That would
be a meaningless statement if Judas was in heaven.
That is a meaningless statement.
The problem is that «WC»
is a meaningless statement — to some it is only if a geezer would get in to an all - time world X1, to others, making Garth Crooks team of the week is good enough.
It's a meaningless statement for most consumers while audiophiles are all too used to dealing with how to get the best audio possible.
Julius Caesars last breath still has CO2, O2 and Nitrogen around today but
it is a meaningless statement.
All we get
are meaningless statements of «hottest month», «hottest year», «hottest decade», «climate change is happening», «weather patterns are getting more extreme», etc. backed up with opaque and counter-intuitive pronouncements on attribution.
But
this is a meaningless statement by itself.
Not exact matches
Recent presidential
statements have
been simply ignored, tuned out as
meaningless noise by the federal apparatus Trump technically runs
For some companies, interest income on the income
statement is small or
meaningless.
If «soon»
is that different to God, and according to the Bible it
is, then the
statement is rendered essentially
meaningless for purposes of human understanding.
Partisans of the new scientism
are fond of recounting the «Sokal hoax» — physicist Alan Sokal submitted a paper heavy on jargon but full of false and
meaningless statements to the postmodern cultural studies journal Social Text, which accepted and published it without quibble — but
are unlikely to mention a similar experiment conducted on reviewers of the prestigious British Medical Journal.
And then, go home with the thought that because this love
is a chemical construct of some sort (as thoughts involve chemistry) that this bond between you and your loved ones
is as
meaningless and hollow in the whole scheme of things as
is the
statement of a chemical equation.
He never uses language to convey a merely possible situation, and false
statements are meaningless to....
Some basic
statement like, «Accept Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and savior and you will
be saved from your sins»
is meaningless in any real sense unless the preacher says something about what he means by Jesus Christ.
If they can not provide credible, convincing, verifiable evidence for their
statements, they
are completely
meaningless.
They say that «God
is love» which
is an absolutely
meaningless, nonsensical
statement, not to mention the problem with equating love with a
being that would let anyone spend even one millisecond in a place like hell.
Ayer would rule out as
meaningless such
statements as «God
is good», «God
is responsible for the evils in the world», and «God loves you».
It
was quickly pointed out that this would mean that a
statement such as «the moon
is made of green cheese»
is meaningless.
The concept of operation and becoming as self - transcendence gives no warrant for causally linking anything with everything, and negative
statements such as «This can not produce that», or, «From this that can not come»,
are not to
be rejected out of hand as
meaningless.
This perspective
is primarily concerned to eliminate nonsensical
statements, or at least to distinguish between nonsense (non-verifiable) and sense (verifiable) Under the pressure of this demand by logical positivists, those who speak and write in the field of religion have not only felt called upon to clear up the fuzzy and
meaningless jargon that often characterizes their field, but many have relinquished all terms that refer to the non-verifiable.
Such a
statement would have
been unnecessary, even
meaningless,
were John without prominence or praise.
The linguistic and biblicist vetos have
been seen to
be both arbitrary and unwarranted — which makes it all the more pathetic that Dr Paul van Buren in The Secular Meaning of the Gospel still seems to accept them as valid and to rule out «God -
statements» as «
meaningless» while at the same time his excessive Barthian christocentrism and bibliocentrism turns the patent intention of scriptural
statement into a parody of their proper meaning.
If you didn't have the idea of god, my
statement would
be meaningless.
But, so far, this has meant that Trump's foreign policy decisions
are a string of «spur - of - the - moment» decisions, which render his previous
statements meaningless.
However, McNicol said such
statements were «
meaningless» without action.
And if not, the
statement is politically
meaningless.
It
's helpful, when politicians say such things, to remember Orwell
's maxim that if no one could possibly disagree with a
statement it
is politically
meaningless.
He seeks to play to the gallery with the
meaningless statement that «the pound
is as much Scotland's as the rest of the UK».
«Do you think it
's meaningless that you signed a sworn
statement that you wouldn't do what you've done?
He further stated that: «The
statement was needless,
meaningless because the people
are already on suspension.
Representative John Diehl, Chair of the House Special Standing Committee on Redistricting, allowed that he
was aware of his party's ability to render a veto
meaningless but made no explicit
statements beyond that.
«There
is a debate emerging around the adequacy of Australia's current vehicle - emission standards, but this debate risks
being rendered
meaningless unless a more relevant testing regime
is put in place,» Bradley says in a
statement.
Either way, without real numbers the
statements are pretty
meaningless.
If they included actively managed funds containing bonds, that
statement would
be true, but would
be meaningless.
More worrying
is the fact that Zamano
was your largest holding so the «Ex-Zamano 5 year performance»
statement becomes even more
meaningless — had it
been a negligible percentage of your portfolio then you could brush it off without much thought.
Such a
statement is meaningless, however, unless the question of why those materials became signifiers for an entire generation
is considered.
It
is interesting to note the Government Art Collection website describes Smith's work as «one of a series of authoritative, yet ultimately
meaningless statements».
RC
is not a Lion's den but rather a reality check place, you will not get away with blank
meaningless statements here.
Not to mentionIf you cared one bit about the veracity of your
statements you would know that statistically speaking, the examples you use
are meaningless.
Anyhow, until you select a metric (e.g. correlation) to quantify the similarity between observed and predicted, the
statement «yes they can»
is borderline
meaningless.
Reality: This
statement is basically
meaningless because modern Human civilisation has developed within and
is dependent upon a reasonably stable climate.
which
is a pretty
meaningless statement.
And that
's one of those misleadingly
meaningless statements.
He says, that due to «the self - defeating claims of some clean - energy enthusiasts» that
are often «misleadingly
meaningless statements» the public underestimates how difficult moving beyond fossil fuels really
is — which he says will take an «energy miracle.»
Meteorologist Art Horn: «To say the 2010
was tied with the warmest year on record
is essentially
meaningless when viewed in a true historical context»: «The reason they do not give this record its true historical context
is because their
statement is really political»
The central idea of the article
is a vicious feedback loop: Scientists make
meaningless or ambiguous
statements = > Advocates and media translate
statements into alarmist declarations = > Politicians respond to alarm by feeding scientists more money = > [a larger number of scientists and pseudo --RSB- Scientists make
meaningless or ambiguous [or false]
statements...
Don't just make
meaningless statements (a la KR) about how «I
'm mixing up exchange and sink rates» — show me where the damn math
is wrong.
This
is the kind of
statement that renders skepticism, about basically any subject, essentially
meaningless.
The problem with all of these scary sounding
statements is that they
are totally
meaningless.
My textbook Environmental Science: Earth as a Living Planet has a chapter on the scientific method in which I state that «a measurement without a
statement about its degree of uncertainty
is meaningless.»