Sentences with phrase «irrelevant details up»

Not exact matches

Some have thought that Mark is describing himself here; some consider that it is a detail suggested by Amos 2:16; others simply say it is a genuine, if irrelevant historical detail — genuine, for there seems to be mo reason why the early church would have made it up.

A new study from the Georgia Institute of Technology finds that older people struggle to remember important details because their brains can't resist the irrelevant «stuff» they soak up subconsciously.

Unless they are arguing that actual BAU emissions will be so low as to prevent CO2 from any further significant build up (or at least stay under a doubling), this is a detail entirely irrelevant to climate science, and almost entirely irrelevant to the question about «reasonable anticipation of endangerment».

I mixed up some small irrelevant detail, and next thing I knew he was calling me a liar.

Gray and screenwriters Jonathan Herman and Andrea Berloff at times feel too handcuffed to the group's well - documented history, breaking up the rhythm of the story to check off a minor, well - documented detail of the journey, no matter how emotionally irrelevant it may be.

Other niggles we had with the LCD navigation interface include its tendency to present us with a list before we entered sufficient details, meaning that we had to either back up or spend ages trawling through irrelevant options.

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutorial - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

Their tactics and fallacies include ignoring or distorting mainstream scientific results, cherry - picking data and falsely generalizing, bringing up irrelevant red - herring arguments, demanding unachievable «precision» from mainstream science with the motif «if you don't understand this detail you don't understand anything», overemphasizing and mischaracterizing uncertainties in mainstream science, engaging in polemics and prosecutor - lawyer Swift - Boat - like attacks on science - and lately even scientists, attacking the usual scientific process, misrepresenting legitimate scientific debate as «no consensus», and overemphasizing details of little significance.

Loading up a resume with details, wordiness and irrelevant facts makes these critical elements and qualifications difficult to spot through the myriad of pages which, in turn, lessens your chance of that all - important call - back.

These details take up too much space and are usually irrelevant.

One of the most common error that you can make while writing a resume is filling it up with Irrelevant details.

A qualified resume writer knows the questions to ask in order to dig up all of your accomplishments and, most of the time, will uncover important details you may have dismissed as irrelevant.