Not exact matches
It may also become increasingly difficult for any argument against any
research on early
embryos to command a hearing (including arguments against «therapeutic» cloning) as other procedures that
involve embryo selection and disposal become more common.
Former Governor Martin O'Malley (D — MD) has supported stem - cell
research involving human
embryos (although he is a devout member of the Catholic Church, which has opposed many forms of embryonic stem cell
research).
They then argue that «By creating a financial incentive for embryonic stem cell
research — an incentive that by NIH's own admission
involves investments of «hundreds of millions of dollars» — and by specifying the precise means by which
embryos must be destroyed in order to qualify for federal funding, the NIH necessarily and knowingly subjects
embryos to a substantial risk of injury or death.»
► The U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) has put funding on hold for experiments that
involve «mixing human stem cells into very early animal
embryos and letting them develop» while it «reconsiders its rules» for this type of
research, Gretchen Vogel reported Wednesday.
The report, from a committee made up of 11 members of Parliament, also recommends legalizing
research involving embryos of chimeras and hybrids, which includes cells created by fusing human and animal nuclei.
«Both initial
research and ultimately treatment
involves early
embryos or eggs,» says Leach Scully.
By that reasoning, even
research involving a propane tank that took place in a lab adjacent to a place where
embryos were stored would violate the law, the opinion says.
It is dominated by Republican appointees, but some observers believe that is irrelevant because the legal issues do not
involve the ethics of
research involving embryos, but whether the courts should defer to the way several Administrations have interpreted Dickey - Wicker.
NIH has had an unwritten moratorium on
research involving human
embryos and in vitro fertilization since the early 1980s.
But last April he also voted for the HOPEAct, a Bush - supported «compromise» bill that would open up federal funding for
research that does not
involve the creation, destruction, or injury of
embryos; seeing as there are not yet any embryonic stem cells lines that meet this condition (ACT hasn't yet proven that their technique poses no «risk of injury»), the HOPE funding would only be available for non-embryonic stemcells.
In an advance that could solve many of the ethical and technical issues
involved in stem cell
research, two groups of scientists have independently converted human skin cells directly into stem cells without creating or destroying
embryos.
A week later, a network of stem - cell researchers, bioethicists and policy experts called the Hinxton Group, said that after meetings in Manchester, UK, they had concluded that
research involving genome editing in human
embryos has «tremendous value to basic
research».
Five days earlier, 70 House members led by abortion opponent Jay Dickey (R - AR) had written an equally harsh letter to Shalala, complaining that HHS is misreading a recent law that bans U.S. funding of
research that
involves the destruction of human
embryos.
In particular, the
research identified several genes regulated by methylation in the egg that are
involved in cell adhesion and migration — both vital properties for cells of the developing placenta in establishing connections with maternal tissues to support
embryo development.
In 1994, when the federal government was contemplating funding for
research involving human embryos, the NIH Embryo Research Panel concluded that just this kind of experiment was ethically appr
research involving human
embryos, the NIH
Embryo Research Panel concluded that just this kind of experiment was ethically appr
Research Panel concluded that just this kind of experiment was ethically appropriate.
At first blush, these words, known as the Dickey - Wicker Amendment, might appear to prohibit government funding of ESC
research altogether, because ESC
research necessarily
involves the destruction of human
embryos.
Federal officials are proposing to end a moratorium on funding for
research that
involves transplanting human stem cells into animal
embryos, a controversial practice that produces organisms know as «chimeras.»
Finally, he opened the door to funding
research involving stem cell lines created by producing human
embryos by somatic cell nuclear transfer or other means specifically for
research in which they are killed.
For now, at least, there will be no funding of
research involving embryos created just for destruction.
He could have left the funding of
research involving cell lines created by the destruction of human
embryos in place, and led the charge to promote ethically unproblematic non-embryo-destructive forms of stem cell science.
But stem cells are a hot political topic, because
researching stem cells from human
embryos typically
involves destroying those
embryos.