If the plaintiff can demonstrate that a material
issue of fact exists, then the motion will not be granted.
Boyer v. Werner (238 A.D. 2d 853)- plaintiff broker seeks commission due from defendant broker for referral of purchaser for golf course property; purchaser ultimately purchases golf course property plus second golf course; plaintiff broker seeks commission for referral fee for purchase of both golf courses; summary judgment granted as to the issue of defendant broker's liability in relation to the sale of the first golf course only;
issue of fact exists as to referral of purchaser for second golf course and as to the amount of the commission split due (see also, Werner v. Katal Country Club [234 A.D. 2d 659]-RRB-.
First New York Realty Co., Inc. v. DeSetto (237 A.D. 2d 219)- summary judgment for broker reversed;
issue of fact exists as to payment schedule of agreed - upon commission pursuant to oral brokerage agreement.
Werner v. Katal Country Club (234 A.D. 2d 659)- broker may recover a commission in the absence of being the procuring cause in a transaction where the seller terminates the broker's activities in bad faith and as a mere device to escape the payment of the commission; triable
issue of fact exists as to seller's bad faith where seller engaged in direct negotiations with buyer and withdrew proposed contract indicating broker was the procuring cause and inserting himself as procuring cause after broker refused to reduce his commission; cause of action against attorney under Judiciary Law § 487 (1).
Harvard Associates, Ltd. v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau (238 A.D. 2d 378)- summary judgment to dismiss broker's claim for breach of contract denied where
issue of fact exists as to whether or not broker was the procuring cause of re-negotiated lease; contract provision obligates the party to protect and preserve the broker's right to recover any earned commission from the owner.
Green Realty Corp. v. Polidori (224 A.D. 2d 384)- summary judgment on issue of seller's liability granted to broker for commission where broker procured a buyer who was ready, willing and able to purchase property and listing agreement identified broker as sole broker;
issue of fact exists as to amount of commission.
Goldsmith Murphy, Inc. v. New York City Economic Development Corp. (236 A.D. 2d 339)- summary judgment motion to dismiss broker's complaint denied;
issue of fact exists as to whether broker was procuring cause of tenancy.
Hammer v. Griffin (19 A.D. 3d 450) broker's motion for summary judgment denied; triable
issue of fact exists as to whether broker had a contract with the defendant for the payment of a commission.
Fried v. David Berry Realty (17 A.D. 3d 405) brokerage agreement entitled broker to a commission when there is a meeting of the minds and a tenant was procured who was ready willing and able to lease upon the owner's terms; lease procured directly by owner conditioned lease upon obtaining operating certificates from the New York State Department of Health and the New York State Office of Mental Health; there was nothing in the record to indicate that approval by NYSOMH, which was denied, was a «term» imposed by owners and therefore triable
issues of fact exist as to whether the broker's commission was earned.
Worldnet Real Estate, Inc. v. Suchow (19 A.D. 3d 982) broker's motion for summary judgment denied;
issues of fact exist as to whether broker complied with his obligation under the listing agreement where the broker showed the property to a prospective buyer who thereafter informed the seller that they would not work with the broker and the seller thereafter terminated the listing agreement «for cause».
Dagar Group, Ltd. v South Hills Mall, LLC (12 A.D. 3d 552)- triable
issues of fact exist where brokerage agreement required lease to be signed and delivered by date certain and where no lease was signed and delivered by required date; broker raised triable issues of fact with respect to whether principles were responsible for the failure of that condition by delaying execution of the lease; possession by one party of a right to cancel the lease after it has been executed does not defeat the broker's claim to its commission
Agawam Realty v. Haggerty (223 A.D. 2d 518)- summary judgment for broker's commission reversed; material
issues of fact exist as to whether broker procured a buyer who was ready, willing and able to purchase; seller accepts second offer after initial buyer failed to sign contract and tender deposit within 8 days of receipt of contract which was based on terms of offer made by buyer in Purchase Memorandum; issue of fact as to whether buyer was willing to purchase as measured by whether buyer was provided reasonable time to sign contract and tender deposit; dissent finds broker earned commission prior to seller's determination buyer was unwilling to purchase.
