Sentences with phrase «is no logical answer»

There is no logical answer to an emotional argument — and faith is a powerful emotion indeed.

There is no logical answer to an emotional argument — and faith is pure emotion, untainted by the cold, hard facts.

I would be more inclined to accept your statement, Pedro, that «someone eternal» is the logical answer, if you would use some logic to explain why.

There can be no logical answer to an emotional argument, and faith is indeed a powerful emotion.

There may well be a logical answer to that which I am unaware of, but it's a bit like saying let's celebrate the life and influence of Queen Victoria in 1950 (she died in 1901).

No is the logical answer which means you want the state senate in the hands of Republicans.

If you are concerned about every penny these days yet still would like to have a social life, dating online at no cost to you is the logical answer.

There is no logical answer to this question; it is an artifact of an outdated retirement system designed long ago for a different kind of work force.

For Audi, at least, there's a logical answer: an eye - popping 155,000 Q5s sold globally last year to go along with 47,700 Q7s.

The stir - up in Barnes & Noble's tablet lineup is a logical answer to Amazon's recent price cuts and launch of Kindle Fire.

Exporters were the logical answer... boy, do you realize how hard it is to find any decent Greek companies who have domestic costs, mostly export revenues, a real cost advantage & a desired product internationally..?!

I know there is a logical answer here since obviously SFR rentals occur everyday, I just want to understand.

Not exact matches

You do this by thinking through all the objections that a qualified prospect might make, then develop logical, complete answers to each of these objections so you're prepared if and when they come up.

For some reason, that simple, logical answer is still escaping Cineplex.

The most logical answer is that Jobs's method consistently produced results without causing people to hold grudges against him.

If at this point, you really need questions answered or some input, a meeting might be logical.

So it seems like the logical answer to all of these data points would be to be to ramp up your social media presence across as many platforms as possible, right?

If you are a seeker of link building services, and are evaluating companies or persons to help with your link building strategies and tactics, it's logical and reasonable to have some questions you want answers for.

The answer to the puzzle of why people don't do what is logical and beneficial for the individual and the team, lies deeper than you might think.

That's why I follow logical formats and answer every serious post.

hawaiiguest Perhaps you fear ridicule when your answer betrays what you felt has been a logical and reasoned approach to discredit the authority of the Bible.

There is obvious signs on design and we all know design needs a designer, there is no other logical answer.

For me I see evolution the same as you see God not enough proof to say I believe it and see God as how all things started, in my view evolution of man can be true just that it has not been proven where God I can see because there is no other logical explanation for how the matter in the universe came to be from nothing, a higher power for now can be the only possible answer if science was to prove the creation of the universe in some other way I would not deny that truth.

Some of these questions, I've asked pastors, elders, over and over again, and no one seems to be able to give me an answer that's COMPLETELY sound and all the way logical.

THAT is the only logical answer.

I know this answer does not satisfy you nor seem logical but it is what I think is the basic truth of Christianity.

That's far too logical for the Christian mind, although no doubt they'll have some senseless answer.

It's not surprising that you would support him / her since NEITHER of you can come up with ANY LOGICAL ANSWERS to the questions.

Again, I don't aim to lock anybody into a logical box where the answer must only be, «the Christian God is real» because, in truth, there is simply no way to do that.

Man - made hypothesis of where we came from, such as from evolution (saying that proteins formed in a «prebiotic soup» and then «joining hands» with DNA, so that eventually a living cell is born), is not satisfying nor does it provide logical answers as to how the quality of love came about nor a conscience, that literally means «co-knowledge» in Greek.

It isn't any more logical to say, with Aristotle, that the universe has simply always existed than it is to say that there's a Creator, Bertrand Russell's reply to the Jesuit philosopher Frederick Copleston — that there's no answer to this question — doesn't seem terribly satisfactory either.

Science will never be able to answer all the silly qustions mankind has (such as what happens to us after we die), but in no way does that mean the logical default answer is a so called «god».

The answer to this question can not be found, as is so often claimed, in the inadequacies of the preacher so far as his rhetorical skill, his use of apt illustrations, his logical development of theme, and so forth are in view.

Logic points to a Creator outside of time and space and there is no other logical answer.

Perhaps you would be right in saying there is no other logical answer that we are aware of based on our very limited understand of the universe.

Only eggheads like you feel the need to always have answers to questions that are logical, try a little faith dude, you'll feel better.

I am not trying to convince you that I am right, either... I am just telling you that I don't know all the answers, but I do know that your answers are inconceivable in every logical and reasonable sense to me.

I answer simply, if without apparent modesty, there is exactitude, logical rigor.»

It will be very «interesting», as u put it, to see your logical (not magical) answers to above questions.

Although such a doctrine of an immortal soul is usually appealed to in order to answer questions about the meaning of death, it is logical to assert that the soul, whose existence is independent of the body, may therefore originate independently from the body.

If the question is about the logical content of the word, the answer is clear.

Perhaps I did not come across as being sincere in my question, but I was indeed looking for an answer and not looking to «trap» someone in a logical fallacy.

But mere familiarity is not enough, for it does not answer the fundamental question: if the causal relation is identified with the relation of logical implication in which the premises imply the conclusion, is it possible to obtain any temporal sequence at all without surreptitiously borrowing it from experience?

What is with the Christian backers of their god as soon as they are backed into a corner and they do not have a logical answer they come back well after the fact and start the same BS arguments all over again.

Having the right answer is no proof that you are logical.

The persuasive way to read Pascal's original is as a performance argument and a prayer, but, taken as a flat set of logical possibilities, it has an answer in the extremely unlikely possibility that God rewards disbelief or that God punishes belief.

Being wrong in giving answers to natural phenomena isn't a logical error.

which means the most logical answer is that all three of them are FAR from The Truth.

The only logical answer to the question as to who could have mentioned all these scientific facts 1400 years ago before they were discovered, is exactly the same answer initially given by the atheist or any person, to the question who will be the first person who will be able to tell the mechanism of the unknown object.

Now, could it possibly be that the reason the answer is out of reach is because the bible was written by numerous, imperfect human beings, under the influence of their own religious biases, and all those writings have been complied, hundreds of years later, by men of equal imperfectness and religious biases, so as to render any logical discussion about what the hell was their intention in writing what the wrote, completely implausible?