I think
the issue about fossil fuel «subsidies» which keeps popping up among the True Believers, needs further explanation, though.
Not exact matches
While the money is modest compared with that donated by
fossil fuel interests, the support provides GOP candidates with added credibility on clean energy, an
issue polling shows swing voters care
about.
On Tuesday, a Twitter account for Badlands National Park, in South Dakota, posted a series of tweets
about climate change, an
issue that President Trump has called a hoax while promising to promote the drilling and use of
fossil fuels.
Discovering Shale Gas: An Investor's Guide to Hydraulic Fracturing of Shale Plays explores in detail the environmental and social impacts of shale gas development in the United States, identifying key questions for investors and also broader
issues about shale gas development's implications for extending the era of
fossil fuel dominance.
A small but growing number of countries now have legal requirements for institutional investors to report on how their investment policies and performance are affected by environmental factors, including South Africa and, prospectively, the EU.36 Concern
about the risks of a «carbon bubble» — that highly valued
fossil fuel assets and investments could be devalued or «stranded» under future, more stringent climate policies — prompted G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors in April 2015 to ask the Financial Stability Board in Basel to convene an inquiry into how the financial sector can take account of climate - related
issues.37
There are frequent rail accidents and pipeline explosions, evidence of long term water contamination esp around Dimock PA and in WY, non disclosure agreements forced on people whose health has been damaged from exposure to toxic emissions, secrecy
about all of these
issues, and climate changes caused by too much
fossil fuel emissions.
That said, in general - in the United States, at least - the
issue isn't so much
about denying global warming as much as it is
about protecting and favoring the major
fossil fuel industries:
SHARE co-chair Mert Simpson told The Alt that the organization has had discussions with Assembly members McDonald and Fahy
about halting the use of
fossil fuels in the project, leading them to bring the
issue to the Assembly.
It is vital in sustainability education to give space for learners to develop their own visions for a sustainable future whilst reminding participants
about the
issues underpinning the need for change — climate change, peak oil, global inequity and the financial cost of
fossil fuels.
Recycling is high on the agenda for the schools - which both belong to Focus - Trust, a charitable multi-academy trust based in the North West of England — with Thornhill receiving a shout out from local MP Paula Sherriff during Prime Minister's Question Time after she received a letter from students concerned
about the UK's reliance on
Fossil Fuels; an
issue the MP said that, if tackled, would support the sustainable future of the green economy.
Even for those of you who are interested in seeing a reduction in our dependence on
fossil fuels — and I know how passionate young people are
about issues like climate change — the fact of the matter is, is that for quite some time, America is going to be still dependent on oil in making its economy work.
My focus is on the accusation that skeptic climate scientists are paid
fossil fuel industry money to lie
about the
issue to the public.
But after years of disappointments on climate
issues, protestors say that dropping the pipeline is a chance for the Obama Administration to prove it is still serious
about combating climate change and freeing the US from its long dependence on
fossil fuels.
Read more
about the cities» lawsuits: Climate Legal Paradox: Judges
Issue Dueling Rulings for Cities Suing
Fossil Fuel Companies
But with
fossil fuels, the
issue is no longer just
about siting, choosing among sources carefully, or mitigating impacts after the fact; we must stop expanding their use immediately and categorically, and transition away from them over time.
Notice, by the way, that the
issue here isn't just
about pushing «renewable energy» as an alternative to
fossil fuels.
[2] Cook is the author of GelbspanFiles.com, where he «dig [s] deeply into the accusation that scientists and others who express skepticism
about the theory of man - made global warming are being paid by the
fossil fuel industry to lie
about the
issue.»
To quash the notion that no valid scientific criticism exists against the idea of man - caused global warming, enviro - activists often say «denier scientists» are paid by the
fossil fuel industry to lie
about the
issue, insinuating a parallel to expert «shills» who did the same for «big tobacco».
Climate change: IPCC
issues stark warning over global warming Call to «stop dithering
about fossil fuel cuts» as expert panel warns entire globe is affected
The reason goes back to the original point of the PR campaign by the
fossil fuel lobby — to create a sense of doubt in the public mind
about this
issue.
Epstein has launched a website, fossilfueldebate.com where he presents his case on the
issue — that «McKibben is dead wrong
about fossil fuels and our environment.»
I submit that Oreskes has long been little more than a mouthpiece in this
issue, basically just parroting what was already said in various talking points
about a «scientific consensus», journalists not needing to give equal time to skeptics, and that a set of Western
Fuels leaked memos indicts such skeptics as paid co-conspirators with
fossil fuel industry people.
And the larger question is, why do no others corroborate his accusation that skeptic scientists were paid to lie to the public by
fossil fuel interests
about the global warming
issue?
The
fossil fuel industry continues to try to confuse the public
about the real science of climate change, and Congress has dragged its feet on the
issue.
Needless to say this has been deeply disturbing to an «ordinary Joe» (with 5 grandchildren) who has made an effort to understand the science and the politics that underlie the climate change «debate», especially since my country has become such an important player in the
fossil fuel business with its tarsands and pipeline industries that affect us all, so I've tried to find out more
about Judith Curry's recent contributions to the debate, not so much the hair - splitting, angels on the head of a pin, esoteric dissections of graphs and stats that I see here on your website but the ethical stance that you take on the larger
issue of «killing» the IPCC and all it represents.
He'll talk
about building on our work to #StopAdani, the push for
fossil fuel divestment and the groundbreaking NYC legal case against five of the world's biggest oil companies, and ensure climate change is the number one
issue on any election agenda.
Moreover, I would suggest that those of us in «the electorate» who are well - informed
about this
issue are well aware that changes in public policy — including putting a price on carbon pollution, directly regulating GHG emissions, and providing effective support for the development and deployment of efficiency and renewable energy technologies on a scale at least comparable to the subsidies that
fossil fuels have received for a century — are far more effective than the options that any individual can currently choose, and are in fact crucial to making more such options available to all of us.
In this case, your unsupported generalization that «the electorate could not care less»
about climate change was rebutted with actual opinion polls showing that significant majorities of «the electorate» do, in fact, care a good deal, and consider the
issue a priority for the President and the Congress, and support policies to regulate GHG emissions and to hold
fossil fuel corporations responsible for the full costs of their products.
Deforestation a Much Larger
Issue Than
Fossil Fuels in Many Places And it would be even more poignant had he been speaking about production of palm oil in Indonesia and Malaysia, where due to greenhouse gas emissions associated with land conversion from rainforest to plantations, the emissions from the fuel made from these crops can be nearly 10 times as much as from conventional fossil
Fossil Fuels in Many Places And it would be even more poignant had he been speaking about production of palm oil in Indonesia and Malaysia, where due to greenhouse gas emissions associated with land conversion from rainforest to plantations, the emissions from the fuel made from these crops can be nearly 10 times as much as from conventional fossil f
Fuels in Many Places And it would be even more poignant had he been speaking
about production of palm oil in Indonesia and Malaysia, where due to greenhouse gas emissions associated with land conversion from rainforest to plantations, the emissions from the
fuel made from these crops can be nearly 10 times as much as from conventional
fossil fossil fuelsfuels.
The
issue is magnified by uncertainty
about the national and global economy, despite Australia's strong position, which strongly depends on
fossil fuels.
Of course, this is bad because natural gas is still a
fossil fuel that produces greenhouse gases, and the new natural gas discoveries require fracking, which brings a whole other bunch of
issues and uncertainties
about the environmental impact.
Every week, I'll bring you important stories from across the country
about the impacts and politics of climate change, the transition from
fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources and environmental
issues like water and public lands.