Mavco Realty Corp. v M. Slayton Real Estate, Inc. (12 A.D. 3d 575)- triable
issues of fact exist as to whether or not corporate broker was licensed at the time the services which formed the consideration for the claimed commission were rendered; a broker who is unlicensed when services were rendered can not recover commissions; triable
issues of fact exist as to whether two individual defendants were licensed brokers at the time services were rendered
New Spectrum Realty Services, Inc. v. Weiser (273 A.D. 2d 172)- summary judgment for broker reversed; contract offered by proposed purchaser contained several terms which deviated from owner's offer of sale;
issues of fact exist as to whether or not owner's unilateral efforts defeated the sale
Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance of the benefits of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract of employment, express or implied, and in the absence of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance of the labors of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a third party beneficiary of lease agreement between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification between the parties and did not expressly set forth that one party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence of implied contract of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded plaintiff; triable
issues of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the parties over the lease terms, conveyed offers on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant at which the lease terms were finalized
Co. (295 A.D. 2d 554)--
issues of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause of lease where broker not only introduced tenant to the property and gave tenant a tour of the property but, at the request of tenant, also provided proprietary lease information; there are also issues of fact as to whether tenant and broker had an implied contract; Supreme Court's order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing broker's cause of action seeking to recover damages in quantum meruit affirmed
Thus, the court found that
an issue of fact existed as to whether Sawinski could perform the essential elements of his job even though he missed some work.
Not exact matches
Once again your se.xual orientation is not my
issue, the
fact that you preach about how good you are and how true your belief in the buybull is but yet you are being a hypocritew... hope your god delusion sends you to those burning pits (not that either
exist but to point out the irony
of your hypocrisy and expose you for what you are - a liar; a hypocrite; a poor example
of good christard)
The philosophy
of absolute idealism, so vigorously represented both in Scotland and America to - day, has to struggle with this difficulty quite as much as scholastic theism struggled in its time; and although it would be premature to say that there is no speculative
issue whatever from the puzzle, it is perfectly fair to say that there is no clear or easy -
issue, and that the only obvious escape from paradox here is to cut loose from the monistic assumption altogether, and to allow the world to have
existed from its origin in pluralistic form, as an aggregate or collection
of higher and lower things and principles, rather than an absolutely unitary
fact.
If NO Deity
exists, that I needn't expand another once
of concern on the
issue... If Deity / Deities DO, in
fact,
exist... Then it would seem morally appropriate for me to give thanks for my existence, given that... this thanksgiving...
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the
fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the
facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the
fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the
fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently
exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the
fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this
issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the
fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the
fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The volumes
of books on the difficulties
of marriage attest to the
fact that attachment and other
issues exist after the wedding.
In
fact, the
issue has become such a concern that the White House, NFL, the NCCA, and other similar entities have recently taken steps to better understand the risks
of concussions, enhance safety standards, and improve
existing practices so as to ensure player safety.
The
fact that such a resolution
exists is not a surprise, particularly in light
of the
fact that voters are so closely divided over this
issue — 44 - 43, according to the most recent Q poll, 43 - 41 in NYC, despite the
fact that the city's watershed would be protected via a no - drilling zone under the DEC's draft proposal.
So when people say a debt ceiling doesn't
exist this side
of February 7th 2014, they are referring to the
fact the treasury can
issue more bonds to remain cash - flow solvent.
From the Office Before an
issue of DISCOVER can
exist as a physical object, it needs to be conceptualized, reported, written, edited,
fact - checked, copyedited, designed, and supplemented with advertisements.
While Hamilton's model can explain both the latitude and longitude
of Sputnik Planitia, as well as the
fact that the ices
exist in a basin, several other models were also presented in the December 1, 2016
issue of the journal Nature.
The
issue with this process, however, is the
fact that some
of the
existing fatty acids get replaced with trans fatty acids.
Setting aside
issues of casting and approach, the
fact that this film
exists, and if this film does well, that means one very important thing: there can be others.
Some leaders may take personally the
fact that a race problem
exists in a school, or they might see it as a reflection
of the person pointing out the
issue.
That means that as soon as the policy is
issued, a small portion
of the cost is considered «earned» based on the
fact that the policy
existed at all.
This
issue is very common — in
fact, problems arising from the stress
of introducing a new cat to
existing cats are some
of the most common reasons for cats being returned to Cats Protection adoption centres after homing.
Nothwithstanding the
fact that there are a number
of people within the UKIP fold who do take
issue with the consensus proper, even they would identify a greater problem
existing with the excesses
of environmental alarmism.
The SJC rejected plaintiff's contention that a genuine
issue of material
fact exists concerning whether the BHA's various verbal assurances to her mother about the condition
of the leased premises were the kind
of «explicit and specific assurances
of safety or assistance» contemplated under G.L. c. 258, § 10 (j)(1).
