Sentences with phrase «is pure science»

Note: This is pure science not PNS here whatsoever.

The issue of whether or not climate change is happening, and determining the cause, is pure science with an immutable truth behind it.

However faithful this movie might or might not be, what can be said is that this is pure science fiction and is as thought - provoking, intellectually challenging and as spiritually fascinating as anything that's hit theatres this side of 2014's Under the Skin or 2012's Cloud Atlas.

This is pure science.

A nice distinction came up in a conversation earlier this week: writing good headlines and subject lines is a creative art, but picking the right ones to use is pure science.

Theology differs from such modes of thinking about God and man because it is a pure science, disinterested as all pure science is disinterested, seeking to put aside all extraneous, private and personal interests while it concentrates on its objects for their own sake only.

I'm a non-believer... (thank god)... but reading all these comments on this religious nonsense is amazing... I get it when third world illiterates regurgitate the scripture... but for the rest of humanity it's pure science fiction... can't beat it... it's a real money maker... let's take money and tax exemption out of the religious equation especially for the mega churches... and we'll see how long it lasts... anybody got a stop watch...

An astronomer's work can be pure science — gathering and analyzing data from instruments and creating theories about the nature of cosmic objects — or the work can be applied to practical problems in space flight and navigation, or satellite communications.

There can not be a pure science of bodybuilding, due to the many intangibles of the individual trainer, but perhaps, this is one of the few semi-scientific methods.

For example, I had a book I did called «On Top of the Dead» which was a pure science fiction story with aliens and everything.

My last post which was sent into oblivion was pure science and did not violate any rule, it just posed a question whose answer invalidates CAGW.

Its distinctive flowers — they look like a cross between an inverted umbrella and a tutu - clad ballerina en points — are pure science fiction - fantasy and it was surely these other - worldly looks that appealed to the Victorians, who first made collecting this sub-tropical flower species so very fashionable in Britain.

Not exact matches

The «students» tend to be scientists and academics who are working on big science challenges — hairy problems in biotech and pure technology — funded by the NSF.

This trend is going to accelerate with token sales, as folks who are even more predisposed to the pure computer science end of the spectrum end up founding valuable protocols.

Science is not influenced by belief as you suggest because many scientists with different beliefs validate the experiments, unlike religion which is pure belief with no evidence.

Did Christians and all religious people just wake up and realize their religions are pure BS, and decided to embrace reality and science instead?

Unlike Marx and others who tried to turn socialism into a science and thought they knew what would happen, Rorty's religion is radically open to, adamantly insistent upon, the new — making possible a life of «pure, joyous hope.»

@Kenrick Benjamin: «Skytag - Science have taken us back to the orgin where pure energy is eternal, we all know that Energy is govern by properties (Motion, Heat and Light) however energy it self is not sentient, so how did the porperties get it's LAWS.»

Skytag - Science have taken us back to the orgin where pure energy is eternal, we all know that Energy is govern by properties (Motion, Heat and Light) however energy it self is not sentient, so how did the porperties get it's LAWS.

The primary motive behind HGI is the one that drives all pure science: the need to know.

Christians are then left pointing to sociological maladies to vindicate our claims or appealing to the authority of a «pure science» which doesn't exist; or in the case of «same sex marriage,» we're reduced to pleading for private exemptions from public «justice.»

When, in the universe in movement to which we have just awakened, we look at the temporal and spatial series diverging and amplifying themselves around and behind us like the laminae of a cone, we are perhaps engaging in pure science.

This pursuit, when an adjective is needed, is designated as pure science or descriptive science.

For one thing, Hegel says as much: «As science, truth is pure self - consciousness in its self - development and has the shape of the self, so that the absolute truth of being is the known Notion and the Notion as such is the absolute truth of being (das an und für sich seiende).

First, a purely juridical order devoid of metaphysical and theological judgment is as logically and theologically impossible as a pure, metaphysically innocent science.

thats why we have to debate more and realize that our diferrences are just superficial misunderstanding, that to be united to a common belief in him can be logical and true only with the belief that we are evolving to attain a better relationship for all of us.Proven by science that all humans evolved from one parent, who evolved from lower forms of life, who evolved from pure energy through the big bang and guided by the spirit or conciousness of His Will.

