Not exact matches
Check out this free search tool and find information about individuals that have been named in SEC court actions or administrative proceedings and had
judgments or
orders issued against them.
Similarly, while there may be some value in the refusal to take a moral stance on homosexuality — in
order to focus squarely on the nature of marriage rather than on same - sex relationships — I am less than persuaded by the authors» moral
judgment that people's sexual relationships are a private
issue.
Without minimizing the great complexity of
issues in most concrete cases, which make snap
judgments out of
order, some principles can be affirmed.
In June»98 a U.S. District Court in Maryland threw out the suit in summary
judgment,
ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's court costs and
issuing a $ 30,000 sanction against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's claims.
NYS Education Commissioner David Steiner's
judgment and his own personal integrity are at
issue here, as well as the independence and disinterestedness of the panel he has named to advise him on whether to grant the waiver to unqualified Cathleen Black, which she needs in
order to assume the post of NYC Public Schools Chancellor.
Justice Okon Abang, in a
judgment on Monday
ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to immediately
issue a certificate of return to the plaintiff, Uche Ogah, who polled the second highest number of votes in the primary.
«The
issue before the trial court was whether the 1st respondent (PDP) can rubbish the
judgment /
order of the court for whatever reason and set up a caretaker committee, other claims notwithstanding.
In the lead
judgment of a five - man panel headed by the Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen, the apex court
ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission to withdraw the certificates of return
issued to them.
In a communiqué
issued at the end of the PDPGF meeting, late Wednesday night in Abuja, the governors frowned at the refusal of the acting National Chairman, Prince Uche Secondus, to honour the
judgment of an FCT High Court which last December
ordered him to vacate office for any other person from the North - East zone.
The
issue is probably too complex to resolve, though: Bringing
issues like billing
order or screen time into what is supposedly an artistic
judgment of people's acting work would be too crass an acknowledgement of the awards industry, even by Oscar standards.
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his
judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to
issue any
order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in
order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
If the debt is deemed valid, the court can
issue a
judgment against you,
ordering you to pay it — and legal fees.
Once the
judgment is finalized, the court may choose to
issue a garnishment
order against you.
WTO and NAFTA tribunals can not
issue injunctions
ordering the U.S. Congress, for example, to conform to its
judgments or to desist from enacting climate measures.
In that cause there could be a
judgment (but no
order) contingently disposing of all financial
issues.
Plaintiffs and defendant all filed motions for summary
judgment, and on Feb. 2, U.S. District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan
issued a memorandum ruling in favor of plaintiffs and an
order permanently barring Public.Resource.Org from posting any of the plaintiffs» standards.
If child support and alimony obligations are
judgments, why aren't temporary
orders on these
issues immediately appealable?
If you choose not to follow the Protocol, you
issue proceedings and either your debtor is familiar with the Protocol or instructs solicitors who are, then the following sanctions can be imposed by the court: - • An
order staying the proceedings which also requires compliance with the Protocol; • An
order that if you have not complied you pay the costs of the proceedings or part of the costs of the other side even if you obtain
judgment in your favour; • An
order that those costs are paid on a more stringent basis known as an indemnity basis; • An
order depriving the party who is at fault of any entitlement to interest or alternatively awarding interest at a reduced rate; • Depending on who is at fault the court can also
order payment of a higher interest rate of up to 10 % above base rate.
The brief urges the Supreme Court to hear the case, arguing that Alabama can not disregard the Georgia adoption
judgment simply because Alabama believes the Georgia court's adoption
order should not have
issued in the first place.
We also know that child custody
issues often arise after the court
orders the initial
judgment.
However, a court may reduce (modify) to include any of the requirements relating to probation and community control, a legal sentence imposed by it within 60 days of its imposition; after the receipt by the court of a mandate
issued by the appellate court upon affirmance of the
judgment and / or sentence upon an original appeal; after receipt by the court of a certified copy of an
order of the appellate court dismissing an original appeal from the
judgment and / or sentence; or if further appellate review is sought in a higher court or in successively higher courts, after the highest state or federal court to which a timely appeal has been taken under authority of law, or when a petition for certiorari has been timely filed under authority of law, has written an
order of affirmance or an
order dismissing the appeal and / or denying certiorari.
