Sentences with phrase «is problematic even»

The 60 - 70 year period of the AMO is problematic even today for separating AGW from natural fluctuations.

Participation in large amounts of sedentary behavior is problematic even for individuals who meet weekly physical activity guidelines (i.e., «active couch potatoes»).

This is problematic even if the employer neither plans for, nor foresees, his employers using such services.

The old teaching is seen to be problematic even for God.

With a scooter, this can be problematic even if it folds in half.

I think casein is generally harmless in people with good gut integrity, while gluten, soy, and corn can be problematic even to people with healthy guts.

The stepwise regression was problematic even in the 1960s and has been totally discredited as a method for estimating causal effects in the 50 years since.

Not exact matches

«And even if she was not the main driving force behind any of the problematic areas of the McGuinty government, she was on board when they were made.

Even if the relevant counterfactual were a world with TPP versus one without, the 20,000 estimate would be highly problematic, but much of the potential for job loss falls away completely when the more pertinent counterfactual is used.

Even setting aside the Spirit of Christmas and year - round considerations of social justice, this trend is highly problematic.

While this would always be problematic, it's even more challenging now given that U.S. valuations are still elevated.

«Even at a large discount, this is a very problematic IPO,» Hamilton said.

All of this is problematic for investors and portfolio managers, even as it is advantageous for governments and other borrowers.

Even though that religion has promoted ethics in human societies, which has served humanity fairly well, the above hypothesis has created problematic culture in human societies, which is harmful to animals, environment, and humanity as a whole.

Whiteheadians seem able to imagine such ecstatically spanned unities - across - time on the so - called «microscopic» scale of the «specious present,» but give up on the idea as the scope of the temporal disclosure space is widened to the scale of human lifetime and of generations.7 But worse than this from the point of view of Heidegger's temporal problematic, by submitting the ecstatic unities of their «specious presents» to the before / after ordering and metric properties of linear time, at least in terms of their mutually external relations and arrangements, they give back ontologically every advantage they gained from the use of an cc - static - temporal disclosure horizon in the first place, even though it was only the single horizon of presence.

Matthew's Gospel reminded us that it was problematic to feel good about one's goodness but even more problematic to feel pride in one's ability to express remorse.

He pointed out that «it isn't always easy today to speak about fatherhood and, not having adequate role models, it even becomes problematic to imagine God as a father.»

Only faith derived from Christian preaching is able to deduce the certainty of God acting upon us even from those fragments, which otherwise would remain only a small part of the history of ideas, and quite a problematic part at that.»

In some cases, there may be people that are born with differences that are problematic when they act upon them, such as psychopathology... however even this is tricky.

The problem of unifying otherness or difference is, even at this level, problematic.

It then analyzes how even an ostensibly logical argument is rendered problematic and even self - contradictory by extraneous details or slippages in meaning which at first appear peripheral and unimportant.

So here is what we do: We change the name of Christmas to Goodwill Toward Humankind Day and scrap anything that even remotely smacks of religion, because in the end, taking into account every single religion is problematic.

Even so, a couple statements seem problematic and pursuing them might be valuable as a defense: And Christianity, properly understood, is entirely....

To the people on the left (to use admittedly problematic categories), doing good and being «sincere» often appear more important than believing correctly, and even the thought of condemning anyone for heresy seems embarrassing.

What makes this and parallel statements in other writings problematic is that some of the very concepts that Hartshorne classifies as «literal» are elsewhere implied to be matters of degree rather than of all or none and are even said to be «analogical» when applied to God.

If the claim that God must somehow be experienced directly and universally already appears problematic, given the sheer fact of non - and even a-theistic religions and philosophies, how much more - problematic must it be when it becomes the claim that God is everywhere consciously known!

And even Parsifal, problematic though it is, is not as obviously objectionable as Tannhäuser.

Although even the word «belief» is problematic for me now.

Yet even that hope is tempered by an awareness of the institutionally successful but theologically problematic dynamics of entrepreneurial evangelicalism that, through the church - growth movement and related strategies, perpetuate and increase ecclesial fragmentation.

The fact that such a distinction is incoherent even in the wider political society does little to help us challenge an even more problematic character in relationship to the church.

