Sentences with phrase «is no logical contradiction»

So it's a logical contradiction.»

It is a logical contradiction for God to love all men, including his enemies, and yet also hate Esau, but this does not seem to bother Paul at all.

Fact is that «gay marriage» is a a contradiction in terms... really... Gay and Marriage is a logical contradiction.

Here is a logical contradiction in Paul's thought, and in early Christian thought generally, which we can only accept.

There is no logical contradiction in the theory of liberalism.

And you can't because it's a logical contradiction - you don't even have to do any grubby work with the data and the documents to prove it, it's just proven by the meaning of the words themselves.

It is a logical contradiction for how can there be a Little Ice Age if it wasn't cooler in the past?

Obviously, there is a logical contradiction here, if both conclusions, «global warming» and «pause» over the recent 20 years were equally valid, based on the same logic of reasoning and using the same data, only switching the Null - hypothesis with the alternative hypothesis, since the two conclusions are mutually exclusive.

However, there is a logical contradiction to this theory / rumor.

Not exact matches

I can show that the bible has hundreds of contradiction, inconsistencies, logical fallacies and very little of it is based in any sort of reality.

Rather than explicitly invoking consciousness to effect the reconciliation of opposites as he does in the Phenomenology, Hegel here interprets Aufhebung (sublation) as a purely logical movement, in which the «contradiction,» or opposed or «dirempted» elements, are as «matter» to the «form» of the resolution on a higher level.

He and I did not see eye to eye on certain issues of soteriology, and it was not long before he expressed some some serious logical contradictions.

What looks like a logical contradiction is resolved in life, for not only the Bible but our own experience tells us that to forgive others as fully as we can is both a condition and a consequence of divine forgiveness.

It is not a logical contradiction to assert that choice X is contingent in origination but not contingent in regard to the fact of its occurrence.

Propositions which describe them are nevertheless logical contingencies, propositions which can be denied without contradiction.

It's often said that three claims of the Christian tradition — «God is omnipotent,» «God is love» and «Evil exists» — present a logical contradiction.

You profess that god is this all loving being, yet ignore the contradictions constantly, you also cherry pick what I post with what you think you can rationalize away easily with your asinine logical fallacies.

It will then be seen that actual occasions must be repeatable if these three doctrines are each to be prevented from issuing in either a conceptual incoherence or an outright logical contradiction.

Even if their claim does not entail a logical contradiction, it is at least a clear indication that contraception has, for them, no troublesome ontological implications.

Hartshorne connects his opposition to the classical doctrine of omnipotence with his rejection of the classical doctrine of creation.19 To be sure, one might embrace creation ex nihilo while recognizing some limits to divine power (other than logical contradiction).

On the argument between religion and science, McGrath considers that there is no contradiction since science itself works on acts of faith, not simply on logical deduction.

There is not only a kind of logical scandal in asserting both p and not - p, where p is any proposition, but also a conviction that such a contradiction is an impossibility in the domain of existent things.

You mean so she can continue to be confused by all the contradictions and logical fallacies of this supposedly «divinely inspired» book written by people with no concept of simple things like the chlorophyll in plants that make them green?

We shall take our definition of logical possibility from Hartshorne himself: «A described state of affairs is «logically possible» if the description «makes sense» and involves no contradictions» (6: 593) What Hartshorne means by «makes sense» is never clearly spelled out in his arguments.

The lessons of transcendental philosophy were not in vain: his logical ability is brilliant, although one could blame Solovyev for a certain inconsistency, inner contradictions in his system.

He is omnipotent for everything that does not involve logical contradiction.

An oxymoron is a descriptive phrase containing a logical contradiction: a deafening silence, a cold fire, or, my daughter's favorite, military intelligence.

But these activities, if dialectical, are not so in the sense of «struggling to circumvent the formal - logical law of contradiction.»

Your logical contradiction is based on your judgement as to how an omniscient being would behave.

Still, I should think that before endorsing the idea that the logical limit of power is restricted to power sufficient to bring about only what is metaphysically possible, we should want to be shown that such contradiction can, in fact, be derived.

This is to say that from the ascription of more power than is possessed by X, one can derive a logical contradiction.

I have argued elsewhere that for all anyone has been able to show to the contrary, this theodicy is free of logical contradiction.11 But, of course, if it is not contradictory, then Mackie's challenge to traditional Christian theism fails.

Kant tries to argue that our inability to will the universality of a maxim is formal, that is, dependent upon some logical self - contradiction.

Even so, we might be able to prove that «T» has no contradiction as a logical consequence without invoking an actual case.

This difference between the logical contradictions «some» and «all» is at the heart of understanding theism as Hartshorne often states; not the contraries, «all» and «none.»

Leaving the body is not so much a logical contradiction as a particularly ungainly and undignified thing to do, in the same way that sex is ungainly and undignified and that being born is ungainly and undignified.

Social theories have failed in the respect that social contradictions are either too simply interconnected according to logical or structural analyses or left unconnected to fall into fragmentation or reductionism.

Karl Barth understood this well when he wrote: «Strange as it may seem, it is still true, that those who fail to understand other churches than their own are not the people who care intensely about theology, but the theological dilettantes, eclectics, and historians of all sorts; while those very men who have found themselves forced to confront a clear, thoroughgoing, logical sic et non find themselves allied to each other in spite of all contradictions, by an underlying fellowship and understanding, even in the cause which they handle so differently and approach from such painfully different angles.

Beliefs or statements that are claimed to be true or false are subject to principles of logical laws, such as identity, contradiction and excluded middle.

As a result, he was acutely sensitive to flaws and contradictions in the logical structure of physical theories.

He did this by contradiction, logically: He assumes that these infinite sets are the same size, then follows a series of logical steps to find a flaw that undermines that assumption.

This was possible because DNA naturally comes with two complementary strands twisted together, and the researchers set up their problem so that every length representing a logical contradiction contained at least one 30 - base sequence and its complement.

There is one glaring logical contradiction here, too, though, that I want to touch on.

This is not a logical contradiction, but one of mentality.

It's called Odio le favole by Ermal Meta, and follows themes of dramatic love in a temporal paradox; a logical contradiction in the sentence, «The future was very beautiful for us».

Why is there a logical contradiction?

What we want are theories that, without involving us in direct logical contradictions, state that the observations will as a rule cluster in a limited subset of the set of all conceivable observations, while it is still consistent with the theory that an observation falls outside this subset «now and then».

(Further down, Kelly gets delusional altogether with a panoply of various detailed custody ideas and conclusions, not a single one of which is based on any research — or even a logical precursor in this paper itself — in an amazing Orwellian contradiction of the title of this article.)

Sometimes they will ask rhetorical questions that tries to catch their partner in a contradiction, and sometimes they will simply seek to undermine the validity of the other person's emotions by suggesting that there is a rational or logical solution to the complaint the partner is voicing.