Communication experts say this week's «right to be forgotten» ruling, which obliges Google to delete inadequate and
irrelevant data from search results when a member of the public requests it, will usher in an «unrealistic web».
The point is that this observation is not very relevant if the outcome comes from a combination of relevant and persistently warming data from areas where the temperature is strongly correlated with increase in the heat content of oceans, atmosphere and continental topmost layers, and almost totally
irrelevant data from areas and seasons where and when exceptionally great natural variability of surface temperatures makes these temperatures essentially irrelevant for the determination of longterm trends.
Stop using
irrelevant data from the past to justify some lust you have for hating Forza.
Not exact matches
By the time they can measure «student A»
from the fourth grade through post secondary and beyond, education changes so much through initiatives and new policies that right there the
data is
irrelevant from one year to the next, and of course
from one student to the next!
When you factor in all the test results that fall into categories like these, the
data being gleaned
from them is so skewed it's
irrelevant.
While some education researchers such as Tom Loveless of the Brookings Institution may want to argue that the PISA
data is
irrelevant because it supposedly doesn't reflect what American kids are learning in school, the fact that kids
from highly educated households (as well as kids whose parents are high school dropouts) are not performing well makes such theorizing seem silly.
historical
data is very good... but
irrelevant when the long term trend changes i.e.
from a lower and lower interest rate to a higher and higher interest rate.
In economic modeling, many of the first steps in creating a model are symbolic anyway, so «growth rate,», «change in output», and «economic growth» are used interchangeably to describe changes in GDP because the values either aren't known,
irrelevant until later in the project, or pulled
from data that describes it using one or several of the previously stated terms.
Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking
data and falsely generalizing, bringing up
irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision»
from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutorial - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.
Weather you and I agree or disagree it is totally
irrelevant, it is not a matter of the opinion, it is fact that the
data from Jault Gire and LeMouel (1990) and later reinforced by Bloxham & Jackson (1992) show that 20 % of the Earth's LOD variability is closely correlated to the sunspot magnetic cycle.
Apart
from the pointless and potentially large time cost imposed by this refusal, the task of aggregating PCMDI
data with which we are unfamiliar would create the risk of introducing
irrelevant collation errors or mismatched averaging steps, leading to superfluous controversy should our results not replicate theirs.
This whole series
from National Geographic has
from start to finish been based on a combination of
irrelevant, fake and cherry picked
data.
Today's Climatewire (subscription required) summarizes
data and projections
from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the Paris - based International Energy Agency (IEA)
from which we may conclude that EPA regulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is increasingly
irrelevant to global climate change even if one accepts agency's view of climate science.
We can have many studies that provide weak statistical support for a conclusion — but the number of such studies is
irrelevant unless they are derived
from independent
data sets.
Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking
data and falsely generalizing, bringing up
irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision»
from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutor - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.
This not only protects the information but keeps users
from having to page through
irrelevant billing
data to find invoices for their own matters.
While homeowners are familiar with typical aging - related projects, they view them as
irrelevant, according to
data from the recently released HomeAdvisor 2016 Aging - in - Place Report.