DESPITE the departure of most of its staff last year to form the Annals of Improbable Research, The Journal
of Irreproducible Results continues to be published.
«Science is littered
with irreproducible results, even from top places, and it's a widespread problem that looks different in different domains, but there are shared commonalities,» said CMU's Stephen E. Fienberg (pictured right), the Maurice Faulk University Professor of Statistics and Social Sciences.
Michael Mann's new book, The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars, discusses my comment [SMc note — this post is by Hu McCulloch], «
Irreproducible Results in Thompson et al., «Abrupt Tropical Climate Change: Past and Present» (PNAS 2006),» that was published in 2009 in Energy & Environment.
If not, there's always a chance of getting your weirder results published in the (in) famous Journal
of Irreproducible Results.
«Our main conclusion is that even a totally unbiased, perfectly randomized, reliably blinded, and faithfully executed clinical trial may still generate false and
irreproducible results,» he writes in a recent issue of BMC Medical Research Methodology.
Other times they're turbulent, leading to
irreproducible results.
Eli understands they may be looking for work] It is not the Journal of
Irreproducible Results.
The article then procedes to claim that climate science is some sort of good old boys club that is not self - critical and produces incorrect and
irreproducible results.