If the debt is deemed valid, the court can
issue a judgment against you, ordering you to pay it — and legal fees.
Not exact matches
The New Testament Gospels portray Jesus as speaking
against the oppressors of his people with prophetic words of
judgment that focus extensively on
issues of money and power.
Check out this free search tool and find information about individuals that have been named in SEC court actions or administrative proceedings and had
judgments or orders
issued against them.
The pollution
judgment against Chevron
issued in 2011 based on 105 technical evidentiary reports showing the oil major dumped billions of gallons of cancer - causing oil waste onto Indigenous ancestral lands.
While guarding
against a rush to
judgment, we can easily think of ministries that are pushing all or many of the current success buttons: they are carried out by a professional elite; they utilize the best marketing and media techniques; they dispense a personal fulfillment strategy to essentially anonymous folk who are regarded as consumers and called to respond in carefully prescribed ways which do not implicate them or their leadership in the more complex and controversial human
issues.
On the basis of experience from a variety of sources a religious person and the theologian formulate a theory which, like any theory dealing with complex
issues in science, is a matter of weighing one experience
against another, together with much subjective
judgment.
In June»98 a U.S. District Court in Maryland threw out the suit in summary
judgment, ordering Antonious to pay Spalding's court costs and
issuing a $ 30,000 sanction
against Stroup's law firm, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, for failing to do an adequate prefiling investigation of Antonious's claims.
A PEF council leader in Rockland County, Deborah J. Lee was found in 2013 to have misused a union -
issued bank card, making numerous personal purchases, which led to a court
judgment of $ 64,105
against her.
In Justice Mohammed's
judgment, which was read on his behalf by Justice Ejembi Eko, the apex court resolved all the three
issues raised in the appeals
against the appellants.
He directed that the appellants should raise the
issues in their interlocutory appea ls in when they file substantive appeals which they wish to file
against the Court of Appeal's
judgment delivered on Thursday.
The Appellate court in its
judgment delivered by Justice H.A.O Abiru upheld the decision of the lower court and resolved all
issues raised
against the appellant.
However, in considering the main appeal, a panel of five Justices of the Supreme Court in a unanimous
judgment today resolved all the
issues against the appellant (Daudu) and accordingly dismissed the appeal in its entirety.
Before that happened, the State Board of Education filed a declaratory
judgment action in Wake County Superior Court
against private schools, saying that religious schools didn't have a first amendment
issue.
«Your personal vendetta
against Malloy has clouded your
judgment, and now you are working at cross-purposes
against the educational and progressive
issues you used to champion.»
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his
judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States
against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to
issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
«What really triggered the trend [of manufacturers hedging their bets with Android devices by also developing Windows devices] isn't so much customer satisfaction
issues as much as that $ 1 billion
judgment against Samsung,» Enderle says, pointing to the sudden ramp - up of Windows Phone development by HTC and Samsung as examples.
Once the
judgment is finalized, the court may choose to
issue a garnishment order
against you.
If a
judgment is
issued against you, carefully review the court documents.
When repeated court
judgments are placed
against the borrower for wage garnishment, the employer could potentially fire the employee because of concern that the lack of credit could translate into an
issue of character.
It's quite likely that a
judgment would be
issued against the negligent party, and those can follow a person for the rest of their life.
The problem is that most people tend not to pay attention to this
issue, and borrow
against their better
judgment when in fact a cash advance loan should have been the last option.
If the case goes
against you then the judge will
issue a
judgment, at this point the collector must go back to the court and request a writ of garnishment.
You can not consolidate a default loan if a
judgment has been
issues against a defaulted loan which has not been dismissed.
In this
issue: Why breed - specific legislation should be a thing of the past; how good fostering programs help shelters save lives; running animal transport programs to save more lives; a Mississippi shelter makes inroads
against euthanasia; shelter directors take to the therapy couch to explore the
judgments we all make and how they impact our work; and more.
Last June the Court of Justice (CJEU)
issued an important
judgment regarding the scope of the transnational protection
against double jeopardy.
59 The answer to the first question and the first part of the third question is therefore that European Union law must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the
issue of
judgment by default
against a defendant on whom, given that it is impossible to locate him, the document instituting proceedings has been served by public notice under national law, provided that the court seised of the matter has first satisfied itself that all investigations required by the principles of diligence and good faith have been undertaken to trace the defendant.
57 In contrast to the situation of the defendant, who, when deprived of the opportunity to defend himself effectively, will have the opportunity to ensure respect for the rights of the defence by opposing, in accordance with Article 34 (2) of Regulation No 44/2001, recognition of the
judgment issued against him, the applicant runs the risk of being deprived of all possibility of recourse (see Hypoteční banka, paragraph 54).
