Noe et al. (1992) assessed erector spinae muscle activity during
an isokinetic machine deadlift, and found that erector spinae muscle activity peaked at 83 % of lift height, which was after the point where peak force output was produced (67 % of lift).
Comparing two different velocities using
an isokinetic machine deadlift, Noe et al. (1992) found no differences in erector spinae muscle activity between two different bar speeds (45.7 vs. 30.5 cm / s).
Comparing two different velocities during
an isokinetic machine deadlift test, Noe et al. (1992) found no differences in quadriceps muscle activity between the two speeds used (45.7 vs. 30.5 cm / s).
Comparing two different velocities during
an isokinetic machine deadlift test, Noe et al. (1992) found no differences in latissimus dorsi muscle activity between the two speeds used (45.7 vs. 30.5 cm / s).
Comparing two different velocities during
an isokinetic machine deadlift test, Noe et al. (1992) found no differences in gluteus maximus muscle activity between the two speeds used (45.7 vs. 30.5 cm / s).
Comparing Olympic weightlifters and untrained control subjects during
an isokinetic machine deadlift test, Noe et al. (1992) found no differences in latissimus dorsi muscle activity between the two groups.
Not exact matches
That is why training with a
isokinetic Hydra - Gym
machine, which offers no eccentric stimuli, will create no hypertrophy.
Although both types of external load were variable, the
machine knee extension would still have involved a larger contraction at longer muscle lengths than the
isokinetic device.