Infinity and Skylanders aren't going anywhere for a while, the competition between the two
is good for gamers, but for people's pockets, it can be tough, especially with the «got ta get them all» mentality.
Competition
is good for us gamers as exhibited by orice drops and awesome bundles.
I think
this is good for gamers, and I therefore needed and should apply to all devs.
Competition
is good for gamers.
This really doesn't make sense as having the Xbox One titles show up on PC
is good for gamers and Microsoft.»
And what else
is good for gamers is seeing the competition give respect to each other for doing something good.
Developers have also said that the PS3 is a bit of a headache to develop for, because of how Sony set up it's hardware, and developers are actually looking forward to PS4 because it's way more developer friendly than PS3, also Nintendo is making Wii U highly developer friendly because of everything they have been doing so far, and any game system that's pushing developer friendliness
is good for all gamers.
You said it will
be good for game developers.
You can get two high seeds playing each other in the first round or the second round and perhaps that's not fair but I think ultimately it's good for the game to have heated playoff series against teams that don't like each other and see each other a lot.»
If palace give us headache today, whether it comes with a draw or a narrow win, it wont
be good for our game against a top side like liverpool.
Sometimes, heckling fans
are good for the game, like Spike Lee heckling Reggie Miller.
But overall I think it has
been good for the game, forces more pucks to stay in play and possibly create turnovers because you have to worry about flying it over the glass.
That's unfortunate for many reasons, one of which is that Beltre is just super fun to watch and every game that he's on the field
is good for the game.
Ozil
is good for some games, bad for others.
Also before we decide Giroud
is best for a game like that, where big players sit back a bit, how about we shoot from distance, at the least it might bring players out of the box more..
He maybe shoulda stayed single, but all that aside, a lot of us wan na see him in the mix or even lapping the field again (unlikely) «cuz it's good for the game.
This is what would
be good for the game, especially in an era of a multitude of options fighting for people's time and attention.
It would
be better for the game and the wider interest in it and based on the kind of champion this venue has produced, it would keep up a historical trend if a future HOFer like Spieth or McIlroy took it this week.
my opinion (you know, the one you so adamantly disagree with) is that it would
be better for the game because the 6 best teams in the conference would go to the playoffs.
Tiger Woods may be demolishing the ball again (per Rickie Fowler) ahead of his much - anticipated return to competitive golf in two weeks at the 18 - player, no - cut Hero World Challenge, and Sergio Garcia believes the Big Cat's comeback will
be good for the game.
This was not in a negative way but just in terms of what the manager thought
was best for that game.
Judge in the World Series
is good for the game!!!
«We've got Aaron Judge, and him playing in the World Series
is good for the game.
If you're looking to rank the winning options for this week that
are Best For The Game Of Golf, Sharma and Li are squarely 2A and 2B right behind Tiger Woods himself.
And he'd probably
be good for a game in both Arrigo Sacchi's AC Milan and Wimbledon's Crazy Gang.
Of course this does not mean
it is good for the game, and I agree with Tony, it should be eradicated from the game.
Putting a brake on that and preventing it happening on the same scale again has to
be better for the game.
I've talked in the past how hard games
are good for gamers, and after the hair - ripping experience that was Hyper Light Drifter, I maintain my position.
It makes the game more fun to just have it at all times, which
is best for the game.
Destiny 2 finally makes it onto PC and things couldn't
be better for the game when compared to the console brethren.
Ancel says the development team will use the extra time to add characters, bosses, «even new levels... which
is good for the game.»
I am disappointed with silk and kindle,
it is good for games but selection six.
I find that the iPad
is better for games and the Tab is better for things I do, like stock charting, which requires Flash about everywhere, and all of Google's services.
I found the arrowkeys easiest to use of them all, but obviously choose what
's best for the game you're about to play.
That's why I think it would
be best for The Game to have its own page of links that the author checks and adjusts from time to time.
and features new Pasapalum turf [we heard that's good for a game of golf!]
During an interview with IndustryGamers, Pachter pointed to the issue of free online play fostering strong replay factor which, while
being good for gamers, is leaving publishers coming up short.
There are lots of regular fans that would love to be able to carry our library forward on Playstation hardware, but unfortunately the mindless zealots will always cheer whatever their favorite corporation happens to be doing at the time, regardless of whether it's good for the gamer or not.
It seems to me that MS is finally investing real money into the gaming industry, which can only
be good for gamers
He continues: «He makes a big deal about not liking games, and I just don't think that attitude
is good for games in general.
We all care very much about Mass Effect and make our decisions based on what
's best for the game.»
More time spent developing and perfecting Dark Void
is good for both gamer and game maker, even if I am disappointed that my jet - pack fitting will have to be rescheduled.
Ultimately, it's good for gamers, it's good for the industry and quite frankly it's probably even good for Sony that Microsoft have recovered well and both platforms are innovating.
I think in the long term it'll
be better for us gamers.
If the thing does indeed turn out to be über - cool then it's better for the gamers to discover such things for themselves.
Not exact matches
Beyond the two
games competing
for players, devotees of each
are debating which
is the
better game, and the number one argument
is related to skill.
And simpler
games that work
well on mobile usually don't require massive budgets and teams of hundreds to produce; smaller development budgets mean they don't need to sell millions of copies to turn a profit, and there
's more room
for creative risk.
Depending on the state in which you reside, your individual retirement account may
be fair
game for plaintiffs, as
well.
«Generally, when you
are the basis
for a platform, you don't want to scare away investment in your platform developers by competing with them... There
is a vibrant ecosystem of
game developers, headed by Zynga, who do a
good job making successful social
games already, and Facebook gets a cut of what those developers make, so there
is currently no need
for Facebook to step in and make
games itself, either strategically or monetarily,» Hoskins recently explained via Quora.