Their attorneys litigate claims
involving trademark infringement, unfair competition, dilution and misappropriation of trade secrets in federal and state courts.
A recent case before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Katiroll Company, Inc. v. Kati Roll and Platters, Inc. et al.,
involved a trademark infringement action between two restaurants.
Not exact matches
25.6.3 in any matter that
involves any of the foregoing claims, for resolution or decision of any question of fact or law required to resolve such claim, including, but not limited to, questions required to decide or rule with respect to the
infringement, misappropriation, validity, enforceability or ownership of any copyright, patent, trade secret,
trademark, service mark or trade dress or with respect to any remedy or relief at law or in equity for any such
infringement or misappropriation or for any violation of such Sections 1201 and / or 1202.
Litigating in federal and state courts
involving issues of
trademark grants,
infringement and dilution, unfair trade practices, licensing and assignment
Mr. Kohler's legal experience is comprised of both transactional and litigation services, and includes cases
involving trademark prosecution and
infringement, software licensing agreements, contract drafting and enforcement, copyright
infringement and fair use, website liability, business entity formation, private securities offerings, partnership disputes and more.
The USITC makes determinations in investigations
involving unfair practices in import trade, mainly
involving allegations of
infringement of U.S. patents and
trademarks by imported goods.
Natasha assists clients in developing strategic plans for enforcing their global brands, from managing
trademark portfolios for domestic and international clients to litigation
involving among other areas,
trademark and copyright
infringement, anti-counterfeiting, and false advertising, to negotiating and drafting
trademark licenses.
Mr. Baker has experience in all areas of the litigation process in commercial disputes
involving false advertising claims,
trademark and trade dress
infringement claims, copyright
infringement claims, data privacy claims, patent
infringement claims, art ownership and acquisition claims, trade secrets, right of publicity / privacy claims, consumer protection statute claims, and breach of contract claims.
Represented US clothing retailer against claims of
trademark and trade dress
infringement involving logo used on apparel.
Additionally, Smith is
involved with the prosecution of patent and
trademark applications, and the preparation of invalidity and
infringement opinions.
Living Essentials v. N2G, (E.D. Mich. 2008 - 2011): Represented Plaintiff Living Essentials in
trademark and trade dress
infringement lawsuit
involving 5 hour ENERGY «shot» drink.
Our team handles all types of intellectual property disputes, including cases
involving patent and
trademark infringement, as well as lawsuits
involving the misappropriation of trade secrets.
She has successfully represented clients in matters
involving patent,
trademark, and copyright
infringement; false advertising and unfair competition; health care, commercial, and real estate disputes; and state and federal constitutional law.
Online
trademark infringement, including cases
involving domain names, cybersquatting and unfair use of
trademarks in pay - per - click advertising
Liner's litigation practice focuses on entertainment and media disputes
involving defamation, right of publicity, privacy invasion, copyright and
trademark infringement, and cases relating to brand protection, crisis management and unfair business practices.
He is particularly experienced in intellectual property disputes
involving copyright
infringement,
trademark infringement, unfair competition and trade secret litigation, patent
infringement and domain name disputes.
Represented Mag Instrument in a patent and
trademark infringement action
involving flashlights.
The kinds of representation we provide
involve: (1) litigation and appeals regarding a wide variety of legal issues; (2) employment disputes, including discrimination claims and accusations of noncompliance with wage and hour laws; (3) intellectual property matters regarding patents,
trademarks and copyright
infringements; (4) commercial real estate matters; (5) business law disputes; and (6) alternative dispute resolution («ADR») matters, including mediation and arbitration cases.
Fernando handles a broad spectrum of national and international disputes including those
involving business torts, data breaches, misappropriation of trade secrets, copyright /
trademark infringement, and breach of contract and non-compete covenants.
INNOVATION VENTURES, LLC d / b / a LIVING ESSENTIALS, v. N.V.E., INC. — Jury Trial (E.D. Michigan 2016): Trial counsel for plaintiff in
trademark infringement action
involving plaintiff's 5 hour ENERGY shot.
Crain's Detroit Business Southfield, Mich. — Crain's Detroit Business has issued their «Top Verdicts, Settlements of 2011» and the
trademark infringement lawsuit, Innovation Ventures LLC v. N2G Distributing Inc.
involving the popular 5 - Hour Energy ® drink, made the list of big cases.
