Sentences with phrase «is a meaningless statement»

That would be a meaningless statement if Judas was in heaven.
That is a meaningless statement.
The problem is that «WC» is a meaningless statement — to some it is only if a geezer would get in to an all - time world X1, to others, making Garth Crooks team of the week is good enough.
It's a meaningless statement for most consumers while audiophiles are all too used to dealing with how to get the best audio possible.
Julius Caesars last breath still has CO2, O2 and Nitrogen around today but it is a meaningless statement.
All we get are meaningless statements of «hottest month», «hottest year», «hottest decade», «climate change is happening», «weather patterns are getting more extreme», etc. backed up with opaque and counter-intuitive pronouncements on attribution.
But this is a meaningless statement by itself.

Not exact matches

Recent presidential statements have been simply ignored, tuned out as meaningless noise by the federal apparatus Trump technically runs
For some companies, interest income on the income statement is small or meaningless.
If «soon» is that different to God, and according to the Bible it is, then the statement is rendered essentially meaningless for purposes of human understanding.
Partisans of the new scientism are fond of recounting the «Sokal hoax» — physicist Alan Sokal submitted a paper heavy on jargon but full of false and meaningless statements to the postmodern cultural studies journal Social Text, which accepted and published it without quibble — but are unlikely to mention a similar experiment conducted on reviewers of the prestigious British Medical Journal.
And then, go home with the thought that because this love is a chemical construct of some sort (as thoughts involve chemistry) that this bond between you and your loved ones is as meaningless and hollow in the whole scheme of things as is the statement of a chemical equation.
He never uses language to convey a merely possible situation, and false statements are meaningless to....
Some basic statement like, «Accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and savior and you will be saved from your sins» is meaningless in any real sense unless the preacher says something about what he means by Jesus Christ.
If they can not provide credible, convincing, verifiable evidence for their statements, they are completely meaningless.
They say that «God is love» which is an absolutely meaningless, nonsensical statement, not to mention the problem with equating love with a being that would let anyone spend even one millisecond in a place like hell.
Ayer would rule out as meaningless such statements as «God is good», «God is responsible for the evils in the world», and «God loves you».
It was quickly pointed out that this would mean that a statement such as «the moon is made of green cheese» is meaningless.
The concept of operation and becoming as self - transcendence gives no warrant for causally linking anything with everything, and negative statements such as «This can not produce that», or, «From this that can not come», are not to be rejected out of hand as meaningless.
This perspective is primarily concerned to eliminate nonsensical statements, or at least to distinguish between nonsense (non-verifiable) and sense (verifiable) Under the pressure of this demand by logical positivists, those who speak and write in the field of religion have not only felt called upon to clear up the fuzzy and meaningless jargon that often characterizes their field, but many have relinquished all terms that refer to the non-verifiable.
Such a statement would have been unnecessary, even meaningless, were John without prominence or praise.
The linguistic and biblicist vetos have been seen to be both arbitrary and unwarranted — which makes it all the more pathetic that Dr Paul van Buren in The Secular Meaning of the Gospel still seems to accept them as valid and to rule out «God - statements» as «meaningless» while at the same time his excessive Barthian christocentrism and bibliocentrism turns the patent intention of scriptural statement into a parody of their proper meaning.
If you didn't have the idea of god, my statement would be meaningless.
But, so far, this has meant that Trump's foreign policy decisions are a string of «spur - of - the - moment» decisions, which render his previous statements meaningless.
However, McNicol said such statements were «meaningless» without action.
And if not, the statement is politically meaningless.
It's helpful, when politicians say such things, to remember Orwell's maxim that if no one could possibly disagree with a statement it is politically meaningless.
He seeks to play to the gallery with the meaningless statement that «the pound is as much Scotland's as the rest of the UK».
«Do you think it's meaningless that you signed a sworn statement that you wouldn't do what you've done?
He further stated that: «The statement was needless, meaningless because the people are already on suspension.
Representative John Diehl, Chair of the House Special Standing Committee on Redistricting, allowed that he was aware of his party's ability to render a veto meaningless but made no explicit statements beyond that.
«There is a debate emerging around the adequacy of Australia's current vehicle - emission standards, but this debate risks being rendered meaningless unless a more relevant testing regime is put in place,» Bradley says in a statement.
Either way, without real numbers the statements are pretty meaningless.
If they included actively managed funds containing bonds, that statement would be true, but would be meaningless.
More worrying is the fact that Zamano was your largest holding so the «Ex-Zamano 5 year performance» statement becomes even more meaningless — had it been a negligible percentage of your portfolio then you could brush it off without much thought.
Such a statement is meaningless, however, unless the question of why those materials became signifiers for an entire generation is considered.
It is interesting to note the Government Art Collection website describes Smith's work as «one of a series of authoritative, yet ultimately meaningless statements».
RC is not a Lion's den but rather a reality check place, you will not get away with blank meaningless statements here.
Not to mentionIf you cared one bit about the veracity of your statements you would know that statistically speaking, the examples you use are meaningless.
Anyhow, until you select a metric (e.g. correlation) to quantify the similarity between observed and predicted, the statement «yes they can» is borderline meaningless.
Reality: This statement is basically meaningless because modern Human civilisation has developed within and is dependent upon a reasonably stable climate.
which is a pretty meaningless statement.
And that's one of those misleadingly meaningless statements.
He says, that due to «the self - defeating claims of some clean - energy enthusiasts» that are often «misleadingly meaningless statements» the public underestimates how difficult moving beyond fossil fuels really is — which he says will take an «energy miracle.»
Meteorologist Art Horn: «To say the 2010 was tied with the warmest year on record is essentially meaningless when viewed in a true historical context»: «The reason they do not give this record its true historical context is because their statement is really political»
The central idea of the article is a vicious feedback loop: Scientists make meaningless or ambiguous statements = > Advocates and media translate statements into alarmist declarations = > Politicians respond to alarm by feeding scientists more money = > [a larger number of scientists and pseudo --RSB- Scientists make meaningless or ambiguous [or false] statements...
Don't just make meaningless statements (a la KR) about how «I'm mixing up exchange and sink rates» — show me where the damn math is wrong.
This is the kind of statement that renders skepticism, about basically any subject, essentially meaningless.
The problem with all of these scary sounding statements is that they are totally meaningless.
My textbook Environmental Science: Earth as a Living Planet has a chapter on the scientific method in which I state that «a measurement without a statement about its degree of uncertainty is meaningless
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z