys - in - fact engaging in financial exploitation of vulnerable seniors.
In court, his practice covers not only the general range of commercial disputes embraced in his arbitration practice but in addition he has appeared as Counsel in a number of fraud actions involving recovery of stolen property, Ponzi schemes, resolution of disputes between shareholders / joint venturers, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious conspiracy, professional negligence, structured financial products including Islamic finance.
Acting and advising in an arbitration involving claims of breach of trust, fiduciary duty and contract in the context of the sale and supply of oil;
The case involved allegations that of shams agreements, allegedly entered into to defraud HMRC, along with allegations of breach of fiduciary duty and exclusion from the running of the business.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z