In the other two election years, the gap of a month or two between the release of scores and election day may have allowed
the issue of test scores to fade from voters» minds.
Not exact matches
Many people believe part
of the low
test score issue is that kids can't learn if they aren't there and anecdotal evidence is reporting massive truancy.
«We have to deal with the
issue of the effect
of Common Core
testing on teacher evaluations,» Cuomo said Tuesday at a news conference on the state budget, referring to the tougher curriculum standards adopted by the state that produced sharply lower
scores on standardized
tests in New York last year.
The
issue goes beyond the standard problems
of scores on state standardized
tests.
In a rare show
of unity on a controversial
issue, leaders
of both the State Senate and Assembly last week advocated a two - year moratorium that would decouple Common Core - aligned
test scores with teacher evaluations and student - placement decisions.
Over the last several months, discussions
of the Common Core State Standards have been eclipsed by the public's reaction to major
issues which have arisen in their implementation —
issues such as declining student
test scores, and the role
of such
test scores in teacher evaluations, evaluations mandated if a state was to receive its share
of federal money from the «Race to the Top» funds.
Then they estimated the relationship between people's neighborhood
scores and their performance on cognitive
tests over two years, factoring in
issues like age, gender, education and wealth, that might influence people's cognitive
scores independently
of neighborhood characteristics.
Editor's note: The text,
score, and pros and cons
of this review have been updated to reflect additional
testing of the latency
issues during four - player local multiplayer.
Betty Peltier,
of Southdown Elementary School in Houma, Louisiana, took
issue with the phrase «raising
test scores.»
As Thomas Kane and Douglas Staiger point out (see «Randomly Accountable,» in this
issue),
test scores bounce up and down from year - to - year for a variety
of reasons that are unrelated to actual school performance.
This
issue's research section offers a first -
of - its - kind study examining the impact
of instructor quality on student achievement in the higher education sector — finding that students taught by above - average instructors receive higher grades and
test scores, are more likely to succeed in subsequent courses, and earn more college credits.
It's remarkable that even [former U.S. Secretary
of Education] Arne Duncan, who arguably did as much as any one person during the past decade to increase the pressure on educators to raise
test scores, conceded that «
testing issues today are sucking the oxygen out
of the room in a lot
of schools.»
In the Fall 2012
issue of Ed Next, Marcus Winters investigated claims that Bush - era
test score gains were overstated.
These are just some
of the questions that surround the
issue of whether student
test scores should be used to evaluate teacher performance.
Winters's analysis, «Florida Defeats the Skeptics:
Test scores show real progress in the Sunshine State,» will appear in the Fall
issue of Education Next and will be available at www.educationnext.org.
The chief
issue confronting the panel was whether the
scores of students taking the
test under standard conditions and with accommodations are «comparable» — in other words, whether they have the same weight and meaning and predict freshman GPAs with the same degree
of accuracy.
Measuring Up, the new book by Professor Dan Koretz, gets beneath the surface
of educational
testing by taking a deep look at key
issues that affect students»
scores.
He has a commanding grasp
of the complex
issues plaguing the educational system, and will avoid well - intended but simplistic principles like the idea that
test scores can be the basis for accountability.
Published in the December
issue of Psychological Science, thestudyevaluated two groups
of 8th graders on such factors as grades, standardized -
test scores, and IQ -
test scores.
We can address this
issue by comparing the prior
test scores of charter school applicants in our data with the
test scores of students in regular public schools in their neighborhoods (within three miles).
I was one
of the two psychometricians on the panel that advised the College Board on the
issue of whether the SAT
scores of disabled students who take the
test with accommodations should be «flagged» (see Miriam Kurtzig Freedman, «Disabling the SAT,» Feature, Fall 2003).
In another finding, expected by some to fuel the controversy that surrounds the
issue of standardized
testing, the
test results showed that non-military white youths
scored almost twice as high as black civilian youths, with Hispanic civilians
scoring in between the levels
of the other two groups.
The problem with framing the
issue merely as a question
of whether technology boosts
test scores is that it fails to address the interaction between technology and the values learned in school.
A story and chart in the May 14, 2008,
issue of Education Week about states that have curtailed bilingual education should have said that trends in student achievement identified by Daniel J. Losen
of the Civil Rights Project at the University
of California, Los Angeles, were based on
test scores in reading
of English - language learners in 4th grade, not 4th and 8th grades.
The high level
of interest in local school
test scores raises some interesting
issues:
Attention to
test scores in the value - added estimation raises
issues of the narrowness
of the
tests,
of the limited numbers
of teachers in
tested subjects and grades,
of the accuracy
of linking teachers and students, and
of the measurement errors in the achievement
tests.
08.22.2017 In response to the release
of the third through eighth grade English Language Arts (ELA) and Math
test scores, Kim Sweet, Executive Director,
issued the following statement:
A study by Marty West and Guido Schwerdt that appeared in the Spring 2012
issue of Ed Next found that moving to a middle school causes a substantial drop in student
test scores (relative to that
of students who remain in K — 8 schools).
