Not exact matches
«Our Education Committee will hold a second public hearing
in New York City on May 19 to further examine this
issue, giving Mayor de Blasio and his administration another chance to make their case
in a more thorough and more
convincing way.»
Most legislators are
convinced by Cuomo's efforts on paid family leave and they see the inclusion of it
in his budget and the
way he rolled out the
issue in the State of the State as a sign of steadfast commitment.
I suspect that they will win some of the Labour seats on their target list (and I listed the top 50
in that blog post last summer), but I'm not
convinced that there will be that many: their position on Iraq marked them out from the other two parties at the last election, leading them to the high water mark they reached - but Iraq will not be an
issue next year and it is hard to see which message they could put out which would resonate with voters
in the same
way.
The
issue for Searchlight will be
convincing them to pay 10 bucks for a documentary, let alone one that doesn't lean on the competition as its organizing principal, and whose personal narratives are
in some
ways not that different from what's available on a plethora of reality - heavy cable channels.
The
issue is that Baseball Riot plays it too safe, with very little
in the
way of features to
convince players that they're playing a brand new game.
(By the
way, I'm still not
convinced that Apple will use pricing, margins, and the totally bogus
issue of
in - app purchasing to try to freeze the Kindle and other ebook retailing apps off of its iPad, iPhone, and iPod Touch platforms.)
While the files were
in London, one writer noted: «Drawings are ideally viewed
in this
way; through the process of locating, removing and handling individual pieces qualities of spontaneity, experimentation and intuition are enhanced... A more
convincing representation of New York art than a dozen
issues of Artforum.»
Is there any
convincing evidence or analysis you see that says this is
in any
way about climate, particular, as distinct from the noted
issues with mercury
in rice and high smog levels and the like?
That said, I don't expect this to be a
convincing argument unless you have personal knowledge of the politics and environmental regulations of Alberta, which is
way too complicated an
issue to cover
in this forum (unfortunately).
We should be
way past the
issue of
convincing people of the real and present danger it poses, but unfortunately there's a very powerful and rich lobby with vested interests
in causing climate change and then denying it's even happening.
As a skeptic, my central
issue is that I am not
convinced that our noisy planet, with its intrinsic short and long term temperature variability from natural sources, can be adequately measured
in such a
way to detect anthropogenic CO2's warming affect.
The more you write, the more I'm
convinced you don't even have the conceptual framework
in your mind to deal with these
issues in any coherent
way.
It is called close minded thinking, and it is very different, and it usually finds
ways to substantiate itself — to
convince itself it is using reason and perpetuate the pattern and persistence
in a false belief or idea; only further enabled when so many others want to do the same, the
issue produces a lot of passion, and there is massive information (often put out by ideological think tanks who are fighting possible
ways of redress by instead sowing doubt over the
issue itself.)
As animal welfare becomes an ever more pressing
issue, even if bugs ended up being no more sustainable than conventional protein sources, the fact that they're not suffering
in the
way that a cow or pig or chicken does will
convince many people to eat them.
The museum
issued a statement that they think they can repair the painting
in a
way that is «unobtrusive» but others
in the art world are not
convinced.
BLAG's zealous advocacy
in support of Section 3, along with the myriad other cases winding their
way through the federal courts challenging that section,
convinced a majority of the Supreme Court to address the constitutional
issue.
«Intended behavior» or not, some of us didn't accept that the only
way to solve this
issue is to
convince developers to target Android 8.0
in an application update.
Earlier this week, however, OnePlus thought it'd be best to try to get
in front of the
issue, and went out of its
way to
convince customers that Apple's notch design is the only
way to go.
• Strong sales skills with exceptional
convincing power • Demonstrated ability to sell company products to customers as well as deal with competitive
issues • Strong computer and phone skills: Able to answer phone calls
in good manner, create MS Word documents, Excel spreadsheets, and create / maintain client accounts • Able to maintain neat and pleasant appearance
in a fast paced environment • Exceptional organizational and time management skills • Able to handle numerous tasks and arrange multiple files simultaneously • Proven ability to think
in an anticipatory
way, one step ahead of the process
I now consider myself a «Gottman Groupie» as I am
convinced that Gottman's research - based approach is the most accessible and effective
way of working with the complex
issues that couples often present with
in treatment.
(Most of the world doesn't think that
way...) I was even more
convinced that this tree was here to stay after seeing Holly's house
in a recent
issue of Country Living: