The article summarizes, or I should say celebrates, the Vergara v. California trial, the case in which nine public school students (emphasis added as these were not necessarily these students» ideas) challenged California's «
ironclad tenure system,» arguing that their rights to a good education had been violated by state - level job protections making it «too difficult» to fire bad teachers.
As per a recent article in the New York Times, «nine public school students [emphasis added as I use students loosely] are challenging California's
ironclad tenure system, arguing that their right to a good education is violated by job protections that make it too difficult to fire bad instructors.
Not exact matches
As a reminder, plaintiffs included nine public school students (backed by some serious corporate reformer funds as per Students Matter) who challenged five California state statutes that supported the state's «
ironclad [teacher]
tenure system.»