Peterson, a fan
of Rhee's, takes
issue with this report and a separate one that was more critical
of Rhee's tenure, accusing the authors
of mischaracterizing
test score gains, going beyond their mission and making other errors.
[6] To deal with this selection
issue, we make use
of the within - school, across - grade variation in the volume
of entering refugees to explore the effects on the educational outcomes
of existing students including
test scores, disciplinary incidents, and student mobility across schools.
A series
of excellent papers by economists Thomas Kane, Douglas Staiger, and Dale Ballou (see «Randomly Accountable,» Education Next, Spring 2002, and «Sizing Up Value - Added Assessment,» this
issue) scrutinize the error built into value - added
test -
score measures, many
of which are used in state accountability systems.
A study by Kirabo Jackson published in the Fall 2008
issue of Ed Next found that a program that paid students and teachers for passing
scores on Advanced Placement
tests produced meaningful increases in participation in the AP program and improvements in other critical education outcomes.
Because fewer students passed the
test than passed the previous high school exam, the Maryland Board
of Education is now considering whether to lower the
score needed to pass the
test or to
issue two different diplomas, one for students who pass the PARCC exam and are ready for college and one for students who get a lower
score on the
test.
They also have a negative effect on their classroom peers, resulting in decreased
test scores and increased disciplinary problems according to a new study by economists Scott Carrell
of the University
of California — Davisand Mark Hoekstra
of the University
of Pittsburgh, published in the summer
issue of Education Next.
While not mentioned in the Times editorial, the appropriate use
of student
test scores is an
issue in LAUSD because
of the new teacher evaluation system that had seemingly been agreed to earlier this year but is now the subject
of much dispute.
The
issue of how much weight LAUSD will propose giving student
test scores — left unspecified in the agreement — is emerging as a major concern...
Making an
issue of using
test scores to evaluate teachers means taking on powerful teacher unions, pitting a core Democratic interest group against a major goal
of the Obama administration.
These findings led the researchers to call for further research on
issues related to the specificity
of the frameworks, effects on equity, inflated
test scores, and the validity
of the measures.
In one study soon to be published in an education policy textbook co-edited with Carol Mullen, Education Policy Perils: Tackling the Tough
Issues, I report on a study in which I predicted the percentage
of students in grade 5, at the district level, who
scored proficient or above on New Jersey's former standardized
tests, NJASK, in mathematics language arts for the 2010, 2011, and 2012 school years for the almost 400 school districts that met the sampling criteria to be included in the study.
At the same time, their silence gives tacit support to arguments by traditionalists that standardized
testing should not be used in evaluating teachers or for systemic reform (even when, as seen this week from American Federation
of Teachers President Randi Weingarten and others critical
of the state education policy report card
issued by Rhee's StudentsFirst, find it convenient to use
test score data for their own purposes).
While negotiations between the union and district have stalled over the
issue of how much weight to give student
test scores, E4E - LA members found that teachers would support incorporating student growth data, but worry about focusing myopically on one high - stakes
test.
After several years in which teachers» unions have been hammered on the
issue of tenure, have lost collective bargaining rights in some states and have seen their evaluations increasingly tied to student
scores, they have begun, with some success, to reassert themselves using a bread - and - butter
issue: the annual
tests given to elementary and middle school students in every state.
The controversial National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ)-- created by the conservative Thomas B. Fordham Institute and funded (in part) by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation as «part
of a coalition for «a better orchestrated agenda» for accountability, choice, and using
test scores to drive the evaluation
of teachers» (see here; see also other instances
of controversy here and here)-- recently
issued yet another report about state's teacher evaluation systems titled: «Running in Place: How New Teacher Evaluations Fail to Live Up to Promises.»
Among other controversies and
issues of contention noted in these articles (see again here, here, and here), one
of note (highlighted here) is also that now, «even after seven years»... the state is still «unable to truly explain or provide the actual mathematical calculation or formula» used to link
test scores with teacher ratings.
Still, beyond even the
test scores issue, there continue to be adjustments to the current process, some
of them contentious.
The debate erupted in August, when The Times published a database
of the value - added
scores of about 6,000 elementary school teachers based on seven years
of testing data, prompting union protests and vows by the district to raise the
issue during contract negotiations.
An analysis
of 2017
test scores from Smarter Balanced member states found no technical
issues with the assessment, Smarter Balanced announced today.
Therefore, a key
issue in determining alignment is the degree to which assessment results lead to correct classification
of test scores and, by extension, correct interpretations
of student performance relative to learning objectives and standards.
How student
test scores are used to evaluate teachers is at the heart
of the unresolved
issues causing Chicago's first strike in 25 years.
Back to the
issue at hand, why should
test score data, even crunched in a value - added way, be published in the paper alongside the names
of individual teachers?