A U.S. judge
issued a scathing decision on March 4 that found that American lawyer Stephen Donziger had used corrupt means to help villagers win the
judgment against Chevron in Ecuador.
However, they did reverse the summary
judgment against FedEx, finding that there is still a genuine
issue as to whether a duty was breached.
Our team of insurance coverage attorneys has advised individuals and businesses about insurance coverage
issues including insurance policy coverage opinions, declaratory
judgments on policy coverage and defense of insurers
against breach of contract and bad faith claims.
-- Hanco ATM Systems v. Cashbox ATM Systems [2007] EWHC 1599 (Ch): Led by Andrew Hochhauser Q.C. in relation to summary
judgment application
against senior employee for breach of fiduciary duty and dishonest assistance and involving
issues as to the doctrine of «preparatory steps».
This
judgment has also come along at a time when the European Court of Human Rights» decision is awaited in the four conjoined cases of Ladele, Eweida, Macfarlane and Chaplin, all of which involve
issues of religious freedom and two of which involve the same potential conflict between the right not to be discriminated
against on grounds of sexual orientation and the right to religious freedom (see our posts here, here and here).
Labour's strategy has been to seek to get the court to give a subsequent
judgment that allows consideration of national security
issues to be balanced
against the rights of the individual.
Moore - Bick LJ, giving the leading
judgment identified the primary
issue as being «whether a person who suffers damage as a result of findings of personal or professional misconduct leading to dismissal and loss of professional status that were made
against him in disciplinary proceedings conducted in breach of contract, but which would not otherwise have been made, can recover damages at large».
Billions of dollars in default
judgments have been
issued against Iran for sponsoring terrorism, according to the Law360 story.
The
judgment is among the largest ever
issued against a foreign nation under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, according to a press release by Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, which represented the plaintiffs with co-counsel Karsman McKenzie & Hart.
In August 2012, wife filed a petition to enforce the two
judgments against Mr. Dougall alleging he had made no effort to pay the
judgments issued against him.
The Court held that the motion judge erred in allowing summary
judgment on the negligence claim
against the Pearlmans where there were
issues of material fact whether Samantha knowingly permitted Thomas to operate her car in violation of a provision of G.L. c. 90 and whether that violation was causally related to the accident.
In a fifth case the Supreme Court
issued its final
judgment on a matter that had already been sent to Luxembourg for preliminary rulings on two occasions; it concerned the limitation period applying to claims brought
against producers of goods (O'Byrne v Aventis Pasteur MSD Ltd [2010] UKHL 23).
While there are a number of other
issues involved in this complex case, including claims that the
judgment was obtained by fraud, the facts before the Court were simple: there was a final
judgment in Ecuador
against Chevron for US$ 9.51 billion.
2008)-- Denial of manufacturer defendant's motion for summary
judgment in cases arising from explosion at facility in Groton, Connecticut on grounds that there existed genuine
issues of fact as to product liability and recklessness counts of case
against manufacturer based on its claimed failure to account for and disclose relevant safety and storage information of risks involved in the transport and storage of chemical reagent at ambient temperatures.
The
issues in this application were whether the applicants were entitled to summary
judgment on their harassment claim and whether the court should grant a permanent injunction pursuant to s. 3 (3) of the 1997 Protection
Against Harassment Act.
In Moloney v Alberta (Administrator, Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Act), the Alberta government refused to
issue a driver's licence to John Moloney because he has unpaid
judgment for personal injury damages
against him.
The judge didn't buy Bluestone's argument,
issuing summary
judgment against him in an Aug. 25 decision.
The same
issue comes up at the state level when a court awards a money
judgment against a state or local government with taxing power, or holds that a state government has insufficiently funded education as required by a state constitution.
Genuine
issues of fact precluded summary
judgment on a consumer's claims
against a seafood producer for allegedly making unlawful, false, and misleading advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).
Drafted motion for summary
judgment on behalf of a product manufacturer involving the economic loss doctrine and statute of limitations
issues that resulted in voluntary dismissal of the plaintiff's claims
against the manufacturer.
The Motion Judge
issues one set of reasons and one order disposing of both a motion seeking certification of a class and a motion for partial summary
judgment against Dr. James.
Buss JA in a separate
judgment suggested that the necessary «awareness» must mean knowledge or belief «with sufficient confidence reasonably to justify, in all the circumstances, the commencement of proceedings
against the proposed defendant on the relevant cause of action by the
issue of a writ or otherwise.»
It said it should be treated in the same way as a state and relied on Article 25 (c) of the Riyadh Convention, submitting that recognition of mutual
judgments should not apply to judgements
issued against the government of a contracting state.