The husband was
ordered to pay the wife's costs, assessed at # 10,000, on the basis that it was his behaviour that had caused the wife to
issue the
judgment summons.
(a) a short form
order dated April 23, 2003,
issued and signed by the Honorable M. Ritholtz, granting Mr. Kaufman's motion for a default
judgment and referring the
issue of damages to an inquest, (b) the defendant's
order to show cause, signed by the Honorable M. Ritholtz on September 12, 2003, seeking to set aside the default
judgment, accompanied by defense counsel's signed affirmation and the defendant's signed, but not notarized, affidavit, (c) the respondent's affirmation in opposition to the defendant's
order to show cause, dated October 8, 2003, (d) a preliminary conference stipulation and
order dated March 17, 2004, signed by the respondent and defense counsel, and (e) a notice of compliance / settlement conference scheduled for October 21, 2004, before the Honorable M. Ritholtz.
The decision of the Court of Appeal in Department of Economic Policy and Development of the City of Moscow and another v Bankers Trust and another [2004] EWCA Civ 314, [2004] 4 All ER 746 raises
issues of potentially far - reaching significance vis - à - vis the public nature of
judgments and
orders pronounced by the English courts in the context of arbitration applications.
Delivering the lead
judgment in RFC2012 Plc (in liquidation)(formerly The Rangers Football Club Plc) v Advocate General for Scotland [2017] UKSC 45, Lord Hodge said: «The central
issue in this appeal is whether it is necessary that the employee himself or herself should receive, or at least be entitled to receive, the remuneration for his or her work in
order for that reward to amount to taxable emoluments.»
The suit seeks an
order barring the federal government from
issuing new DACA permits or renewing existing ones, as well as a declaratory
judgment that DACA violates the take care clause and the Administrative Procedure Act.
Sir Anthony Clarke MR (giving the
judgment of the court): The facts found by the judge were that the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq (following the ousting of the government of Saddam Hussain) had
issued an
order whereby the multinational force (of which British troops formed a pArt) should be «immune from Iraqi legal process» and that all personnel should be «subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of their sending States».
The most unexpected aspect of this rather unique level of media attention is that it does not directly concern any particular judicial ruling by a Court, which, since it decided its first case in 1954, has
issued more than 28,000
judgments and
orders.
A prison sentence may be lenient or severe, but reason for its imposition comes from the person
issuing the
judgment and commitment
order.
An application can be made to the DIFC Court to recognise a foreign court money
judgment rendered in England (or from another jurisdiction) and once there is a DIFC Court
Judgment /
Order recognizing the foreign
judgment the party seeking enforcement can now request the DIFC Court to
issue an execution letter to the Chief Justice of the Dubai Courts pursuant to Article 7 (2) of the Judicial authority Law.
Similarly, Judge Gross ruled that the US Bankruptcy Code permits courts to «
issue any
order, process, or
judgment that is necessary or appropriate to carry out the provisions of the US Bankruptcy Code.
The Motion Judge
issues one set of reasons and one
order disposing of both a motion seeking certification of a class and a motion for partial summary
judgment against Dr. James.
The court's legal authority to hear your case and
issue legally enforceable
orders and
judgments.
If you and your spouse can not agree, then each spouse can submit arguments to the family law court, and a judge will
issue a temporary
order based on his or her own best
judgment.
