Sentences with phrase «irrational decisions based»

People make irrational decisions based on their emotions more than facts.

On the other hand, if you spend most of your time focused on reacting to what the rest of the marketplace is doing, you'll probably make more irrational decisions based in emotion.

I don't think only a «handful» of religious people, for example, make irrational decisions based on faith.

Another bias is mental accounting where an investor divides wealth into arbitrary categories and makes irrational decisions based on the category, such as a stock purchase or sale tied to an emotional attachment to the company.

It would be really easy for people to make irrational decisions based upon FOMO.

Not exact matches

On the other hand, using that as a basis to say authorities should be «protecting» us from bad life decisions and taxing us simply because we have more than our neighbor is irrational and self - destructive.

This is precisely why religious people fail because they are inherently irrational and they use a logical fallacy (appeal to authority) as their basis for moral decisions.

They have produced not one scrap of evidence to justify their removal and have made the decision on the basis of their own irrational prejudices.

I would speak with people on a daily basis who made decisions that seemed completely irrational from an investing standpoint, yet they continued to make them day in and day out.

I would speak with people on a daily basis who made decisions that seemed completely irrational from an investing standpoint, yet they continued -LSB-...]

At first instance, the Reviewing Judge held that the decision to impose catch limits by the Agency were irrational in based on established Public Law principals and that, in the absence of compensation, they unlawfully interfered with Mr Mott's right to peaceful enjoyment of his possessions under Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights («A1P1»).

Such challenges are, in principle, possible and it is quite conceivable that a claim could be brought on the basis that the decision is irrational or unreasonable or indeed ultra vires in light of the right to a fair trial.

Judge Grenfell: The claimant submitted that the policy itself was unlawful, that the decision proceeded on the basis of material errors of fact and that the decision was irrational in its approach to: (i) clinical efficacy; (ii) exceptionality; and (iii) cost effectiveness.

... «core policy» government decisions protected from suit are decisions as to a course or principle of action that are based on public policy considerations, such as economic, social and political factors, provided they are neither irrational nor taken in bad faith.

Challenge on basis that the decision was contrary to a substantive legitimate expectation, irrational, in breach of the consultation requirements and contrary to s 149 Equality Act 2010.

The court clarified that «core policy» government decisions protected from suit are «decisions as to a course or principle of action that are based on public policy considerations, such as economic, social and political factors, provided they are neither irrational nor taken in bad faith.»

The claimants submitted, inter alia, that the orders: (i) had been made without any prior consultation as to the principle, relying upon the common law duty to act fairly and / or the doctrine of procedural legitimate expectation; and (ii) were irrational on the basis that the reasons which had been put forward by the defendants in justification of the decision were inconsistent and contradictoryDyson LJ: The fact that, when conferring on the lord chancellor the power to prescribe court fees, parliament had decided whom he should consult before doing so, militated strongly against the idea that there should co-exist a common law duty to consult more widely (in the absence of a clear promise by the lord chancellor that there would be wider consultation and in the absence of any clear established practice of wider consultation).