In earlier
IPCC reports, part two made regional predictions, to tell communities what will happen around them.
What
IPCC don't tell you is that this is true for the entire climate system — yet they continue to present forecasts (scenarios) full of certainty.
But if the trend continues
as IPCC projects, and as nearly all reasonable scientists, including myself, expect, then the changes * will * get their attention.
It is just not clear to me that, at this point, working
on IPCC chapters is the most effective use of my time.
With these findings in mind, combined
with IPCC projections for precipitation frequency, the team now plans to further investigate and evaluate how susceptible the northern hemisphere will be to future droughts.
The high - end
IPCC estimate, remember, is two degrees warmer still.
But, most
IPCC scientists are never even asked for their views on those claims.
Combine this with their assumption that CO2 causes temperature increase, when all records show the opposite, it is not surprising
IPCC predictions of temperature increase are consistently wrong.
The inclusive process by
which IPCC assessments are developed and accepted by its members ensures exceptional scientific credibility.
The core
IPCC conclusions about projected change in the physical climate system are prevailing.
Readers are referred to the relevant
IPCC chapters for a comprehensive discussion.
One green website ran with that idea in the title of a post:
Latest IPCC report calls for world social revolution, says author.
Being familiar with
IPCC reviews, the next step is to look at the references given for that last reservation.
Two important advances since the
last IPCC assessment have increased confidence in the use of models for both attribution and projection of climate changes.
So despite what you might have read at some less - than - reputable publications, the recent leaked
IPCC drafts don't change any game.
This is the decade of the modern era that the
newest IPCC report asserts when human CO2 - induced climate change began.
For the
first IPCC reports, the reviewer comments and the chapter author responses were confidential, and never revealed to the public.
So in all its projections
IPCC assumes climate sensitivity is still > 3 °C.
Many
IPCC reviewers seem to have felt frustrated that the chapter authors were unfairly dismissing or ignoring their long and detailed review comments.
IPCC seems to think we have just 7 more years to reverse things.