Intelligent Design, or ID, in inverse contrast, tends to assume a God who only occasionally bestirs himself to action; even if this were not already unacceptable theistically, its «solutions» prove deeply problematic and vulnerable scientifically as well...

Even as a public token of religious identity it is problematic when most people are unable to explain it properly even to themselves, let alone to othEven as a public token of religious identity it is problematic when most people are unable to explain it properly even to themselves, let alone to otheven to themselves, let alone to others.

This psychological honesty — whereby the soul understands that it must govern the body and the body learns that it is empty without the soul — may become a great strength in the face of a world untutored by this tension, unbound by this problematic, even comic posturing of devotion to the law and its enforcement.

Even more problematic according to Nobo, however, is one of the consequences of Ford's approach.

Yet even here, «performance» is problematic.

I've spent the evening — well, what was left of it after dinner and baths and stories and the rosary and people wanting to keep their lights on after lights out and other people wanting to take showers upstairs at the same time that the dishes were being washed downstairs, which is problematic in an old house — scrolling through the website of the Jennmaur Gallery, which

Another term used to describe those three related traditions, «monotheistic,» is even more problematic.

I will even venture that it won't be too long before acceptance becomes problematic because it also suggests allowing something from a position of power and superiority.

These things are problematic to focus on, since they are deeply personal, yet on a societal level they make very little difference — meaning that they can alienate someone very quick, yet, even their perfect application (lifelong marriages between men and women only) would not cure our social ills — what about wars, starvation, national debt, environmental decay, cheating banks, resource depletion, peak oil etc. etc?

Rather, they feel a call to marry, even if at the same time they sense that it is a very problematic calling.

Much pressure is put upon this by what the document calls the «problematic features» that «The Act unfortunately retains a feature of recent English Law... acceptance of certain decisions to bring about death», namely intentional killing by «omission», even and especially «of food and water» (p. 19).

It is peculiarly problematic for a generation for whom external, given authority of any kind — even that of our X and Y chromosomes — is something to be ignored or overcome.

But I realize the lids are still plastic and therefore could have other problematic chemicals, even though no BPA.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

Of course it would be silly to suggest that winning any game, cup or otherwise, isn't good for the club, but let's remember just how problematic FA Cup success has been for this club... I'm certainly not going to suggest I didn't enjoy seeing Arsenal win, I'm a fan of this club first and foremost, but how bad are things when you find yourself secretly wishing that your own team lost so that just maybe real change would finally come... I resent this team for even making me feel such thoughts and it's going to take a lot of effort on their part to earn my trust again... this club has treated the fans so poorly that it has created an incredibly fragile and toxic environment, so much so that a «what have you done for me lately» mentality has emerged... fans rise and fall depending on the results of each game because we don't have faith in those in charge to make the necessary changes to personnel and tactics... each time we win many fans attack any dissenting voices and make unrealistic claims about the players, the manager and the potential for unprecedented success... every time we lose the boo - birds run rampant, calling for heads to roll and predicting the worst... regardless of what side you fall on, it's not your fault, both sides are simply overcompensating for the horrible state of affairs that have been percolating for several years... it's hard to take the long view when those in charge have lied incessantly and refuse to take any responsibilities for their own actions... in the end, we are trapped by the same catch - 22 that ManU faced upon Fergie's exit... less fearful of maintaining the status quo than facing the unknown, which was validated, wrongly or rightly, by witnessing the difficulties they have faced during this transitory period... to be honest, the thing that scares me most is that this team has never prepared whatsoever for this eventuality, which considering our frugal nature and the way we have shunned many of our most revered former players is more than a little disconcerting

The 28 year old's strong running, never say die attitude has made him even more of a fans favourite and at times he has been handed the captain's armband and shown great character in what has at times been a problematic campaign for the Etihad Stadium club.

Even if they are problematic in their approaches, the results often justify the means.

If they can somehow keep Avram Grant at the club then they have a chance of bouncing straight back but in many ways the playing side of the equation is less problematic than finding the money that prevents the club from folding before the season even ends.

She has millions to help her provide for her children (although even nannies can be problematic) and I did not.

As a result, a frenulum attached too tightly to the base of the tongue can be even more problematic.