As an aside, I consider this subject of technology vs. regulations to be one of the seminal climate change issues of our time, maybe the seminal
issue of climate politics — so I will continue to devote a considerable amount of ink to it.
Not exact matches
The old rule
of never discussing sex or
politics is good in theory, but when the political
climate gets heated it can be difficult to leave
issues at the door
(For a crisp, informed, and cliché - free reflection on
climate change, see Thomas Derr's «The
Politics of Global Warming» in the August / September
issue of First Things.)
But shadow environment secretary Peter Ainsworth hit back saying it was «disappointing» that Mr Huhne had «chosen to play party
politics with the serious
issue of climate change».
That could propel the
climate issue into the initial GOP debates, and maybe beyond, said Barry Rabe, a professor at the University
of Michigan who follows
climate politics.
Perry also endorsed the idea — first floated in a different form by physicist and former DOE official Steve Koonin —
of forming a «red team»
of climate science doubters to challenge a «blue team»
of mainstream researchers, in order to publicly hash out the
issues and «get the
politics out
of it.»
Accepting faults you find in Flannery's The Weather Makers, I think his book still has merits — including with regard to some aspects
of the
politics, viz criticism
of the behaviour
of the Australian government, an important ally
of the US administration on
climate issues.
She still studies
issues relevant to culturally responsive schooling, school
climate, and the
politics of education.
Her essay points to the particular
climate of the late 1960s and early 1970s in which artists grappled with central
issues of civil rights, gender
politics, and anti-war movements — battles that are still questioned and debated today.
She acknowledges they are depending upon viewer sophistication, because in the way paintings perceive nature and
issues such as
climate change, the art also comments on landscape painting's history and forces
of culture and
politics behind it.
The
Politics of Climate — Polarized views about climate issues stretch from the causes and cures for climate change to trust in climate scientists and their re
Climate — Polarized views about
climate issues stretch from the causes and cures for climate change to trust in climate scientists and their re
climate issues stretch from the causes and cures for
climate change to trust in climate scientists and their re
climate change to trust in
climate scientists and their re
climate scientists and their research.
[I] f you care about the environment and seek action on
issues like greenhouse - driven
climate change or conserving the planet's biological riches, you'd do well to focus hard right now on the debt crisis and other legacies
of politics and policies built around sustaining a free lunch culture.
Also, things are the way they are — setting aside the
politics (for recieving nations) and psychological costs (for those moving), it would make sense to some extent for people to move toward places set up for efficient wealth generation rather than to spread the wealth among the people whereever they are, so it wouldn't make sense to try to wipe the slate clean
of the advantages gained from history let along geography, although the later does bring up the
issue of climate change refugees, and some wealth generating capacity is spread out (land), and
of course some clean energy resources are rather abundant in the developing world or parts thereof, and energy needs differ geographically even for the same lifestyle — see above... this whole paragraph should reference itself....
«The Science and
Politics of Global
Climate Change, a Guide to the Debate» by Andrew Dessler and Edward Parson (Cambridge, 2006) is more comprehensive, gives a better - rounded brief treatment
of each
issue, is much better on the extra science
issues, and more thoughtful than the books in Gavin's review, as good as they are.
In case you missed it, here's a Columbia University video
of Schmidt discussing the perils when science becomes politicized and
politics gets «scientized» and other
issues related to
climate science and the public:
It's a new way
of talking about this»
issue of climate denial in U.S.
politics, Treichel added.]
[Oct. 23, 3:05 p.m. Updated Here's a Columbia University video
of Schmidt discussing the perils when science becomes politicized and
politics gets «scientized» and other
issues related to
climate science and the public:]
The new course will also be six sessions, with sessions exploring food systems — from how agriculture contributes to
climate change and how
climate change affects global food supply, to food justice and food
politics issues, to the health
of our bodies and the health
of ecosystems.
As long as the Obama Administration is not using the EPA to its maximum potential effectiveness in its proper and lawful regulatory role, then the President can be rightly accused
of playing
politics with the
issue of climate change.
The
issue that Judith seems to be addressing in her «advocacy» is the inappropriate influence
of politics in
climate science, with «inappropriate» meaning only that this political influence is interfering with scientific progress.
Just to reiterate, a careful analysis
of the scientific methodological
issues exposes most
of the
politics of Dr T's pronouncements, and draws into question his competence in this domain, and hence his right to be taken seriously as a political voice on matters
climate.
We're living in a land
of tradeoffs, where
climate is just another
issue, the
politics are partisan, the action slow, and it's all embedded in a culture
of compromise and failure.
The panel will further examine some
of the science,
politics, and media coverage
of the
climate issue, and go far toward helping debunk much of the alarmism and hype exposed in the Climate Hustl
climate issue, and go far toward helping debunk much
of the alarmism and hype exposed in the
Climate Hustl
Climate Hustle film.
The
politics associated with these
issues is directly pertinent to our discussions, but political ideologies are not because persons
of all political views are to be found among «warmers» and among «
climate realists».
I don't know so much about the particular situation regarding the funding
of climate research but it seems apparent that
politics has competely overtaken science, so on this particular
issue I don't doubt a deal will have to be made and given that there are those in positions
of influence who would quite happily scrap all funding for
climate research altogether I guess such a deal would represent a genuine compromise.
It concerns the thorny
issue of right - wing political values and
climate change, but rather than discuss the
politics, I am interested in possible solutions to GHG mitigation that don't offend the political Right.
In terms
of U.S.
politics, I expect the Republican dominated Senate to hold more congressional hearings related to
climate / energy
issues.
«The upcoming
climate change will be the most important challenge and a priority
issue for the world and define the main events in
politics, the economy, and the most important areas
of the whole
of humanity in the coming decades,» Abdussamatov concludes.
These attempts to mislead the public may well have huge adverse effects on the
climate issue, the future
of blue / red
politics, public trust in the press and public officials, serious damage to the economy and the environment, and even whether science will continue to be judged by using the scientific method.
There has been an obvious attempt to turn the
climate debate into an
issue of Left vs Right (in terms
of party
politics).
But the distribution
of wealth is amatter
of justice among countries, and a major
issue in the
politics of climate change (Stanton, 2011).
This was really an instance
of domestic
politics trumping policy, and because domestic
politics said, «Your base doesn't like Kyoto, doesn't think global
climate change is a real
issue, and hates regulation,» we never talked about the things that we were doing that were addressing the
issue.
But given the un-diametric mutual opposition between Davey and Flint's parties on the
climate issue, this hardly counts as a battle
of ideas, and barely even a disagreement about policy beyond the superficialities
of inter-party
politics.
If we look at how the
issue of climate change fits into the general perspective we have in
politics and the social sciences, we can see the limitations
of what I call «methodological nationalism».
Progressive
politics requires narratives to help communicate big
issues such as
climate change or the refugee crisis, says the editor
of Knock Twice: 25 Modern Folk Tales for Troubling Times
Well, that strategy didn't work in terms
of a justification and even prescription for policy, and it shouldn't have worked; energy and
climate policy has much more complex
issues to deal with than consensus science (
issues of politics and values).
In his
climate encyclical earlier this year, Francis framed
climate change as a key human rights
issue and called for a radical transformation
of global
politics and wasteful high - consuming lifestyles.
Ideal for youth and adults, FISH TANK, by Scott Bischke, is an insightful allegory about the human condition, tackling
issues of politics and power, limited resources and
climate change.
In his new book, Why We Disagree About
Climate Change, he explores how the issue of climate change has come to be such a dominant issue in modern po
Climate Change, he explores how the
issue of climate change has come to be such a dominant issue in modern po
climate change has come to be such a dominant
issue in modern
politics.
Its divided political landscape — plus its sheer size — make Florida a good microcosm
of voters» views on
climate issues across the country, according to Barry Rabe, an expert on the
politics of climate change at the University
of Michigan and a fellow at the Brookings Institution.
If it continues unchecked, humanity will soon be running out
of food and water... the environment, especially
climate change, is going to be the central
issue for all society, including business,
politics and the economy...
Global
climate change is so divisive and naturally there's a lot
of hate thrown by each side
of the debate, just like every divisive
issue in American
politics.
I would note that because the
issue of politics is a large one on the topic, a great deal
of scientists (addressed with the drama effect discussion a little) might studiously avoid quantification, or even mentioning «global warming» or «global
climate change» so as not to get dragged into defending their paper on a political, rather than scientific basis.
Needless to say this has been deeply disturbing to an «ordinary Joe» (with 5 grandchildren) who has made an effort to understand the science and the
politics that underlie the
climate change «debate», especially since my country has become such an important player in the fossil fuel business with its tarsands and pipeline industries that affect us all, so I've tried to find out more about Judith Curry's recent contributions to the debate, not so much the hair - splitting, angels on the head
of a pin, esoteric dissections
of graphs and stats that I see here on your website but the ethical stance that you take on the larger
issue of «killing» the IPCC and all it represents.
In his comments he adds a good deal
of intensity to the
issue, writing about «blacklists» and «possible loss
of grants» This is just as over-the-top as the PNAS paper, and just as unhelpful — if Pielke's concern is to improve the role
of climate science in policy and
politics
It's an interesting question for followers
of both
politics and
climate issues: How would things have turned out if Obama had thrown his weight behind clean energy legislation instead
of health care reform?
On the plus side, countries like Britain now have something like a «mainstream»
politics of climate — mainstream in the sense that the major political parties compete in pledging their commitment to green growth, and the
issue is extensively debated in the news media.
For many
of the groups working for the equal involvement
of women in
climate change
issues, the deliberations on
climate change are too narrowly focused on the
politics of emissions reductions, rather than the long - term social and community initiatives that could underpin a real shift in a global consciousness or more effective practices
of post-disaster rebuilding.In a statement to the U.N. General Assembly in July
of this year, executive director
of the Women's Environment and Development Organization (WEDO), June Zeitlin, points out: «Women have always been leaders in community revitalization and natural resource management.
We must use Copenhagen to rise above the petty
politics of climate change, to instead recognize it as a clearly moral
issue, with a clear choice between what is right and what is morally wrong.
The October
issue highlights
issues of climate and agriculture
issues and the need to revamp the current practices; also the October
issue of Nature covers the need or the overhaul
of economics as a discipline and
politics as usual.