It is not even 1999 when even then it was seen as nearly a crime to report favourably on what the BBC described in a supposedly neutral statement about those who want to leave the EU as «
isolationists wanting to cut the UK off from the world».
Not exact matches
Others are
isolationist, meaning they mostly
want to be left alone, keeping wealth in and undesirable foreigners out.
This is the Trumpian Republican Party: skeptical of international agreements and with
isolationist instincts while
wanting to engage with enemies through «tough» talk and short - term military action.
First off, Mr. Casely Hayford noted on The Big Issue that it was «very unlikely that the government, in its
isolationist's view will go and say we
want to extend the programme.»
Jeremy Corbyn speaks for the fifty percent of Labour party members and supporters who
want an
isolationist foreign policy,
want Trident scrapped, believe in printing and spending more money, and believe in demonizing the business community.
Cameron does not
want his party to be seen as
isolationist: and he
wants the world to know that's how he stands.
For example, if hypothetically a NATO country is attacked and the US refused to help (for some reason, e.g. it has an
isolationist President or it doesn't
want to escalate the conflict into a world war), can someone go to a US court and make it force the US government to do it?