Egypt taking back the Gaza Strip has
been out of the question since 1979.
The thought of going to an aerobics class or a gym
is out of the question since I am exhausted all the time mentally, physically.
First of all: getting new parts
is out of the question since I have no access to those.
Ikea was a few states away and getting nice items online
was out of the question since they usually cost so much more with shipping so we were stuck with what's available near our town.
Not exact matches
And
since the prospect
of paying off the maxed -
out card
is so remote, it
's just a
question of time before you will max -
out a second card, and then a third, and so on.
One school
of thought says she should just plow ahead with her environmental agenda; history will
be on her side in the end,
since no one today (outside
of maybe a few U.S. Republicans) doubts that the
question of phasing
out fossil fuels
is not a matter
of if but when.
Since this
is a percentage
question, SAT prep site Get800 recommends substituting numbers in for b and k and playing
out all
of the answers to see which one makes sense.
Since many Americans go
out with people they don't know very well, it
's common to ask plenty
of questions — about one
's background, education, ambitions, etc. — to get to know each other.
For Walmart, adding its products to Amazon Alexa's voice - shopping platform
was obviously
out of the
question since the two companies
are fierce rivals and Amazon's voice commerce approach appears to
be more closed off.
Meanwhile, the overall share
out of the labor force because they
're discouraged, have family responsibilities, transportation problems, illness, or a disability has stayed flat at around 1 %
since the BLS started asking this
question in the current form in 1994, they add.
 The Harper government
's decision last year to write off every penny
of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year
's deficit calculation (which I
questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already
been proven wrong.Â
Since the money
was already «written off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would
be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it
was an «investment,» not a bail -
out), any repayment will come as a gain that can
be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it
's always politically better to make the budget situation look worse than it
is (even when the bottom has fallen
out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth
of the public equity share).
I
'm not sure what I said to lead you to believe that I
am «throwing
out the most proven and fundamental laws
of science»
since I
'm pretty sure that none
of the laws that you mention describe a need for the past to
be gone and the future to not exist yet, and I
was only forwarding a theoretical possibility with apparently good evidence as far as I can tell to address the
question «Why would matter come into existence all by itself for no good reason?»
I just happened to miss that part
of the information, and thought I'd check it
out, but
since I've
been unemployed
since 2012 it
is out of the
question for me.
And as Big Shiz, pointed
out, yes, you
're a racist if you even
question that Zimmerman might have acted stupidly instead
of as the biggest racist
since Nathan Forrest.
Since the Messiah was expected to re-establish the kingdom of David in keeping with the prophecies (see p. 97), and since Jesus was evidently not interested in worldly kingship or in driving out the Romans, this is a very good ques
Since the Messiah
was expected to re-establish the kingdom
of David in keeping with the prophecies (see p. 97), and
since Jesus was evidently not interested in worldly kingship or in driving out the Romans, this is a very good ques
since Jesus
was evidently not interested in worldly kingship or in driving
out the Romans, this
is a very good
question.
As Moltmann points
out, God - language must
be set in the category
of expectation,
since this
is appropriate for a God
of promise.15 Our problem here, therefore,
is not to establish the ontological foundation for God - talk but to consider the position and claim
of linguistic analysis in relation to the
question of the validity
of God - talk.
Jeremy
since we
are talking about satan casting
out satan heres a
question for you.Have you ever wondered why Jesus helps satan at times or at least it appears that way.Mat 8:28 - 34 Why would he do that in the case
of the demonic man the demons requested that Jesus cast them them into the pigs which he allowed it seems that not only did he help satan to have his way in destroying the pigs but destroyed the livelihood
of the people in that area.You could argue at least it saved one man but
is it acceptable to save one life but affect the lives
of many?
How far complete clarity about oneself, as to whether one
is in despair, may
be united with
being in despair, where this knowledge and self - knowledge might not avail precisely to tear a man
out of his despair, to make him so terrified about himself that he would cease to
be in despair — these
questions we shall not decide here, we shall not even attempt to do so,
since in the sequel we shall find a place for this whole investigation.
It
is out of the
question to try to grasp God through sight (which
is the equivalent
of reducing truth to reality), to claim that what one sees can
be God (in this case one converts reality into truth), or to make a representation
of something in the spiritual realm (which
is the same as consecrating a religion,
since religions always belong to the visual realm).
