Sentences with phrase «is right when»

Stephen Strauss is right when he says that terms like «blueprint» and «book of life» are poor metaphors for the...

He stressed that: «A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community.

«We'd like Good Earth Power to succeed,» Schulke said, who acknowledged Good Earth Power is right when it says there is limited trucking and mill capacity available in northern Arizona today.

Nick Clegg is right when he argues for institutional stability, an end to the permanent cultural revolution in Europe.

Like I've repeatedly said, it is difficult to get anyone to vote for what is right when the cost for that vote comes out of one's paycheck!

On the cost of pensions: Astorino said Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner is right when she says the biggest uncontrolled costs in local government are in employee pensions and health care.

Perhaps, Professor Sherrill is right when he told me that «severe punishment may be the only way to cure the [Legislature].»

The right felt gay marriage should be left to the states but left appointed judges have now deemed that all states must abide by their moral interpretation of what is right when it comes to gay marriage.

«Bernie Sanders is right when he says it will take a political revolution to make the real change working families need,» said State Director Bill Lipton.

Senator Schumer is right when he says, «If there is any attempt to water down these regulations we will block them.»

The Courant is right when it comes to Connecticut needing a plan to grow [May 10 editorial, courant.com, «Where's The Plan To Grow?»].

It seems fairly clear to me that the Treasury report is right when it argues that, for the next decade or so at least, people in Scotland will be significantly better off by staying in the Union.

Mr. Espada is right when he charges he is being targeted by persons out to discredit his every legislative effort.

I think Will Buckley is right when he says that, in the same way that 1967 is remembered as the Summer of Love, 2009 will be remembered as the Summer of Accountancy.

That's what Stephan did in the forest, saying simply: «A thing is right when it enhances the stability and beauty of the total ecosystem.

But SNA's «baby with the bathwater» approach is so extreme, it does make me wonder if Woldow is right when she speculates that SNA's corporate sponsors are actually behind this whole grain request.

Be sure you check your car seat's manual to know which setting is right when you are on the move.

Yet Ken is right when she says we need to raise their awareness of what's going on in the cafeteria and why it matters.

But Chloe is right when she says she isn't really «learning anything.»

tim is right when he says that EVERY bpl team is bigger, stronger, faster, and more physical than EVERY ligue un team.

Mr. Boyle is right when he says that a steel company (the Bethlehem Steel Co., to spare the more public - spirited firms from possible misidentification) has ripped the guts out of the very best, but much remains that can still escape the exploiters and speculators.

In a sense, Wenger is right when he says that the pundits focus their discussion more on their pre-conceived notion of the players and the managers rather than talk about the on - pitch action.

I suppose it all depends on how reliable this man is and whether he really has got some inside information on the transfer dealings of his former club, but most Arsenal fans will certainly be hoping that the Napoli legend Jose Alberti is right when he says that Gonzalo Higuain will be leaving the Serie A club for Arsenal, not Manchester United as was being reported earlier in the week.

Wenger is right when he says that....

Mourinho is right when he says it is easy when you have no pressure to win the title.

No - one on here or anywhere else seriously thinks we have any chance but No. 10 is right when he says IF (massively BIG f**k off «IF») we win all 8 then we have a «very slim» chance.

I believe that Arsene is right when he says this referee sees what he wants to see (and that is always against the Arsenal).

That's where he has to prove that Olshey is right when he said that he is untouchable.

He is right when he says that Stoke would always be motivated against Arsenal.

Wenger is right when he bemoaned the paucity of «quality strikers» recently.

I've never used Arrowroot powder before, so how do I know if this is right when I don't know who the provider is.

Ella is right when she says that they are all unrefined thus not bad for you, but it depends on your sweet tooth There are also fats, proteins and fibers so the blood sugar level should stay pretty stable Hope this helps.

I think Hameed Al Drie is right when he says «God is merciful and compassionate, even when our sins are many.»

If such be the case, then Hegel is right when in his chapter on «The Good and the Conscience,» he characterizes man merely as the particular and regards this character as «a moral form of the evil» which is to be annulled in the teleology of the moral, so that the individual who remains in this stage is either sinning or subjected to temptation (Anfechtung).

Daniel Berrigan is right when he scathingly denounces the ruthless side of Israeli policies, but he flirts with anti-Semitism when he comes close to begrudging Jews any entry into the sphere of nationalism.

Arthur Hertzberg is right when he claims that the privilege of nationalism is proper and necessary for Jews, but he errs egregiously when he substitutes the charge of anti-Semitism for an explanation of Israeli complicity in oppressive policies.

Cobb is right when he says that the term theology has increasingly narrowed in meaning to the point where it now refers to an academic specialty.

I think James Cone is right when he says: «Theologians of the Christian Church have not interpreted Christian ethics as an act for the liberation of the oppressed because their views of divine revelation were defined by philosophy and other cultural values rather than by the biblical theme of God as the liberator of the oppressed.»

He is right when he says that materialism can not explain the rise of the good, that monistic and idealistic schemes can not explain the rise of evil, and that traditional concepts of God's power make God the despotic cause of all evil.

Yet it is right when he speaks in the nature of man, that we should see that the «Father» is still hisfruition, in the Divine Person, and that we should see in his human nature also, as the Son of Man and High Priest of Mankind, the reverence, the subordination, and the joy with which we should be swept up in and through him to the Father.

A work situation is right when one works voluntarily from a service motive, under a sense of divine calling, and does the most creative job his talents permit; when one finds deep enjoyment in his work and has happy relations with his associates; when it does not overtax his physical strength or his nerves, and leaves some time for interesting and productive leisure; and when one receives for this work an income adequate to meet his needs without anxiety.

Talk about a massive amount of ignorance and Pat is right when he stated that you'll lose more young people in the church if people continue to believe such nonsense.

Marianne Sawicki is right when she states, «The first evangelists find that they can not bring anyone to the possibility of resurrection through the mere telling of a story.»

Surely Anselm is right when he contends that forgiveness can not be the result of a benign fiat bloodlessly decreed from heaven.

For that reason» much as this assertion will stick in the craw of Phillip Johnson» Richard Dawkins is right when he says that «biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed.»

Dana Gioia is right when he says that his essay has something in it «to depress, anger, or offend every reader.»

Maybe Reinhold Niebuhr is right when he says in his aptly titled book Moral Man and Immoral Society that what counts as moral in the private sphere can find no purchase in the social sphere.

It is not true, he is not in despair, and yet he is right when he says it.

Maybe Hauerwas is right when he claims that «Niebuhr's god is not a god capable of offering salvation in any material sense.

They are what they are no matter where you cut them, and they will do what is right when any alternative would be easier.