It wears you down to continually try and fail to convince
irrational small people to do what you ask all day.
Not exact matches
For example, in the bear market environment of the early 1970s, countless
people were apoplectic over an
irrational fear that ITT (the International Telephone and Telegraph company), which had begun a program of taking over
smaller companies, would take over the world.
I think the harmful «moral absolutism» is in fact coming from
people with
irrational beliefs that mainstream climate science must be wrong because A) it runs counter to their religious beliefs (the «God wouldn't let us screw things up» camp, who like to say how we're too
small and insignificant to actually affect Earth's climate) and / or B) it runs counter to their political beliefs (in that they think environmentalism = liberalism, and that liberalism = the evil commies) and / or C) it runs counter to their fundamentalist belief in the transcendant wisdom of unregulated markets («get government out of industry's way and everything will be allright!
The situation in Rwanda in the»90s, for example, didn't just happen because of some
irrational ethnic or political agenda, it happened at least in part because too many
people had too little land to support themselves, yet everyone depended on
small - scale farming (average farm size on the order of a few acres) for subsistence.
In other words, it would be
irrational to infer that a
person had an intent to traffic on the basis of his or her possession of a very
small quantity of narcotics.