Among other things, he has defended corporations and executives in federal, state, arbitral and regulatory claims
involving franchise disputes, unfair competition, breach of contract, tortious interference, fraud, bad faith, professional malpractice,
trademark infringement, business divorce, commercial real estate and leasing disputes, non-compete covenants, RICO laws and Qui Tam statutes.
Additionally, Chris is
involved with the prosecution of patent and
trademark applications, and the preparation of invalidity and
infringement opinions.
Bob is a trial attorney with extensive experience in cases
involving trade secrets, covenants not to compete,
trademark infringement, software licenses, copyright
infringement and patent
infringement, as well as other commercial litigation matters.
That means that the cases
involve questions of
infringement on prints and patterns, not
trademarked logos such as Gucci's interlocking Gs.
Mr. Martinez has also recently handled tort matters in California and in Nevada
involving the misappropriation and misuse of trade secrets, computer espionage,
trademark infringement, and cybersquatting, among a variety of other business disputes.
This
involved preventing
infringement acts of
trademark and patent at Canton Fair and other big exhibitions as well as reaching settlement agreements with more than 20 infringers and also administrative and judicial actions for rights protection against infringers who continued
infringement.
He has prosecuted and defended cases
involving claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty,
trademark infringement, copyright
infringement, unfair competition, securities and common law fraud, and other business related torts.
in multiple
infringement actions, as well as for oppositions and invalidation actions
involving its
trademarks in China.
Complaints and cases of the two
involve false designation of origin,
infringement of intellectual property, unjust enrichment, unfair competition, and
trademark infringement.
Represented national franchisor in disputes with franchisees in multiple jurisdictions
involving breach of contract claims and
trademark infringement claims.
Defense of Samsung Electronics in defense of
trademark infringement claims asserted by Research In Motion («RIM»)
involving Samsung's «BlackJack» and «Black Carbon» and RIM's «BlackBerry».
Other representations include the successful defense of Disney and ABC in an
infringement suit filed by the owner of comic strip characters, the representation of ESPN in a
trademark and copyright
infringement suit
involving a reality television program, the representation of Fox in a
trademark infringement suit over the name of one of its television networks, and the representation of The Gator Corporation in multidistrict
trademark litigation
involving pop - up Internet advertising.
Slotkin Law a full - service firm representing both businesses and individuals in litigation
involving business disputes, franchising, real estate,
trademark infringement, and probate, among other fields.
She has been
involved in numerous landmark German and European
trademark cases, including obtaining the first higher court decision world - wide on the liability of e-commerce platform providers for
trademark infringement.
As a litigator she handles cases
involving trademark and copyright
infringement, domain names, trade secret misappropriation, right of publicity, defamation, and commercial disputes.
Lex Machina's
trademark data lets you analyze federal cases with one or more claims
involving Lanham Act violations, including claims of
trademark infringement,
trademark dilution, unfair competition, or cybersquatting, including declaratory judgment actions.
Litigating disputes
involving patents,
trademark and trade dress
infringement, false advertising, counterfeiting, cybersquatting and unfair competition
She has represented clients in a variety of cases in federal court
involving issues of patent and
trademark infringement, copyright
infringement, false advertising, unfair competition, and trade secrets.
KG v. CAE Machinery Ltd. (1995), 62 C.P.R. (3d) 26 (F.C.T.D.) that «I am also of the opinion that, in general, summary judgment is not the proper means to obtain judgment where the issues before the court
involve the
infringement or the invalidity of a patent», most contested intellectual property decisions in the Federal Court on summary trials and judgment on the merits have related to
trademarks or copyright, or arise where the responding party is not participating.
We represent a wide variety of clients including a world - class semiconductor foundry company, several multinational corporations and many major national and international players in hi - tech and information industry
involved in patent, copyright,
trademark and trade secrete license or
infringement, telecommunication, depositary receipt or convertible bond issuance, joint venture, merger and acquisition, trade practices, syndicated loan arrangement and environment protection.
Defense of a well - known commercial real estate developer in a
trademark infringement action
involving its principal mark.