According to Ingall, removal of iron by diatom - dominated phytoplankton communities may dampen the intended outcome of enhanced carbon uptake through
iron fertilization by reducing the productivity of other phytoplankton, which take up carbon dioxide more efficiently.
Not exact matches
Possible mechanisms include (iv)
fertilization of phytoplankton growth in the Southern Ocean
by increased deposition of
iron - containing dust from the atmosphere after being carried
by winds from colder, drier continental areas, and a subsequent redistribution of limiting nutrients; (v) an increase in the whole ocean nutrient content (e.g., through input of material exposed on shelves or nitrogen fixation); and (vi) an increase in the ratio between carbon and other nutrients assimilated in organic material, resulting in a higher carbon export per unit of limiting nutrient exported.
Examples of papers confirming that
fertilization of the oceans
by iron could have played a role in ice ages: Moore et al. (2000); Kohfeld et al. (2005); Abelmann et al. (2006); Martínez - Garcia et al. (2011).
This paper considers the practicalities, opportunities and threats associated with one of the earliest proposed carbon - removal techniques: large - scale ocean
fertilization, achieved
by adding
iron or other nutrients to surface waters.
From recent article «
Iron fertilization enhanced net community production but not downward particle flux during the Southern Ocean iron fertilization experiment LOHAFEX», by P. Martin, M. Rutgers van der Loeff, N. Cassar, P. Vandromme, F. d'Ovidio, L. Stemmann, R. Rengarajan,... Continue readi
Iron fertilization enhanced net community production but not downward particle flux during the Southern Ocean
iron fertilization experiment LOHAFEX», by P. Martin, M. Rutgers van der Loeff, N. Cassar, P. Vandromme, F. d'Ovidio, L. Stemmann, R. Rengarajan,... Continue readi
iron fertilization experiment LOHAFEX»,
by P. Martin, M. Rutgers van der Loeff, N. Cassar, P. Vandromme, F. d'Ovidio, L. Stemmann, R. Rengarajan,... Continue reading →
This result sheds new light on the effect of long - term
fertilization by iron and macronutrients on carbon sequestration, suggesting that changes in
iron supply from belowâ as invoked in some palaeoclimatic and future climate change scenarios11â may have a more significant effect on atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations than previously thought.
EFFECT OF NATURAL
IRON FERTILIZATION ON CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN Nature, Vol 446 26 April 2007 doi: 10.1038 / nature05700 The efficiency of fertilization, defined as the ratio of the carbon export to the amount of iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experime
IRON FERTILIZATION ON CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE SOUTHERN OCEAN Nature, Vol 446 26 April 2007 doi: 10.1038 / nature05700 The efficiency of
fertilization, defined as the ratio of the carbon export to the amount of
iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced by iron - addition experime
iron supplied, was at least ten times higher than previous estimates from short - term blooms induced
by iron - addition experime
iron - addition experiments.
WWF condemns
iron fertilization scheme to fight global warming WWF condemns
iron fertilization scheme to fight global warming mongabay.com June 28, 2007 Environmental group WWF condemned a scheme
by Planktos,...
By the late 1990s, a number of entrepreneurs had made the inevitable connection between «
iron fertilization» and the new profit - driven trading markets.
GreenSea Venture, the company started
by Markels, remains very focused on
iron fertilization as a sequestration strategy.
This study closely follows a September Ocean
Iron Fertilization symposium at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) attended
by leading scientists, international lawyers, policy makers, and concerned representatives from government, business, academia and environmental organizations.
A main indirect effect is the
fertilization of ocean phytoplankton production
by dust - mitigated input of
iron to the ocean surface layer (6, 7).
Here we took a different approach
by seeking and applying dust deposition observations from hotspots for dust radiative and
iron fertilization forcing: NH subtropical latitudes and the Southern Ocean.
This allows us to scale the two records
by their respective interglacial levels, combine them to better resolve the Southern Ocean, and use the combined record as our proxy for glacial / interglacial
iron fertilization forcing.
Far riskier is intentional acceleration of carbon dioxide removal
by enhancing the biological uptake in the ocean through
iron fertilization.
Therefore it's my opinion that the not - so - extreme decline from April to July 2010, coupled with the higher - than - usual April value, coupled with the changes (both trend and fluctuation) in both the size of and the timing of the annual cycle, are such that there's insufficient evidence to conclude that the Eyjafjallajökull eruption caused a noticeable change in atmospheric CO2, whether
by emissions from the eruption, the lack of emissions from air traffic, or
iron fertilization of the oceans.
In addition to altering marine food webs,
iron fertilization could produce greenhouse gases more potent than carbon dioxide, such as nitrous oxide and methane, or block sunlight needed
by deep coral reefs.