The
question of Irishness has
been hovering over the Catholic abuse scandals for years, ever
since journalists noticed (but scarcely dared point
out) that they seemed concentrated among the Irish Catholic diaspora
of the United States, Canada and Australia.
As for the
question of why interreligious dialogue should have had its first major public
outing in the United States, and why it has flourished here more than in any other country
since, this
is slightly more complicated.
The openness
of questioning is of course not absolute, as Gadamer points
out,
since every
question already implies the direction in which the answers to that
question must come if it
is to
be meaningful and appropriate.
So
since I feel a little
out of my depth tackling this one by myself, I
'm going to leave my response in a comment and then open Sharon's
question up for discussion.
And
since a denial
of the divinity
of Christ
was out of the
question, the trend
was toward a qualification
of his humanity.
6 There would not seem to
be a problem for modal logic in Whitehead's theory
of propositions
since a proposition as such
is in principle exclusive
of» the
question of existence, although the picked
out content exists insofar as it
is «picked
out.»
Science as it
is usually understood
is simply incapable
of addressing the
question of the possible purpose
of nature
since the material it deals with has already
been abstracted
out of the «qualitative» realm
of value and placed in that
of the merely quantifiable, subject only to mathematical calculation.
Abstracting from cosmological considerations
is quite understandable here
since the immediate
questions giving rise to this adventurous theology arise
out of social and economic inequities.
wow i graduated with this kid frist we did not tell him he had to bow his head, he just made a big deal because everybody else
was praying, and
since he
is atheist he thinks that it
is wrong for everybody else to pray in the military ceremony, he
was going to graduate regardless, and i went to AIT with this kid, i knowwhat happend exactly, he made a big deal
out of nothing and now its on the news, Thats embarassing for the United States Army that we have privates like him... Sincerly PFC Fuentes proud grizzly 2nd Platoon grad, if you have any
questions about the event text me @ (915) 841-4142
I genuinely
was interested in this subject because
of late it has somewhat
been playing on my mind and so sought to discover the truth on the matter and so sought
out discussions and literature by christian writers that I might examine their different stances on the issue and try to find a moral cross-section as I think
is appropriate for all
questions since the ranging views
are like politics ranging from far left wing to far right wing views.
In fact, as I began my journey
out of the institutional church I
was questioning everything from both sides and the responses I got from the blogger you mention
were downright rude and I haven't commented on his blog
since (unless I totally agreed with him and could» t resist).
If they
were, they would do it secretly
since the teaching
is based on guilt and shame, then again educating how good sex can promote a healthy marriage
is out of the
question... vicious cycle it
is...
I opted to leave tomatoes
out of this recipe
since the 7 - year - old in
question isn't a fan, but you could definitely add drained Rotel or petite diced tomatoes if it suits your fancy!
Since syrup — which
is an essential ingredient in conventional meringue frosting —
was out of question, I had to think
of something else.
I make a lot
of foods that
are based off
of these products (especially
since I don't eat meat so making my own broth
is out of the
question) and I
am really frustrated with all the ingredients in even the gluten free versions.
Changes to the layout
are out of the
question too,
since the circuit owners have said it wouldn't do anything that interferes with the MotoGP event.
A treble in his first season at Barcelona and another Champions League in just his first three seasons in management
was a remarkable achievement, no
question, and if anything his struggles at Bayern show that one can not simply inherit a good set
of players and let them do the rest, but while he revolutionised the game in 2009, he
is now
being found
out and it
is something
of a surprise that he has no other European Cup to his name
since 2011 given the quality
of teams he
's had at his disposal
since then.
as for cowardly ozil who always get a flu before big matches, shameful, the only reason a player should
be left off defensive work
is the player must
be atleast 80 % efficient on the attack, such a player must have the ability to dribble or take on defenders on his own, shot thunderly and scare the hell
out of defenders with his movements... such a player
is hazard, sorry we couldn't get him cos our dumb coach felt he
was too expensive and arsenal didn't even pose tittle abilities like Chelsea, hazard didn't even consider arsenal...
since van persie left sanchez had
been the only player to
question wenger's credentials and now wenger must
be regretting ever signing him now... the words
of manuel neuer «player arsenal
was like an holiday»... shame on wenger...
