Sentences with phrase «involving human judgment»

Of course, in the end, in anything involving human judgment, there's a little subjectivity, but College Insider's poll and definition of who is and isn't included carries a bit more weight than blog commenters.

He insisted: «This is not an exact science, it involves human judgment.»

Not exact matches

Secondly, because May's ties propositions to human consciousness, he must involve propositions in judgments of truth or falsity.

After all, though storms are lifeless and soulless, when God commands people to carry out His judgment He is commanding humans to take the life of other humans thereby involving them in His questionable actions.

Such a hope has to be involved with social planning, though with the constant provision that our human plans are likely to be short - sighted, onesided and in need of the judgment by a wider vision of justice.

There will never be unanimity on all these judgments, precisely because it is so difficult to balance the competing parts of the convention on human rights and the competing interests involved.

Needless to say, reducing 14 chapters of material to 31 pages involves a great deal of fallible human judgment.

This judgment has also come along at a time when the European Court of Human Rights» decision is awaited in the four conjoined cases of Ladele, Eweida, Macfarlane and Chaplin, all of which involve issues of religious freedom and two of which involve the same potential conflict between the right not to be discriminated against on grounds of sexual orientation and the right to religious freedom (see our posts here, here and here).

On the human side, it is creativity, judgment and empathy that are involved in non-routine tasks.

There is extensive evaluation in Keehan J's judgment of the Human Rights considerations involved in publicising the names of the men but none when considering the substance of the injunctions.

When taken together with the linked judgment handed down in Rahmatullah No 2, the Supreme Court has now given authoritative guidance as to how far English Courts should be constrained in their willingness to entertain claims involving allegations of fundamental human rights breaches on the part of foreign states, and the complicity of English officials in such breaches.

Their reaction can be a refusal to give effect to an act of the IO, following a finding that the act was outside the scope of authority of the IO -LSB-...] or incompatible with another set of norms, be it international norms (such as a jus cogens norm or a human rights norm) or a norm of the domestic legal order that has precedence over the act of the IO (such as the practice of the German constitutional court in the cases involving judgments of The ECJ and the EctHR).»