This understanding of the limited scope of scientific method had been generally accepted since Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (1781); but in nineteenth - century evolutionary parlance it took on the specific meaning that «all beginnings and endings are lost in mystery,» a phrase that became commonplace in the sciences and social sciences as a way of dismissing or circumventing probing questions that sought to assess the larger implications or consequences of scientific analysis.

In Science and the Modern World, Whitehead argues strongly against the value of pure abstraction because it leads to thinking that is detached from concrete reality and it leads to narrow specialization.

They cause people to hate science but be pure hypocrites when they use it as long as it makes the comfy.

Pure science is proven by observation of fact.

This vocational emphasis affects not only the manifestly practical fields of study, such as the technical and professional disciplines, but even the «pure» liberal arts and sciences, which have commonly been represented as the studies appropriate for the nurture of the free man — studies whose justification and worth lie solely in themselves and not in any extrinsic purposes.

Apparently, all of our modern technology is the product of pure blind luck given the underlying science is, according to creationists, inherently unreliable...

As being can never be studied as an independent object, the history of metaphysical thought can not be without implications for the history of being:» [E] very science goes through a process of historical development in which, although the fundamental or general problem remains unaltered, the particular form in which this problem presents itself changes from time to time; and the general problem never arises in its pure or abstract form, but always in the particular or concrete form, determined by the present state of knowledge or, in other words, by the development of thought hitherto.

Considering the proofs for the existence of a god are based almost exclusively on pure logic, or a mixture of logic and science, your statement is a bit laughable.

It is important that there be opportunities for the pursuit of the «pure» arts and sciences, without regard to their application to any present problem.

But surely she knows that there have been many other Darwinians, from Thomas Henry Huxley in Darwin's day to Richard Dawkins today, who have gone beyond the boundaries of pure science and used «Darwinism» as a metaphysical stick with which to beat theism in general and Christianity in particular.

funny... my graduate degree is in a pure science field and it has never caused any conflict between my Catholic faith and science.

Besides, pure undoctrinated faith is not rational by definition, so it is never in conflict with a rational science.

According to its founders, Divine Science «has always taught that so - called matter is pure divine energy manifesting as form; it repeatedly points out that Substance is Spirit.»

Intellectually, there are growing numbers of scientists, technicians, philosophers, and scholars who practice an «advocacy science and scholarship» which challenges head - on conceptions of science, technology, and scholarship as value neutral activities of pure and disinterested elites.

Now even if there is no direct exposition of the «death of God» in the Science of Logic, every movement of this purely forward moving logic is an abstract realization of this «death,» for not only is a metaphysical transcendence here dissolved, but every trace of a truly and finally transcendent God has vanished, and this vanishing is the realization of a pure and total immanence.

What about pure science or theoretical physics (as opposed to merely experimental physics — I was reminded of the deep significance of that distinction from watching THE BIG BANG THEORY)?

Bulletin editorials have criticized the tendency of scientists to become «morally irresponsible stooges in a science factory»; and yet they have recognized that in pure research and even in some applied fields it is impossible to predict all uses of new discoveries, much less what their wider effects will be.

«Pure science» is justified by the applications to which it may eventually lead in unexpected ways, but it is also valuable as part of man's quest for knowledge.

This is true even in the most exact of pure sciences, mathematics.

Therefore, he agrees, theology is not an inquiry that can be included in the arts and sciences, which attend only to «pure» sciences.

Some are based on pure logic, some based on science and material causation, others on a mix of the two.

That we ought to love these neighbors with rejoicing and with reverence, with gratitude and with loyalty is the demand we dimly recognize in our purer moments in science and religion, in art and politics.

In religion and science there is a constant conflict between the devotees of pure endeavor after truth and the seekers after immediate, tangible results.

'» The determination with which evolutionists insist that chance be read as the opposite of purpose can be seen in the way they speak of «blind» and «pure» chance, when there are no such things in science itself.