This is the first U.S. Supreme Court case
involving judicial campaign conduct since 2002's Republican Party of Minnesota v. White.
Not exact matches
[4] The petitions sought to amend the
Judicial Code of Conduct to provide that recusal is not required in a proceeding based solely on any endorsement or receipt of a lawful
campaign contribution from a party or entity
involved in the proceeding.
The MOJ had a number of specific concerns about the use of the
judicial review process including its use as a
campaigning tactic and the delays and costs
involved in the process...
I have run the marketing or been
involved in the marketing for
campaigns for State Prosecutor, Associate Circuit Judge, Circuit Judge and supported candidates for
Judicial Commissions.
As
judicial campaign spending increases, there is growing concern that judges step aside from hearing cases that
involve campaign supporters or issues where the judge made a
campaign pledge to rule a certain way once elected to the bench.
A judge,
judicial candidate, and a judge - elect must not become
involved in, or publicly associated with, a family member's political activity or
campaign for public office.
Judge Yu described the posting as to «coordinate» (配合) with this
campaign, but is the author's way of saying that the law on these issues is confusing and all
involved, whether they are judges, prosecutors, public security or defense lawyers need an authoritative steer through the forest of law,
judicial interpretations, and other guidance.