As regards the first argument, they deployed the
judgment of the Court of Justice in CM v Commission, where it was held that the concept of restriction by object had to be interpreted restrictively (CM, para 58), in
order to claim that the Commission was not entitled to classify the agreements at
issue as restrictions by object (para 432).
a court
order (i.e. separation agreement or divorce
order /
judgment)
issued by a court of law in or outside Canada; or
In the first New York appellate decision to rule on the
issue, the Appellate Division, Second Department held in its February 28, 2018 opinion in Spencer v. Spencer, that violations of matrimonial action «Automatic
Orders» can be grounds for a finding of civil contempt, but an application for that relief must be made before the entry of the
judgment of divorce.
Specific topics which have been covered in recent conferences include judicial ethics; interpreters; delivering reasons for
judgment; assessing credibility; social media; technology and search warrants; managing a provincial offence trial; effectively communicating an oral
judgment; risk assessment and indicators of lethality at bail hearings; the Youth Criminal Justice Act; eye - witness identification; conducting pre-trials; specific
issues at trials of regulatory offences; fly - in - courts, residential schools; application of Gladue principles; mistrials and bias; accident reconstruction; search warrant
issues; domestic violence
issues;
orders for examination under the Mental Health Act; child apprehension warrants under the Child and Family Services Act; evidentiary
issues; discrimination and harassment in the workplace; stress management; and pre-retirement planning.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court
issued its final
order requiring that at least one - half of unclaimed funds in class action settlements and
judgments be directed to the Wisconsin Trust Account Foundation to support civil legal services to the poor.
However, the court would review the following four
issues if challenged by the respondent: (1) whether the foreign court lacks jurisdiction pursuant to Taiwanese laws; (2) whether a default
judgment is rendered against the losing defendant, but the notice or summons of the initiation of action had been legally served in a reasonable time in the foreign country or had been served through judicial assistance provided under the Taiwanese laws; (3) whether the performance
ordered by such
judgment or its litigation procedure is against Taiwanese public policy or morals; and (4) whether there exists no mutual recognition between the foreign country and Taiwan.
Judgments or
orders given or made in a claim on the group register in relation to the GLO
issues are binding on the parties to all other claims on the group register.
Bankhaus Wolbern & Co (AG & Co KG)(2) Vision 93 Konserveirungs Und Vermogensverwaltun GS GMBH & Co KG v China Construction Bank Corporation, Zhejiang Branch [2012] EWHC 3285 (Comm): jurisdiction challenge by a Chinese Bank in the context of a non exclusive English jurisdiction clause raising
issues as the applicability of Art 23
Judgments Regulation and relevance of a Chinese Court
Order prohibiting payment by the Chinese Bank under a refund guarantee.
In
order for the foreign
judgment to be registered, the AJA and FJA require that the foreign court should have had jurisdiction over the parties and the relevant
issues in dispute according to English law principles.
Walid Azzam, Partner, assess the new initiative for one day court proceedings and the ability of Public Prosecutors to
issue «Criminal
orders» [
judgments].
In
order to recognise and enforce a
judgment at common law, the party seeking enforcement (the claimant) must commence a new claim (by
issuing a Claim Form) as one would for any other claim.
In this
issue: Brexit: A Disputes Perspective; Court of Appeal considers non-party funding in two recent cases; Arbitration and enforcement bolstered by Australian High Court decision: freezing
order can be granted in expectation of a foreign
judgment or arbitration award; Conferences and events
(c) the court has taken into account in
issuing its
judgment the reasons for and evidence underlying the
order issued pursuant to Article 13 of the 1980 Hague Convention.
Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and DIFC Courts awards Dubai Courts jurisdiction in «conduit» cases: The Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of
judgments between the two courts, has
issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an
order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the
order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located there.
The Alabama Supreme Court held that it could not consider the constitutional
issues underlying the contempt
judgment which related to the power of the State to
order production of membership lists because review by certiorari was limited to instances
Notwithstanding a
judgment of non-return pursuant to Article 13 of the 1980 Hague Convention, any subsequent
judgment which requires the return of the child
issued by a court having jurisdiction under this Regulation shall be enforceable in accordance with Section 4 of Chapter III below in
order to secure the return of the child.