On appeal, the workers argued that there
existed a genuine
issue of material
fact related to whether Zurich owed them a duty
of care, and thus granting summary judgment in Zurich's favor was in error.
To prevail on summary judgment, the defendant is required to demonstrate that no genuine
issue of material
fact exists and the undisputed
facts, when viewed in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, require judgment for the defendant as a matter
of law.
The court described the
issue as one
of «retrospective» application, mistakenly in my view, since the teacher had in
fact been charged under regulations that did not
exist when the conduct occurred.
CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, and because no
issue of material
fact exists for determination by a jury, it is axiomatic that summary judgment for Defendant should be granted.
The court continued, explaining that «a genuine
issue of material
fact exists where
facts concerning an
issue that would dispose
of the litigation are in dispute or where the undisputed material
facts are capable
of supporting conflicting inferences on such an
issue.»
Secondly, the plaintiffs assert genuine
issues of material
fact exist regarding whether the step down presented a unique, special hazard....
The record contains sufficient evidence
of a dangerous condition to create genuine
issues as to material
facts regarding both whether a dangerous condition
existed and whether Wal - Mart had constructive notice
of the dangerous condition.
2008)-- Denial
of manufacturer defendant's motion for summary judgment in cases arising from explosion at facility in Groton, Connecticut on grounds that there
existed genuine
issues of fact as to product liability and recklessness counts
of case against manufacturer based on its claimed failure to account for and disclose relevant safety and storage information
of risks involved in the transport and storage
of chemical reagent at ambient temperatures.
Imperial Cancer Research Fund v Ove Arup [2009] All ER (D) 282 (Jun); FG Hawkes v Beli Shipping [2009] All ER (D) 207 (Jul); and Sodastream v Coates [2009] All ER (D) 22 (Aug): while CPR 7.6 (2) does not impose a threshold set
of conditions, nonetheless those requirements will always be relevant to the exercise
of discretion on such an application, but the
fact that the conditions are not satisfied is not necessarily determinative
of the outcome
of a CPR 7.6 (2) application; whether the claim has become statute barred since the date on which the claim form was
issued is a matter
of considerable importance, since a time extension would disturb the entitlement
of the potential defendant to be free
of the possibility
of any claim; whether the claimant was reliant on further information which had not yet been forthcoming so as to determine whether or not a viable claim
existed, is a relevant consideration.
A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, or assert or controvert an
issue therein, unless there is a basis in law and
fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification or reversal
of existing law.
At that time, disputes involving numerous contested
facts, and particularly cases where credibility
issues existed between the parties, would rarely be dealt with by means
of summary judgment.
The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act) makes arbitration agreements «valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as
exist at law or in equity for the revocation
of any contract,» 9 U.S.C. ¶ 2, establishes an equal - treatment principle: A court may invalidate an arbitration agreement based on «generally applicable contract defenses,» but not on legal rules that «apply only to arbitration or that derive their meaning from the
fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at
issue,» AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339.
[64] Dr. Laidlow can not be faulted for testifying that there is no way to know if the accident in
fact caused one or more tears to the wall
of the plaintiff's lumbar disc — no images
exist to show the state
of her disc in intimate detail immediately before or immediately after the accident, and no physical examination short
of a biopsy could have illuminated that
issue for him.
In their submission to Supreme Court case addressing
issues of causation and Workers Compensation Appeals Tribunal jurisdiction, IAVGO and ONIWG argue that scientific certainty is not required (and in
fact definitive scientific evidence on work - related causation rarely
exists).
Bruno Appliance and Furniture, Inc. v. Hryniak, 2014 SCC 8 (34645) Summary judgment may not be granted where a genuine
issue for trial
exists; summary judgment is OK where: (1) the judge can make the necessary findings
of fact, (2) can apply the law to the
facts (3) is a proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result.
Therefore, in accordance with the terms
of our privacy statement we will not disclose to any third party for any reason either the contents
of or any
facts relating to the contents
of a user's email or any other communication a user sends to us; provided, however, such disclosure will be made when required to do so by law or by properly
issued court order or when good - faith belief
exists that such action is legally necessary to: (1) comply with the law or comply with legal process served on California Legal Research, Inc.; (2) protect and defend the legitimate business interests, rights or property
of California Legal Research, Inc., its users, customers, or affiliates; or (3) act in an emergency to protect the personal safety
of CALRI.com users or the public.