Higher percentages of charter school students of every race attend predominantly minority schools (50 - 100 % minority students) or racially
isolated minority schools (90 - 100 % minority students) than do their same - race peers in traditional public schools.
Half of Latino charter school students, for example, attended racially
isolated minority schools.
Not exact matches
In some
school communities, like New York City, many poor and
minority students are attending under - resourced
schools that are not only separate and
isolated, but that are also just as unequal as they were in the mid-20th century.
The data also shows that Latinos, the nation's largest
minority, have become increasingly
isolated for the last 30 years, with segregation surpassing that of blacks, and the rapid growth of suburban
minorities has not produced integrated
schools.
In their apology for the American
school, David Berliner and Gene Glass seek to reassure Americans by trying to
isolate the problem to
minority groups or those of low income.
A new report released by the Government Accountability Office finds that poor,
minority students are increasingly
isolated from their white, affluent peers in
school.
Critics worried that charters would target more advantaged suburban populations, skimming off the students most likely to succeed and leaving traditional public
schools in low - income and
minority neighborhoods even more
isolated, underfunded, and burdened with the toughest student cases.
Two arguments were advanced for targeting low - income,
minority, and immigrant groups in racially and economically
isolated charter
schools: the need to maximize bang for the educational buck, and the belief that the special needs of these communities could be better addressed in concentrated settings.
Since the support of families is considered crucial to educational achievement, weak relationships between
schools and parents in segregated
minority environments highlight a critical disadvantage that racially and socioeconomically
isolated schools must overcome, on top of a myriad of other well - documented deficits, including high teacher turnover.
While Voices says it's not fair to compare
schools that are serving fewer high - need students, the New Haven - based group says
isolating minority students into charter
schools is not the best practice.
And finally, in New Haven, where the commissioner portrayed the Amistad Academy as an extraordinary success, the public
schools have 86.9 %
minority populations while Achievement First's Amistad Academy is far more racially
isolated with 98.1 % of students being
minority.
This was nine years after the Supreme Court ruled that segregated
schools violated the constitution, but most
minorities were still
isolated in their own classrooms.
Connecticut's capitol city of Hartford has a
school system that is 92.6 %
minority and, once again, the charter
schools in the city are even more racially
isolated.
Black and Latino students are again increasingly
isolated in predominantly
minority schools.
Tracking, therefore, unfairly
isolates low - income and
minority students in what amounts to a resegregation of students within
schools (Oakes and Guiton, 1995).
Could
minority and students with disabilities
isolate themselves and quit coming to
school because of tracking or watered down curriculum that is boring lacking in inquiry?
If you've been
isolated your entire life from the rich fabric of the Canadian population, attending prestigious private
schools, and maintained a tight and homogeneous social network throughout university, you ultimately have no idea how to understand or advocate on behalf of
minorities and historically marginalized populations.