These way students only get loose or
irrelevant data which makes their research irrelevant.
Not exact matches
Meanwhile, Netflix (along with other big streaming players) is very protective of its viewership
data,
which the streaming service claims is made
irrelevant by the fact that Netflix does not rely on ad sales like its traditional TV rivals.
Similarly, many studies that attempt to examine the co-variability between Earth's energy budget and temperature (such as in many of the pieces here at RC concerning the Spencer and Lindzen literature) are only as good as the assumptions made about base state of the atmosphere relative to
which changes are measured, the «forcing» that is supposedly driving the changes (
which are often just things like ENSO, and are
irrelevant to radiative - induced changes that will be important for the future), and are limited by short and discontinuous
data records.
For example, there is no way to manipulate the number of wears to reflect the fact that the clothes have been worn before; I have 3 years of
data that I can not incorporate into the stats,
which makes all of the calculations done by the app
irrelevant.
But for most of the nation's teachers, who do not teach subjects or grades in
which value - added
data are available, that debate is also largely
irrelevant.
Such
data can then be used to make educational analysis and predictions that help to determine
which learning materials are appropriate, useful or
irrelevant for the learners.
I know some of you find numbers
irrelevant (
which, I must say, worries me), so if long posts about information and
data make your eyes cross, then skip to the last few paragraphs of this piece.
You may also have information rectified or erased, or have a statement appended where the
data is incomplete, incorrect or
irrelevant to the purpose for
which it is kept.
And efforts to establish some sort of long term warming trend hidden away due to other factors have required a great many very complex and convoluted statistical calesthenics — all of
which have been rendered
irrelevant thanks to the recent
data «corrections» by Karl et al..
Apart from the pointless and potentially large time cost imposed by this refusal, the task of aggregating PCMDI
data with
which we are unfamiliar would create the risk of introducing
irrelevant collation errors or mismatched averaging steps, leading to superfluous controversy should our results not replicate theirs.
Today's Climatewire (subscription required) summarizes
data and projections from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the Paris - based International Energy Agency (IEA) from
which we may conclude that EPA regulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) is increasingly
irrelevant to global climate change even if one accepts agency's view of climate science.
Last month, the online community (that's pretty much the whole world, folks) was stunned by a ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union («EU COJ»),
which held individuals had a right to request that Google remove
data «that appear to be inadequate,
irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to the purposes for
which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed.»
Communication experts say this week's «right to be forgotten» ruling,
which obliges Google to delete inadequate and
irrelevant data from search results when a member of the public requests it, will usher in an «unrealistic web».
Dozens of types of
data storage medium exist, and most of the
data does not come in neatly labeled files, folders and boxes, but as unstructured
data mixed in with email invites to hockey games, personal documents, relevant documents saved into the wrong folder, proprietary databases
which contain
data that is largely
irrelevant (and sensitive to boot!)
The personal
data was not to be «inadequate,
irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in regard to the purpose for
which it was collected.»
Specifically, if you try to oversell yourself with
irrelevant data that you think makes you look better, you instead appear to be overqualified or confused, neither of
which lands your resume a second look.