I
'm not implying by any stretch
of the imagination that this scenario would have worked
out well for the players in
question, but it would
be the best thing for the team, especially
since Jay clearly doesn't have the confidence to put Reynolds in there yet.
This
is an incredibly difficult
question to answer for a variety
of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style
of play has become a shadow
of it
's former self, only to
be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play
out of position and adjustments / substitutions
are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid
of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly
out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs
out wide, we've seen pace from the likes
of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play
of Monreal, but none
of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud
was playing and his ratio
of scored goals per clear chances
was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin
's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which
was obvious to Wenger because there
was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that
being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka
is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part
of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he
is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let
's face it Wenger
was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this
was all part
of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature
of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player
of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he
's been played
out of position far too many times
since arriving and that the players in front
of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team
's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player
was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who
are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that,
of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one
of those 3 players to stay on it would
be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one
of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already
of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs
of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that
is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there
is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he
's lack
of mobility
is an albatross around the necks
of our offence... so when you ask who would
be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because
of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other
was just sold to Juve... man, this
is theraputic because following this team
is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
There
is no real answer to the
question you have posed because this club has once again hedged their bets on doing the bare minimum then hoping for the best... if they
were serious about changing the stagnant culture that has permeated the club
since our move from the Highbury, we would have immediately released and / or moved several players in the early days
of the window... this would have demonstrated to the fans that they
were serious about addressing our obvious inadequacies... likewise this would have forced them to bring in replacements because they couldn't have used the lame excuse Wenger
is presently spewing about having too many players... we functionally have the same amount
of players as we did when the window first opened but he didn't say jack about it then... he simply waited until the inevitable happened then pulled
out his excuse Rolodex, closed his eyes and randomly drew the «too many players» card... the more he opens his mouth, the more I understand his «god» complex when it relates to all things Arsenal... what other manager could continually do the same dumb shit, not address obvious concerns for years, speak to the fans in such a condescending manner, face enormous criticism from many
of his former star players and
be the architect
of so many failed player signings yet
be one
of the highest paid managers with the longest tenure in Europe... maybe Kroenke
is colourblind and instead
of seeing all the red flags he can only see the GREEN ones ($ $ $)
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands,
is in no better position to compete next season than they
were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have
been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more
questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he
's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father
were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there
are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan
out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough
was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings
are indicative
of what
's wrong with this club and it
's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in
question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to
be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger
's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to
be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he
was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil
were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract
is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it
's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value
is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would
be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who
is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will
be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam
being perpetrated by this club
since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry
's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP,
was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to
be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model
was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he
was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who
were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and
were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who
were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it
was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really
was...
*
Since all other managers
are out of the
question i believe this former WC Barca man has
been quite brilliant at Southampton (Same as Poch) few bad games here and there bt southampton play with flair and sometimes no fear and thats what we lask the most!
While Shelvey's talent
is not under
question, his temperament certainly
is, but West Ham fans have seen their manager get the best
out of a maverick talent in the form
of Marko Arnautovic, who seemed like the flop signing
of the summer under Slaven Bilic, but has emerged a new player
since the arrival
of the Scotsman.
Losing four matches in a row for the first time
since 2002, Arsenal
are drifting further and further away from their rivals and the
question of whether or not Wenger
is allowed to see
out his contract looms large.
His knowledge
of the game has
been questioned however by some sections
of the media, with Houllier
being out of touch with management
since leaving French outfit Lyon in 2007, while the Villa fans
are concerned that Houllier's French connections will lead to the club recruiting more foreign players instead
of O'Neill's favoured route
of uncovering hidden English gems like Ashley Young and Gabriel Agbonlahor.
With termination
being out of the
question, these moms may decide that there
is no benefit to having an amniocentesis
since it would carry a small risk and would not change the outcome.
For a newborn, whose tiny nasal passages
are prone to congestion, a bad case
of the sniffles
is more than enough to cause misery, especially
since the use
of cough medicine and decongestants
are out of the
question for children younger than 2.
I remember asking for a snack around 3 pm and they said they only had fruit salad (
since my daughter's tummy wasn't that great as it
was, fruit
was out of the
question).
Since money's so tight, spa treatments
are really
out of the
question.
I have
been a lover
of babywearing
since my first but buying an expensive carrier
was out of the
question.